Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

meffert

Published Letters: 635
Editor's Choice: 41

Friday, February 23, 2007 02:41 PM

I'm with dendrio

And while we're at it, lets make presidential elections by simple majority and no electoral college nonsense.

Monday, February 26, 2007 07:14 PM

A comment on the two comments above (below?)

1. It was part of the act

2. Why don't find out if it's true first...or don't we seem do that anymore? Or should we "call him on it" first and then make him prove that the "fact" is bullshit. I know, I know. Fact checkers cost money and slow down the swift-boating I suppose.

I thought it was pretty funny; certainly a better sense of humor than cheney.

Monday, February 26, 2007 07:18 PM
Original article: "Before they were nominees"

Puner, Bleedham

Forget those. Put the cook, the thief, the wife, the lover on your netflix list. And DON'T let the kiddies watch.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 09:28 AM

AC:

Did you actually read the story? Or are just here to pontificate in a troll-like fashion? Are you concerned at the Repub and administration sponsored VA budget cuts at the same time we are making disabled vets faster than we have since Vietnam? Do YOU really support the troops beyond a new refrigerator magnet every 2 years?

Thursday, March 1, 2007 03:27 PM

Pre-heard?

Forget wading through the rest of the BS. As soon as someone uses a non-word like "pre-heard", I lose interest in the conversation. If they can't state it plainly in real english, it's a lie they're trying to spin.

Thursday, March 1, 2007 03:32 PM

Only a bit more than more than 3 Friedman units...

...until the next election!

Monday, March 5, 2007 02:13 PM
Original article: Romney and Coulter, BFF?

Elephantman (or Joe)

Still you have to consider that what Kerry said about getting stuck in Iraq if you don't study hard is actually true, as is the slip from McCain and Obama that ultimately we will realize we have wasted the lives of some our finest citizens in a misbegotten war.

On the other hand, I don't believe John Edwards is "a faggot". In fact he stuck with his woman through thick and thin unlike some of your heroes (Guiliani, McCain, Gingrich,...) In fact at least he has a woman unlike some of your other heroes (Limbaugh, O'Reilly, ...)

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 12:21 PM

buffalonian,

You have to be careful about using irony around here. We often miss it. Your sarcasm may have been perfectly clear to you but we have people like Joe and Elephantman who say the most absurd things and at first you're thinking, "Wow, that's cleverly ironic" and then you realize, "Holy shit! They're serious!"

I got it, though.

Monday, March 12, 2007 04:24 PM

Joe's just mad ...

that Hagel seems to have broken from the neocon lockstep.

Whether he is still a robber baron/fascist at heart is less important to me now then that he is a voice of dissent regarding this horrible war that carries some authority in conservative circles. I may not vote for him for president, but I still appreciate him for what he's doing right now.

As for joe, some folks can never change, don't wanna, can't, won't, whatever. They will be left behind. Or just continue to sound like idjits. (I'm looking at you joe and elephantman)

Friday, March 16, 2007 09:50 AM

So, joe...

Did you know she sent her husband on a trip before you read it in the paper?

Do you think his visa was stamped with her name?

Do you think he introduced himself with "Hi, I was sent here by my wife"?

Do you think the folks in the Sudan knew he was married to someone that lives and works in the DC area? If they did, why do you think that makes it clear she's a spy?

Did it occur to you that the reason she kept her maiden name was to make it harder to connect the dots?

The smell test that was failed is this idea that the whole world knew about their connection.

She wasn't out until Novak said so. Novak said so because whitehouse officials told him. They told him because they wanted to discredit Wilson. None of these are in dispute. Take your smell test elsewhere...like firing US attorneys who "aren't loyal to the administration".

Friday, March 16, 2007 09:51 AM

Niger, not sudan

I have darfur on my mind. sorry. should proofread before I go wailing on Joe.

Friday, March 16, 2007 11:37 AM

I've really wanted to like Hagel

But keep remembering how I actually had enthusiasm for McCain a year or so ago and how betrayed I felt even though I'm an independant, and not a republican. I should probably stick to dems I gues.

Friday, March 16, 2007 01:27 PM
Original article: McCain and the "tar baby"

This isn't a new concept

During my dermatology training in the early nineties I referred to pair of patients getting Goeckermann treatment (Cover them in tar overnight and then subject to light therapy) as my tar babies. My supervisor turned pale and said that could be interpreted as racist and don't ever say that again. It had not occurred to me and certainly was not intended that way but I've not used the term since because I am teachable. That was 15 years ago. Where have these guys been that they would continue to be clueless to the potential objection to the term?

Thinking of disney with stereotypes of the day, check out the crows in Dumbo. Just as embarassing now as song of the south. They show up right after the "Dumbo gets drunk episode" which is much more of a psychedelic/peyote sort of experience for that lovable pachyderm than any alcoholic drink I've ever heard of.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007 01:45 PM

Not that it did them a whole lot of good with the mouthpiece

But I'm glad the very significantly timed gap in emails didn't get buried admidst the adolescent posturing and tortured confessions.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
60

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon