Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

art guerrilla

Published Letters: 371
Editor's Choice: 1

Friday, June 12, 2009 05:34 AM

sweet geebus, who took the broads out of broadsheet ? ? ?

molly, we need you more than ever ! ! !

1. i will note that broadsh'ite broads CONSISTENTLY go on about using the word 'pussy' as a putdown... unfortunately, not only does it show their self-absorbed, janey-one-note, uber-sensitivity and that they need to grow a pair (of ovaries, if you insist), BUT they are WORLD CLASSLESS HYPOCRITES ! ! ! (*and* a bunch of pussies; but that is all too common for libtards, with or without neuticles)

have you EVER heard of a broadbased broadsheet broad EVER denouncing the use of the term 'dick' ? ? ? what is sauce for the, um, goose, is sauce for the gander, no ? ? ?

well, ain't it ? ? ?

if you are against such 'horrible' treatment (*snicker*), then you should be equally adamant that men don't get 'smeared' with the corresponding insult of 'dick', richtig ? ? ? (*even if* it is darth cheney, right ? ? ?) where'd you go ? ? ?

no, you gals don't give a shit...

(*and* it make me mad that YOU put me on the side of rush limpballs because i decry such prissy prattle by young and stupids; you REALLY don't understand why MANY PEOPLE don't get so upset over him labeling you punchline-feminists as 'feminazis'... your average nekkid apes thinks there is something to that, BECAUSE OF YOUR BEHAVIOR, NOT HIS ! ! !)

2. for the tenth or twelvth time: IF you mock shocked monkeys are *really* so disturbed by the use of these words, you will post the letters you CONSTANTLY write to jon stewart or steven colbert, since they use such phrases ALL THE FUCKING TIME...

yeah, step right up, show me the articles where you lambast them with your shrill grrly horseshit; forward a copy of the outraged letters you send to comedy central/viacom/ge/(whoever the fuck their korporate overlords are) that excoriate them (on practically a daily basis) for the 'disrespect' of men and wymins...

*snort*

there are no such articles, there are no such letters, you are hypocritical shrews and banshees, picking and choosing your faux outrage as it suits your shaming purposes, shut the fuck up...

3. are there 'sluts' or not ? ? ? have we evolved to such an open, free, and tolerant society that the concept of 'slut' has no meaning ? ? ? i don't think so... can ANYONE be accused -jokingly or not, metaphor or not- of being a slut, or is that simply verboten (you know, notwithstanding all our super-free speech and shit) ? ? ? can a male be a slut ? can a politician ? (aren't they really sluts almost by definition ? ) can ANYONE be a slut anymore, or is that simply forbidden on chick planet ? ? ?

4. free speech is messy; libtards don't like it, feminists don't like it, and saloonies don't like it, but some few still think it is a worthwhile enterprise...

(funny that feministas have that in common with reichwing fucktards: they BOTH like to CENSOR...)

hee hee hee

ho ho ho

ha ha ha

ak ak ak

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

art guerrilla@windstream.net

eof

Saturday, June 13, 2009 02:27 AM
Original article: Tribalistic self-absorption

dog damn ! did i write this column...

hee hee hee

no, not enough dirty words in it for me...

ho ho ho

saint glenn is starting to repeat my memes for me...

ha ha ha

wait until he gets to the endgame...

ak ak ak

my three main memes:

- loss of tribe

- profit without honor

- teevee brain

loss of tribe has a myriad of social implications, but essentially, no one HAS their own tribe anymore, except for a scattered, distant family, and a sports team they weakly root for with their superficial tribe substitute...

no one has a place in the tribe; no one has a function the tribe depends on; no one belongs; we're all tribal outcasts, searching for place and meaning in tribe...

profit without honor (not like this prophet without honor) obviously goes to the heart of kapitalist imperialism, and the immoral, inhuman 'values' of greed and gluttony which devalue many humans for the express purpose of enriching a few, and we think that's 'okay'...

teevee brain has infected most of the young and stupids: entertain me, NOW! no... NOW! NOW! MORE! NOW! MINE! NOW! FEED ME ! ! !

passive, all-consuming, superficial, and nutrition-free infotainment which stimulates our pleasure-centers, but still leaves a void we can not fill...

MORE! NOW !!! MORE MORE MORE ! ! !

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

eof

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
663

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
323

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon