Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Svensker

Published Letters: 647

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:00 AM

There's a Big Difference Between ACLU & Klein, et al

The ACLU are commie pinko America-hating terrorist lovers. They will say anything just to be mean to America.

Joe Klein, et al, loves America. They only say good things about America and Americans.

Anyone who doesn't understand this is obviously a commie pinko America-hating terrorist lover, too.

Why can't you get this basic fact?

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 03:13 PM

@ Arne re Satire

We ought to seriously consider licensing satirists

The thing is, you don't have to do satire when you're talking about the Bush Regime. Just report verbatim what they're doing or saying, and it comes out sounding like satire. Or at least it used to, when the world contained more sanity.

Is it morning in America yet? I think someone changed my clock.

Monday, June 16, 2008 05:58 AM

Re: Impeachment off the table

What really tees me off about Pelosi's "impeachment is off the table" thing is that her putative reason for this stand is that impeachment would distract too much from the important work that the Congress has to get done. Apparently that important work consists of giving Herr Bush everything he wants, including telecom immunity. Wonder if Nancy will now have lots of time on her hands to help the Repubs push thru some new anti-habeas monstrosity?

Monday, June 16, 2008 01:00 PM

Just off phone with Hoyer's Office

Female staffer, a bit defensive, said right off the bat the the democracy.com article was wrong. When I asked about the ACLU and the NYT, she put me on hold, then came back and said that Hoyer was not about to announce a deal. When I pointed out that that statement could easily be parsed and meant nothing, she said he had been against telecom immunity in the past. So I told her that FISA was the deal breaker for me and for other activists and that past actions meant nothing unless future actions were consistent. They're obviously getting calls.

Nancy Pelosi's office said "we're not familiar with this issue" (huh?) and sent me to an answering machine.

Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:18 AM

This is the angriest I've ever been

During the Bush years, I have been horrified and appalled at what our government has done. I have been sickened by the torture, the lies, the killing. But, given the world view of the Bush Regime, none of what they were doing was surprising.

This FISA deal is different. I feel completely betrayed by Pelosi, Reid and Hoyer. (I also think Pelosi and Reid should be on the receiving end of some of the ads.) I am literally shaking with anger.

I told Hoyer's assistant that if she had any sense of honor, she would resign her job. Pelosi's office just gives you the "I know nothing, please leave a message" -- very polished and completely non-reactive. The message I left on Pelosi's machine was not polished nor non-reactive.

Also just donated more than I could afford to ActBlue.

It's time to make these bastards pay.

Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:22 AM

Phone #s

From Kos's page, here are #s (they all worked when I called):

Call Barack Obama and urge him to make a public statement reiterating his opposition to telco amnesty. His opposition could kill this deal: Phone (202) 224-2854, Fax (202) 228-4260

Call Steny Hoyer and tell him this is a bad deal: Phone (202) 225-4131, Fax (202) 225-4300

Call Nancy Pelosi and urge her to pull the bill from the House schedule: Phone (202) 225-4965, Fax (202) 225-8259

Here's a link to Kos's page with more #s for BlueDogs

http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/19/115414/787/632/538388

Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:34 AM

What about Leahy and Conyers?

Initial reports said that Hoyer bypassed Leahy and Conyers (chair of the Senate & House Judiciary Committees) to get this deal done. Is there any chance some pressure could get them loudly opposing this?

Just a thought.

Friday, June 20, 2008 11:18 AM

Called Hoyer's Office

Took me almost an hour to get through and the mailbox was full, but finally got a young woman:

Hoyer's Office: "Congressman Hoyer's Office!"

Me: "Hi, I just called to congratulate Congressman Hoyer on the great job he did today on FISA. Really well done."

Hoyer's Office: "Oh! Well, thank you!"

Me: "Yes, I didn't realize a Democrat could capitulate so completely to President Bush. And Dick Cheney sends his regards and thanks, too. Great job screwing the American people!"

Hoyer's Office: "Oh. Ummm. I'll pass along your comments." Click.

It was childish, but I enjoyed it.

Whatever it takes, Glenn, I'm on board.

Saturday, June 21, 2008 10:33 AM

Thanks

Dear Glenn, this column is exactly why I read you. Thank you for clarifying the issues so well.

Saturday, June 21, 2008 03:02 PM

P.Luk & HRC

Pluk, if you were disparaging Obama's pragmatism but were planning to vote for Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, I might take your moaning and groaning seriously.

But since you hold up Hillary as the sine qua non of principled purity, I'm too busy laughing to take you seriously.

Monday, June 23, 2008 10:21 AM
Original article: The New Republic syndrome

Scoop Jackson

"I'm not a hawk or a dove. I just don't want my country to be a pigeon."

-- Henry M. Jackson

One would like to think old Scoop wouldn't have allowed his country to become Iran's pigeon. Who can say?

-- L.W.M

Scoop Jackson was one of the original neocons, and a perfect example of what is wrong with the Democratic Party. Rahm and Steny are his heirs (not to mention the loathsome Abrams, Perle, et al).

Glenn & Co.'s efforts to push the baby bird Scoops out of the Democratic nest is one that should be fervently by anyone who is not interested in being part of a militarized empire.

Monday, June 23, 2008 01:06 PM
Original article: The New Republic syndrome

The first objection to H.R. 6304 has been made -- Pow Wow

Do you know who made the objection?

Reid is really a snake, isn't he?

Thursday, June 26, 2008 09:51 AM

It's the "Sides" Thing Again

When you view politics as simply a team sport, then your "side" has to be good, even if they are doing what you were screaming was horrible when the other "side" did it.

Witness the left supporting Clinton in Serbia while the right had conniption fits, and now its vice versa. But apparently, many folks on either side of the aisle only argue from the "team" viewpoint rather than principle.

It's depressing.

I'll still vote for Obama, because another Republican administration would be disastrous, but I am not persuaded that many of the folks here who vote Dem will be critical of an Obama administration for doing something that caused them to scream bloody murder when Bush did it.

Most Active Letters Threads

366

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
198

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
98

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
49

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon