Letters to the Editor
Ghingis Can
Published Letters: 254 Editor's Choice: 2
-
No fingerprint, no Job!
[Read the article: No Social Security number? No problema]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Did anyone ever connect the dots as to why the IRS can use high speed computers to cross check social security and tax ID numbers so rich white people can pay their "fair share" of "progressive" income tax but at the same time the same computer can't be used by the INS to make sure they can work in the first place?
We could send 6 to 10 million illegals walking home today if we would just conduct instant background checks for employment and use secure biometric social security cards. The business whores and ethno-boosters can keep the changes from occuring for about another decade at most but we are going to have a very easy time hunting these guys down in the future. Better get amnesty now (oops did I say amnesty, I meant earned legalization). Which in my humble opinion is why there is such a push now by the pro-immigration side cut a deal now. Their leverage will erode as we cut off breeder documents such as drivers licenses and social security cards.
Theoretically illegals can still come and stay here it will be that they can't work, travel, recieve benefits, or conduct business. Kind of like tourists without money.
-
The Red Queen Theory of Evolution
[Read the article: Are women unmotivated earners?]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]It is very simple. Women's chances for genetic success is based on what they are born with. Whether you take an attractive or ugly female (the same age) rich or poor they will have the same number of children if that is what they want. Money and social status do not effect the above situation. The can control for quality but not quantity. At most a woman can have 10 - 15 children.
Men on the other hand can do something about their chances. A man has more sperm in one ejaculation than a woman has eggs in her entire life! That means men go for quantity not just quality. Women chose (if they can) based on either a man's appearance (try being short) or his social status (in this country that means money). Money is a proxy for intelligence. Although men can't change their height or jaw line they can change their social status. More money, more chances to breed.
That is evolution. Just don't tell that to Lawrence Summers.
-
Why does Geraldo always flak for illegals? He must be a racist.
[Read the article: Memo to Bill O'Reilly: More immigrants equals less crime]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The main reason the pro-illegal crowd gets so twitchy about deporting illegal alien prisoners (not undocumented) is that in their mind it sets the wrong precedent. If we can do it to a child killer we can do it to someone who has committed identity theft, is working illegally, and has overstayed their visa. I don't think I am going out on a limb by saying that most Americans don't want this guy here. I certainly don't.
Geraldo and many of his ilk are also against instant background checks for employment (the basic pilot program), building a fence along the US-Mexico border, for giving illegals breeder documents (drivers licenses, social security cards, etc.) and prohibiting police from arresting illegals and being pro-sanctuary city. In other words he wants as many people who look and sound like him here as possible irespective of whether or not they are welcome, wanted and needed by the majority (we are still a democracy, yes?).
His first tactic is to give a sob story. He likes to hold American born children of illegals out in front of the scofflaws like a shield but he did not like it too much when the tables where turned on him. He bellyaches about how we won't be able to do anything because Americans are so helpless as if I need him patronizing me. And when he is cornered he just calls anyone who disagrees with him a bigot.
-
All animals are equal but some are more equal than others
[Read the article: Firing Imus was the right thing]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I don't listen to Don Imus so his temporary sacking will not be missed by my ears. I do have to say however that I am reaching the end of my tolerance of people who's selective morality is a mace to blodgeon any white male who dares step over the line. Imus is an example to the rest of us.
Political correctness means any form of speach that people like me use that is critical of anyone of the "protected classes". Don Imus was not sacked because he said the nappy headded hoe word, he was sacked because he was not repersentitive of poeple like Joan. This is why the likes of Al Sharpton (Tawana Brawley), Jesse Jackson (spitting in sandwiches), etc. are still able to circulate in the mainstream. If they were white like me they would have been declared leppers a long time ago.
Every once in a while you have to kill a chicken in front of the monkeys to keep them in line.
-
Just an observation
[Read the article: Firing Imus was the right thing]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Memo to labc63:
I am glad you liked my posting. Perhaps you can articulate yourself a little better and tell us why you are so angry.
Oh, and I agree with you, those damn chimp wanabees, can't trust any of em. won't touch beef or pork but give em a chicken leg and they look like they have not eaten in a whole week. Those savages!
-
It would be so much easier if the killer looked like Timmothy McVeigh
[Read the article: "It's like when 9/11 happened"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I think it is the whites who should be fleeing. There are 33 mostly white people who were executed by a person of color and all we read about is backlash, backlash, backlash. It is now a staple of the liberal media to rush out the "backlash" label if the perp is female or non-white and the victim is someone like me. Now imagine if Don Imus had done this.
Common decency does not mean blaming the victim.