Coulter knows the effect she has on liberals and neo-cons, she promotes it and exploits it.

The hateful gibberish she spews has no other purpose than to create controversy. Like the ID cretins and the promoters of the same sex marriage amendment she offers no reasonable or logical arguments for her positions, just start a fight and the ignorant knuckle-draggers howl their approval.

I don't think Coulter actually believes the shit she spouts, unlike "W" or Bill O'Reilly she only sounds like a retarded chimp. She is the ultimate scary clown.

Stephen Colbert's squewering of Bill O'Reilly is so funny because "The Dumbest Man on TV" is obviously a true believer. I can't imagine anyone mocking Ann Coulter. What's the point of parodying a clown?

Is there still hope?

Google links

Mother Teresa: 9,370,000

Ann Coulter: 9,240,000

I have no use for "jock culture" and despise christian right wingers but I think the Edwards campaign is better off without a self styled feminist who is too stupid to recognize the railroading inflicted on the Duke lacrosse players.

I hope someone on the left with a reputation for honesty fact checks the new MM offering. He doesn't seem to understand the meaning of the word "documentry." The sophmoric stunts in his last two offerings were bad enough but to discover he misled his audience on several points has seriously discredited him in my eyes. I would prefer his shadings of the truth and outright falsehoods be pointed out by suppoters of health care reform rather the directors of some HMO.

Thanks to walter_map for pointing out my misspelling of the word documentary. I evilly left out the "a".

I'm sorry you didn't address the point of my post but just slagged me as a "right-winger." We Canadian social democrats are keen to learn.

Guy Fawkes was a traitor and a religious terrorist.

Was the manufacture and disposal/recycling of the batteries taken into account?

I agree the MSM is shallow but using a journalists part time humour blog is not the way to highlight the fact.

You probably thought Randy Newman's "Short People" was an attack on the vertically challenged.

You do know Ralph Nader is only kidding, don't you?

Ha!

Gotcha.

Darn. I wanted to go back to Mr. Greenwald's page and say that I thought that SOME of the MSM was shallow. I would have also liked to point out ( as the boss has) that most of the things that outrage him were first published by the MSM.

I say I would have liked to but this morning's article in Salon has mysteriously disappeared! Or at least I can't find it.

Oh well.

Posted by: Boko999 | April 17, 2008 5:41 PM