Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

art guerrilla

Published Letters: 367
Editor's Choice: 1

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 01:53 PM
Original article: Blood-and-guts politics

piglia ? ? ? clit ? ? ? well, which was it ? ? ?

...that caused the hobnailed boot of the arbitrary CENSORS to kick in ? ? ?

hee hee hee

i'm betting it was too uncomfortably close to the truth when i mentioned her weird public pantings after wimmenz...

ho ho ho

i don't give a shit that she pants after wimmenz (i do to, i just have the good sense to do it internally), i just don't think it is an appropriate behavior in the circumstances...

ha ha ha

yep, the constitution is being used to wipe the collective asses of our fearless leaders, but calling piglia out on her piggishness is just beyond the pale...

ak ak ak

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

eof

Tuesday, August 5, 2008 11:39 AM

@ LWiMp

baliwick, you fucking moron...

Thursday, September 11, 2008 07:31 AM

in spite of glenn's assertions otherwise...

salon is JUST LIKE reichwing sites in regards to their egregious practice of CENSORSHIP...

not that it matters to snarky jerkoffs like kitt, pda, etc, but i have not graced saloon's pwetend pwogwessive fweespeech zone (except for one shot over the bow to the insufferable LWiMp) because i was CENSORED by unknown saloon keepers for unknown reasons...

(but that IS the nature of CENSORSHIP, isn't it ? numerous saloonists go nuts over 'anonymous' posters as cowardly, but won't raise a voice against TRULY cowardly (*AND* anti-american) CENSORSHIP, anonymous CENSORS, AND the unknown reasons for CENSORSHIP ? ? ?

um, h-word anyone ? )

i am fairly certain my CENSORSHIP had something to do with becoming exasperated by woman-camel-pig's non-stop mooning over chicks without dicks, and i told her to keep her clit in her pants in the comments of her -talk about supercilious- posting... now is *that* so bad ? ? ? hhh

stupid sheeple, don't even know -or care ?- when their 'freespeech zones' surround them EVERYWHERE, EVEN supposed progressive, freespeech-lovin' venues...

true story...

you can't 'demand'/get/deserve FREESPEECH HERE, and you fucktards are going to change the world ? ? ?

i don't think so...

the stuff directly CENSORED *here* at greenwald's territory, was only a series of posts of an updated list of kongresskritters contact numbers, eddresses, etc which i was providing as a public service to saloonists to justly excoriate their kongresskritters over the telecom immunity crap...

(gee, just how did that turn out, ultra-smart saloonies ? ? ? evil hee hee hee)

(of all places, i ran across a quarterhorse association which had the most up-to-date and comprehensive list of kongresskritters contact info)

sorry, but greenwald and/or salon (and nearly ALL the so-called pwogwessive blogosphere) DOES NOT believe in freespeech, and DOES practice CENSORSHIP, as i have born the brunt of it previously on this bastion of freedom of expression (*snort*)...

as is always the case, the CENSORS at saloon gave no 'reasons' for the CENSORSHIP, and certainly didn't identify themselves (as most CENSORS never do, so proud of their work); it is not surprising, as there are close to zero so-called progressive sites who will actually (*gasp*!) allow real, true, harsh, warts-and-all free speech...

again, chomsky has this issue nailed down such that is inescapable to all but the blinkered babbitry: if you do NOT defend the right of your worst enemies to spout their worst speech, you ARE NOT in favor of 'free speech', fucking period...

now, all you faux civil, faux pwogwessive hypocrites who simply can't abide the 'bad' words and unpopular sentiments of your fellow human beans need to shut the fuck up about that, and debate the issues at hand...

(assuming that *THIS* isn't CENSORED...)

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

eof

Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:35 AM

@ iokayusuck in a well (or whatever your stupid handle is)

1. me, a paid stooge of the reichwing ? ? ? what a joke... a tired, meaningless joke that doesn't apply, but what the hell can i expect from you, cogent discussion of the ACTUAL ISSUES i raised ? ? ?

(thanks for making my point about the jerkoffs at salon)

FYI, i plan on voting for the only real black person -not a power elite oreo- running for president, the candidate of my party (you know, useless greenies), cynthia mckinney (who has more cajones than ALL the saloonists put together)...

i guess that kind of renders your tiresome charge null and void... (DOUCHEBAG, i'm with derrick jensen: BLOW THE MOTHERFUCKER UP AND START OVER)

2. NO COMMENT on saloon's (and nearly ALL right AND left wing sites') CENSORSHIP policies ? ? ? does CENSORSHIP make us more free, iorwellonnan ? does salon get a free pass on CENSORSHIP because it is 'your' place to hang ? (and therefore simply *cain't* behave 'badly') ? what does that say about your 'principles' and consistency in applying them ? ? ?

(which i would aver is THE MAJOR THEME which -correctly so- runs throughout greenwald's estimable work...)

3. so tell me, HOW is salon's CENSORSHIP -you know- better (even admirable ?) compared to little green foosball's CENSORSHIP ? ? ?

... or are they BOTH engaging in aconstitutional, ANTI american actions when they CENSOR ? ? ?

stick to the issues, if you are able...

art guerrilla

aka ann archy

artguerrilla@alltel.net

(have at it, chickenlittles)

eof

Most Active Letters Threads

468

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
150

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon