You make the stupid claim that I'm not married

Not true. I merely pointed out that you have no way to prove that you're married. There's a difference, but you're not bright enough to be able to figure that out.

No, your insinuation was either that I wasn't married, or nothing could be proven. Since the latter completely shuts down debate, it can be ignored.

It is a favorite silly trick of yours, to simply change the subject or provide false choices.

Can you produce a marriage certificate? No.

Can you at least show us a wedding ring? No.

I could do both, but you know I am not going to post that kind of personal information, because even if I did, you'd just say it was faked.

That said, that's not the only type of information needed as proof.

You claimed I was lying about my wife having a kidney transplant. I showed proof in an older post, that specifically and in the context of a thread on organ transplants supported that she had a transplant.

Your response, which is typical when you are caught, is simply to dismiss the evidence. Just claim it doesn't matter.

Your word, Sir, doesn't constitute evidence. You just want it to, so you can make bizarre claims to support your right-wing propaganda.

Right, I make up supporting evidence in posts months previous so that I can tie back to them in the future.

That's ridiculous. A pattern of posts, with no ability to know what someone would argue in the future, is proof.

You don't want to accept it, because you cannot admit to being wrong and being caught being wrong.

It's back to your inability to admit you were wrong when you said I was talking property tax, when I wrote income tax 18 times.

You have the habit of being wrong, getting caught, then simply playing childish games to get out of it.

And to prove that we have your posts, and that is overwhelming evidence.

So, my posts are evidence when you want them to be, but old posts aren't support when you don't want them to be.

A right winger who supports gay marriage and late term abortion. I doubt anyone will buy that.

Oh, you can find ample posts of mine on Salon showing I support gay marriage and late term abortion.

You lied about organ transplants, got caught in your lies, and hate that you've been caught again.

If it were a harmless lie, it would be one thing, but you lied, and continued to lie about a subject matter that kills people. You still haven't retracted your lie that organs are for sale in the US, you still advocate that lie. That lie still causes people to die.

Your lie increases the likelihood of people on transplant waiting lists dieing.

Trying to change the subject doesn't change that fact.

You're a notorious Jew hater, as based on your many posts attacking Jews.

But it's not acceptable to say "them Christians" or "them Muslims" either, if used in a derogatory manner.

If a group of Christians do some things that may be informed and guided by their own sense of Christian identity, then you are allowed to say "them Christians" when referring to that specific group of people.

What, you are trying to argue that Jews have some type of own sense of Jewish identity that allows or disallows access to the President. It wouldn't shock me coming from you, since you already think Jews control everything.

And you are allowed to disagree with their actions, and you are allowed to identify those actions with their own self-proclaimed identity as a distinct group.

And you are allowed to disagree with Jews as well. But that's not what you do. Instead you claim Jews have some secret conspiracy to take over the World, or that it's natural to their own self-proclaimed identity as a distinct group.

And you are Not allowed to disagree with their actions, and you are Not allowed to identify those actions with their own self-proclaimed identity as a distinct group.

I disagree with people who are Jewish all the time. Invisible Jewish ninja's don't come and kill me whilst I sleep.

I thought No-Doz's post was polite, thoughtful and informative. OTOH, your post was nothing but a baseless attack that accuses No-Doz of things that are not even in his/her post.

-- Alkaline

What Koppleman wrote had zero bearing to No-Doz's reply. So why did No-Doz make his post?

He did so in order to attack Jews via attacking Zionism.

Was it out of some concern for misplaced people? No, because they are plenty of such people, such as the Sudenten. They are never mentioned, despite an exceedingly similar experience to Palestinians, even including time.

Why do you think that is, other than that Jews were involved in the latter?

When people take actions that are done by dozens of groups, and only single out those actions if Jews are involved. There's a reason. The person has an issue with Jews.

Furthermore if it was a house that was in as good standing as the U.S. Federal Government (which, by the way, has NEVER reneged on a debt),

Ask France. We refused to repay our loans to France after our independence..

You make the stupid claim that I'm not married

Fine.

Prove that you are.

You can't. Show otherwise.

HAW HAW HAW.

-- walter_map

Already did.

Show how you can read income tax 18 times and think property tax, and not either be incompetent or a liar.

That's something you can't prove.