Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

smartalek

Published Letters: 129
Editor's Choice: 24

Friday, March 9, 2007 10:27 PM
Original article: The face of war

if anyone is moved to donate

anything to groups that help take care of injured or disabled vets, this is what a few minutes of googling came up with:

(Pls note: I did not vet any of these organizations in any way. And the two links at the bottom of the list make it very clear that there are some questionable players in the field, and caution is warranted. Pls do your own due diligence before contributing anything to anyone.)

Disabled American Veterans Charitable Service Trust:

http://www.dav.org/cst/index.html

Disabled American Veterans National Service Foundation:

http://www.dav.org/nsf/index.html

Paralyzed Veterans of America:

http://www.pva.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage

Rebuilding Together Serving Those Who Serve:

http://www.servingthosewhoserve.com/site/c.nlI5IiNXJuE/b.1483107/k.BE18/Home.htm

Homes for our Troops:

http://www.homesforourtroops.org/site/PageServer

Fisher House:

http://www.fisherhouse.org/

Operation Helping Heal:

http://www.helpingheal.org/

Wounded Warrior Project:

http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/site/c.iqLTI2OBKlF/b.1109077/k.DFF8/Programs.htm

Helping Our Heroes Foundation:

http://www.hohf.org/about.htm

Army Emergency Relief:

http://www.aerhq.org/

Navy – Marine Corps Relief Society:

http://www.nmcrs.org/services.html

Some cautionary notes:

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/special_packages/veterans/past_coverage/13510354.htm

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm

And Salon? It's not terribly helpful when you delete posts that generated such a strong response from so many people. I understand the point about culling abusive personal attacks. But perhaps a better solution might be to delete the offensive personal material, but to leave everything else by way of content?

Why should you do vicious people the favor of not letting the world see how vile they are? If there are people out there who are so offensive as to warrant censorship, aren't those exactly the people we should know about, and be ready and able to deal with?

Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:55 AM
Original article: Screw you for not smoking

congrats to all

who take the difficult step to walk away from one of the most addictive substances known.

One other thing that might help is regular, rigorous, and long-lasting workouts of sufficient intensity and duration to bring on the endorphin rush -- a highly effective way to fight depression, anxiety, etc.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:28 PM
Original article: "The Black Dahlia"

huh

"a lesbian nightclub she occasionally frequented"

You cannot "frequent" anyplace "occasionally." It's one or the other.

Hey, but at least you didn't call her "slatternly."

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:52 AM

it's true

These people are like a planned-obsolescence program for humor -- how can we ever again tell the old lawyer joke (Q: How can you tell when a lawyer is lying? A: Check to see if their lips are moving.) when the Bushists live that reality for us daily?

The trolls who write in every week to tell us that Tom Tomorrow has "phoned it in again" do have a bit of a point -- whatever lunacy anyone can produce by way of satire is inevitably outdone by the actual behaviors of the Bushists.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:06 PM

In the role of Rove

I see Philip Seymour Hoffman -- he should be beyond brilliant.

Will Ferrell reprises his classic W, of course.

For Cheney, I'm not sure Gene Hackman is quite evil enough -- maybe Robert Loggia?

And do we think Whoopi has it in her to do Condi justice (as it were)?

Most Active Letters Threads

452

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
88

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon