This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:00 AM

The happy hypocrite

I never cared that Caitlin Flanagan calls herself an at-home mother, even though she's a magazine writer with a staff of helpers. But now she's using her battle with cancer to denounce feminism and extol her traditional virtues -- and I've had it.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, April 12, 2006 01:03 PM

    Like the review

    Not that I question the validity of the author's criticism in this article, but I'd just like to point something out. Flanagan's self-righteousness is obviously enjoyed by someone, she wouldn't get work otherwise. Clearly she can't be writing for most of America, because most people in America who have children at home simply can't afford to pay for an adult staying at home as well, no matter the reason. Whether she's being read by women who agree, or men who take heart in her 'traditional' values, she's clearly being read (and noticed) by a minority. Thus, a retort like this, while I'm certain that it's correct if the characterization of the book is true, can only be applicable to those same people as well.

    I assure you that while I might agree with some of what she says and disagree with other bits (and if the quotes in the article are any indication, I do both) none of that changes the fact that if I were aware of her book before I read this article I and just about everyone I know would dismiss it as complete and utter useless tripe. The very notion of the stay-at-home-mother (regardless of Flanagan's hypocrisy on the definition of it) is absurd, and will become even more and more rare in all practical experience because (sorry to get up on my own soapbox, here) the rich want everyone who can work out there working for them. The value of 'traditional Americana' isn't worth the percentage dip in their own fortunes that they'd have to take if the economy were to realign, so it's just not going to happen.

    In the meantime, real wives and mothers out in the world have no reason to subject themselves to trash like Flanagan's self-righteous essays, any more than I'd like to read a book about the adventures of a man with a foot long penis and how much better he can please women than I can. Some people might enjoy torturing themselves like that, but I can't see how it's healthy.

Most Active Letters Threads

509

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
311

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
151

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon