Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

sansho1

Published Letters: 296
Editor's Choice: 39

Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:57 AM
Original article: Various items

asdf

This is how virtually all meaningful journalism works -- politicians confide in someone that they think will keep it a secret, and then that person goes and tells a journalist, who reports it.

This is just wrong -- meaningful journalism means a hell of a lot more than just blockbuster exposes. If you are a journalist on a particular beat, you typically have to interview the same people over and over again. A great deal of meaningful journalism comes from reporting what politicians say on the record. For every Nixon, there are a dozen George Allens, who are publicly hoisted on their own petards.

And that's the key -- if you establish some level of rapport, you can publish all sorts of revealing (intentionally and otherwise) statements, on the record, and come back the next week for another interview. If you go with gotcha, your source is spoiled forever. In the case of Woodward and Bernstein, the public interest was undoubtedly served. But if your "gotcha" revelation is merely titillation, as with the case here, then you've spoiled a source for nothing, and thus reduced your future ability to perform the functions of the Fourth Estate.

Saturday, June 14, 2008 05:05 PM
Original article: Various items

Reply to Glenn

If you're a journalist and a source comes to you and tells you what a politician said in private (assuming it's of relevance to a matter of public interest), is it unethical for you to report that statement which the politician thought was in being made in private (because the source never warned him that he'd leak it)?

OF COURSE NOT. Nobody would ever say it was unethical for the journalist to disclose such information.

By what possible logic, then, could it be unethical for the source simply to publish it himself????

I agree with you. Your caveat about relevance is actually the crux of our disagreement regarding this particular incident. You can publish just about anything you want, but that doesn't make you a journalist. I don't believe what Mayhill Fowler did was journalism, because I fail to see the relevance to public interest in her revelation. Vanity Fair published a hit piece, and Clinton is angry about it. So what? Alter overreacted, but in doing so defended a basic journalistic precept that you summarily dismiss. Well, I don't think it should be dismissed, and I've tried to explain why. I'm not going to answer any more hypotheticals in the attempt, sorry.

I believe in citizen journalism, when I see it happen. I believe in the societal value of agents provocateurs, when they expose something important. I just don't blindly equate the two.

Saturday, June 14, 2008 06:01 PM
Original article: Various items

L.W.M.

They say there's no such thing as a perfect analogy, and I think you just proved it. A better one might be if I were to throw a ball against the side of my house and catch it, and tell everyone that it was baseball.

Sunday, June 15, 2008 05:17 AM
Original article: Various items

rollotomasi

Thanks for doing the heavy lifting while the rest of us bloviate.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008 05:16 AM

And people say

Boston fans are insufferable...

Tuesday, June 24, 2008 08:17 PM

I have only one question...

Will Mel_Odius ever find true love? And, if so, will it be soon?

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 05:23 PM

The perfect SNL skit

would be Favre reprising Chris Kattan's role as Mango.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008 07:44 PM

That would have to be...

...Studs Terkel. A fine story about one of our greatest story-tellers. Here's hoping he lives to see an Obama victory, and that the victor is worthy of old Studs.

Friday, July 11, 2008 06:38 AM

@jeffersonian

his reeking ashes should be scattered over Stone Mountain, georgia

Stone Mountain, Georgia is a predominantly black community that was until recently was represented in Congress by Cynthia McKinney, the person least like Jesse Helms in all of human history. You'd have to work pretty hard to find a less-receptive "ideological homeland" for Helms' ashes.

Friday, July 11, 2008 07:39 AM

Cynthia's conspiracies

include the implications that Tupac Shakur's murder was engineered by some combination of shadowy government forces, and that the CIA introduced crack cocaine to black neighborhoods. So there's that.

Friday, July 11, 2008 07:46 AM

Cynthia's conspiracies (part 2)

Oh yeah, almost forgot. She also believes that AIPAC was responsible for her loss to Denise Majette -- a liberal, black woman who beat her by 16 points...

Monday, July 14, 2008 03:43 AM
Original article: Returns, returns, returns

McEnroe

I'll join in the superlatives parade and say that, while his boosterism can irritate, there's no greater advocate for his/her sport than John McEnroe. Maybe he's just raging against the dying of the light, but his determination to serve the sport that made him rich and famous is admirable. Contrast that with the quick fade pulled by so many other popular tennis stars upon retirement, and old Mac is left to pull a lot of weight.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 01:47 PM
Original article: The amazing Josh Hamilton

The amazing Julio Franco

While he had never stopped playing, Julio had had only one major league AB in just short of four MLB seasons when the Braves signed him in 2001, whereupon he proceeded to hit .300 at age 42 (and continued on from there). Nobody ever said Julio wasn't amazing -- I just wanted to bring him up in the context of batters who'd missed a lot of time against MLB pitching.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008 07:42 AM
Original article: A.L. wins All-Star marathon

asdf

would you mind telling your readers what's so dumb about having the All-Star game decide home field for the World Series.

"Now pitching, JD Drew" doesn't answer that question?

Seriously, why should (for instance) the Chicago Cubs pay a competitive price for Dan Uggla having a bad exhibition game?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:32 PM

asdf

The needs of the planet trump my cynicism about this particular messenger. Of course he's in it for the money -- he's said so. That doesn't change the fact that he's right on this one, and he's uniquely capable of making it happen.

Thursday, July 24, 2008 05:55 AM
Original article: Stark, raving mad

Betty de jour

I'm eagerly anticipating Betty's rebellion in season two. Goodbye Grace Kelly, hello Catherine Deneuve!

Most Active Letters Threads

543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
508

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
434

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
200

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
144

Mike Huckabee's fatally bad judgment

Brutality by another Huck-pardoned criminal suggests the 2012 GOP hopeful listened more to pastors than prosecutors

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon