Letters to the Editor
-
Sad But True
Carlos failed to transcend very much perhaps in his personal life. He may have plagiarized philosophical and spiritual ideas. He may have made stuff up.
Does that make the concepts in his writings invalid?
I would posit, that rational people do not take the Bible to be literally true. They might also suspect that Jesus was not the first to pronounce insights or teachings attributed to him. They might nevertheless find that their lives and actions are meaningfully and fruitfully informed by The Sermon on the Mount.
If the concepts are valid and useful, what difference does the source make? It’s like hating a great painting because the artist is an ass who lies about how he produced the painting. It doesn’t matter. The painting is still great.

