Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

art guerrilla

Published Letters: 372
Editor's Choice: 1

Wednesday, April 25, 2007 07:47 AM
Original article: This little piggy

see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil...

yeah, *that's* all we have to do to make a 'civil' (sic) society:

1. ban all 'dirty' words (oh brother, that slope won't get too slippery, will it baby-citizens)...

2. allow only 'nice' words/thoughts... (*snicker*)

3. ignore the root causes of loss of tribe, teevee brain, and profit without honor which have -naturally enough- produced a morally bankrupt system which values only money/power, and devalues people, justice, and equity...

(got theocracy ?)

nope, let's not discuss the basic causes of a seriously debased, debauched, and despairing society (*shhhh* don't tell anyone, but it has something to do with unrestrained kapitalist imperialism); instead, let's talk about some dirty hippie's pottymouth...

yeah, that'll fix it...

fuckin' jerks...

MHalblaub: right fucking on bro/sis; pissy, prissy prigs who use asterisks to avoid actually TYPING 'dirty' words (*gasp*!) need to grow the fuck up... it is fundamentally dishonest, and shows a scared, timid sheeple who doesn't believe in free speech... (that means you, catherine the not so great)

Vardaman: tip of the hat to you too, for pointing out that the REALITY of half or more of our pwecious wittle babies in school, is that of virtual anarchy, where cursing is so tame, that it is mostly ignored... the anon poster living in cloud-cuckooland (or yuppie suburbia) who opined about 'one child mouthing off' does not have a FUCKING CLUE of what MOST schools are like...

NOT that schools should be like that, but the so-called innocence of the pwecious babies is VASTLY overemphasized... further, i personally believe that the little monsters -as clueless as they may otherwise be- intuit (if not internalize) the pervasive and ACCEPTABLE (repeat, ACCEPTABLE, if not lauded) MAINSTREAM BEHAVIORS of brazen denial, baldfaced lying, shirking responsibility, and whiplashing hypocrisy which 'our' (sic) fearless leadership demonstrates every day, AND GETS AWAY WITH ! ! !

why shouldn't they be lying, selfish, braying assholes JUST LIKE our supposed betters ? ? ?

TomRakewell: Oh.My.God. apparently, you are the living definition of prig... 'nimrod' (or ANY word) ONLY has meaning inasmuch as we the sheeple GIVE IT meaning... it don't matter what the fuck it says in your oxford's unabridged; IN FACT, oxfords will seek out the common usage to change THEIR 'definition' to conform with usage...

i'm afraid your campaign -as important as it is- to reclaim the 'rightful' definition of 'nimrod' is doomed...

(*what* a fuckin' nimrod...)

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

eof

Friday, April 27, 2007 08:28 AM

omnivores are from earth, vegans are from vega...

1. kudos to huldrenette and cheekier for their explanations of what *should* be obvious to all living beings: you know, the teeny-tiny factoid that nekkid apes have been omnivores for lo these many hundreds of thousands of years...

got grubs ? ? ?

(*notwithstanding* the present sub-optimal systems of factory farming, etc...)

2. melodramatic romantics who are just so shaky-voiced upset over killing/eating soft and fuzzy creatures need to get over their pseudo-sensitivities... i love animals, and i also love to eat animals; there is NO contradiction...

(more than a few of them would love to eat us, given half a chance... so far, we've been better armed...)

i thank brother chicken for the his bbq arm i munch, i appreciate bessie has given her life so i might live, i am grateful that sister fishie has been broiled so that i might be fed; but i ain't gonna hold a funeral service for them...

3. thanks also to comrade rupert-c who made what i think is a real and valid point: vegans don't care about the 'feelings' of vegetables...

seriously...

i believe plants have 'feelings' (of a sort), i believe they react to being chopped down, uprooted, sliced up, boiled alive ...

but -ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN 'PRINCIPLES'- vegans don't really care, now do they...

*where* do we draw the line, kampers ? ? ?

4. gorgona made an excellent point regarding the inconsistency and foolishness of vegans who have pets and feed them meat...

not one defender of the vegan way would answer that seriously... hmmm, wonder why...

(creepy vegans who insist their pets love and thrive on *their* forced vegan diets are fooling no one, least of all their pets... given a 'choice' between some tofu crap and a steaming hunk of wormy meat, the abused pets will rip out their owner's throat to get the meat... so much for 'love'...)

5. sonofabastard, perhaps you are a bastard; but mostly, you're just a dick... case in point: the repudiation of anonymous posters (*as if* 'sonofabastard' is somehow less anonymous than saying 'anonymous'); i really have a difficult time respecting pompous pricks who are so dog damned self-righteous about the 'impropriety' of anonymous posters...

fuck all you dickheads...

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

eof

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
369

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
320

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon