Letters to the Editor
-
A battle?
I found nothing wrong with the body of the article, but the title (the thesis?) seems odd. The son does not share his father's values, and he does his own thing. His father watches at a distance but keeps his own opinions to himself. How is this a "battle"?
-
Mr. Unger omits the 9/11 attack in the Bush article.
To ignore the facts, the evidence, the witnesses' accounts of the 9/11 attack while publishing a story focused upon Bush 43 is a grave omission. The 9/11 attack is the center piece of the Iraq war. Please consider this:
It is unthinkable that Bush & Cheney would direct and order the 9/11 attack to sell the Iraq war to American citizens. Being unthinkable is not impossible. Unfortunately the unthinkable is clearly supported by the facts.
Usually the first question asked by skeptics is, “Why would they do that?” The 9/11 attacks have been the center piece by Bush & Cheney as their reason to attack Iraq. They keep stating it is their job to protect America from terrorists. They have stated repeatedly that Saddam encouraged, supported, and financed terrorism. They are correct. They also stated that Saddam was connected to Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden which is a lie. How many lies can they keep telling us before they lose credibility? The explosions heard by credible fire fighters in the towers is definitive, spectacular evidence being ignored by the official 911 Commission. How strange and crazy is that?
It was suspicious to me that after the planes hit the WTC towers and before the towers collapsed there were reporters at the scene who commented they had heard explosions. While these reporters interviewed fire fighters in, at, and around the WTC to rescue people in the towers the fire fighters also mentioned explosions.
A firefighter stated "it looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building . . . Then the building started to come down. My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV";
Dan Rather said that collapse was "reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen [when] a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down" (CNN's Aaron Brown and a Fox News reporter also made similar comments);
A Wall Street Journal reporter said "I heard this metallic roar, looked up and saw what I thought was just a peculiar site of individual floors, one after the other exploding outward. I thought to myself, "My God, they're going to bring the building down." And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES . . . . I saw the explosions";
Because it is so unthinkable to suspect that Bush & Cheney would command the 9/11 attack I failed to study the facts that concerned citizens had revealed for almost six years. It was not until around July or August 2007 that I watched a documentary titled LOOSE CHANGE that I learned facts that made it conclusive beyond any question that:
1) Osama bin Laden’s, Al Qaeda suspects were used to trick me.
2) American Airlines Flight 77 never hit the Pentagon because the Pratt Whitney jet engines that power the Boeing 757 were not in the wreckage at the Pentagon. *
3) We know that none of the passengers on Flight 77 ever returned home.
4) Wherever Flight 77 was landed, the 64 people on board were surely murdered.
5) Only an expert demolition team could rig the explosives in the three buildings that collapsed at the WTC.
6) Each of the three buildings collapsed at around ½ a second slower than free fall speed.
7) WTC security allowed the expert team to rig the explosives prior to the 9/11 attack. The bomb sniffing dogs used to patrol the WTC had to be switched with untrained dogs to prevent constant barking.
8) Only the Commander-In-Chief has the power to order the NORAD General to order his pilots to leave their post on 9/11. No General in his right mind would order his security to leave its post.
To simply assume that the unthinkable is impossible would be ignorant. There is nothing more important than to allow critical thinking by students about the most spectacular event since the assassination of JFK. If the issues I have raised prove false or lead to a different conclusion, then a legitimate effort will have been made by educators to teach an academic, logical thought process to their students. If American educators continue to condone the farfetched, nonsensical government version of the 9/11 attack they are underwriting the destruction of democracy in America.
If anything deserves some extra effort for the education of our youth in America the 9/11 attack is uniquely on the top of the list. I suspect that educators who have accepted the Bush / Cheney government trick are going to be reluctant to open this case up for legitimate scrutiny. I am not so foolish to believe that educators will drop everything they are now doing to add this to the curriculum of their students. The response time will speak for itself.
There are three sources I ask each of you to hear.
The first is a presentation by William Rodriguez. Please click this link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294
After we discuss this I will give you the other sources. You will find Mr. Rodriguez to be very enlightening. He is an amazing hero. Many groups invite him to speak because he is so credible.
• The titanium/steel alloyed jet engines can’t evaporate.
-
Bush's ancestor
There is an excellent book recently published by the Israeli writer Michael Oren, "Power, Faith, and Fantasy: America in the Middle East, 1776 to the Present". In great detail he traces the relationship of the United States and the Middle East. He documents that from the early years of the Republic evangelical missionaries were in the Ottoman Empire evangelizing in the Holy Land and preaching about the coming Rapture. Long before the development of Zionism late in the 19th century and long before the discovery of oil in the area for the industrializing countries in the 1930’s, Protestant missionaries were campaigning for a homeland for the Jews. Of note is George Bush, ancestor of the current President, who, in his 1844 treatise, The Valley of Vision: or, The Dry Bones of Israel Revived, “called for “elevating” the Jews “to a rank of honorable repute among the nations of the earth” by re-creating their state in Palestine. Such restitution would benefit not only the Jews but all of mankind, forming a “link of communication” between humanity and God (p. 141) Of the current President’s identification with evangelicals, Oren says, “This made him the spiritual heir and not merely the genetic descendent of Professor George Bush who in the 1840’s advocated the creation of a Jewish state, and of the colonial theologians who warned of the dangers of militant Islam.” (p. 554)