Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Paul Daniel Ash

Published Letters: 2405
Editor's Choice: 3

Tuesday, November 6, 2007 01:12 PM
Original article: The Ron Paul phenomenon

@scottfrost

The problem I see with this elucidation of rights is how one goes about guaranteeing them. In other words, without the positive right of society to enable a police force, how do you enforce your negative right to be safe from murderers and thieves?

I have a feeling the answer has something to do with a lot of guns, but I'll await your reply.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007 09:46 AM
Original article: The Ron Paul phenomenon

"our so called leaders keep pressing the issue of a single unified world government"

Who would that be, exactly?

Seriously. Is there anyone, anywhere within reach of a single lever of power who is "pressing" this issue?

Thursday, November 8, 2007 10:47 AM

@NoahC

Don't feed the trolls?

It's a suggestion that many have tried to make before, and no doubt others will make again. I tend to agree with you, though I have seen many well-written posts here that elegantly dispatch points made in posts that I would have thought not worth the effort.

Your Mileage May Vary, as we old-timers say... it seems to me that trolls are like mosquitoes. Some of us may try to ignore them, and some may swat and itch. Either way, they are here to stay.

Thursday, November 8, 2007 01:15 PM

SlackDaemon.c ERROR

Line = 1

The identifier "void" is undefined.

Thursday, November 8, 2007 04:50 PM

"I'm not really responding to "it" directly"

Sorry, that just made me think "it puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again..."

As I've mentioned before, I see shooter 0-for-2 as sort of like the online version of one's annoying little brother/sister. Getting under your skin is a "win" for her/him, regardless of how she/he gets it.

That is the game. The primary question is whether it's a game you want to play (the secondary one being, of course, whether you want to drag the whole comments thread along for the ride).

Friday, November 9, 2007 12:07 PM

"Please can we just ignore shooter"

No.

I kind of wish we would, but nah gun happen. For good or ill, he is as much a part of this place as WT and bebop-o. He's target practice. He's a scratching post. He's Lord Foul the Despiser, the one you love to hate. He's here to validate the prejudices of those of us who believe (or want to) that there's no one intellectually honest on the other side.

In my experience, they do exist, but they have to much self-respect to be trolls on progressive blogs.

Sunday, November 11, 2007 08:02 PM
Original article: The Smart car is coming

Um...

I suppose it has a chance in California, but a place where you could ever get more than 12 inches of snow? Dubious.

The car is sold in Canada and I do believe it sometimes snows there.

Monday, November 12, 2007 10:57 AM

@Paul Dirks

the utter lack of empathy that seems to be a defining characteristic of thirty-somethings these days

I am going to call you out on that comment, as I've come to expect, quite frankly, better of you.

"Utter" lack of empathy is a "defining" characteristic of the whole cohort of people from age thirty to thirty-nine? Could you have painted with any broader a brush, Other Paul?

There are many ways in which society has coarsened, and we certainly are well-marinated in the "I got mine" mentality here in God-blessed America. But I don't see empathy as any more lacking in the thirtysomes (I'm 41, FWIW) than it is in my own age group or those much older or younger.

And I have to say, short of at the Naval Observatory, I don't see an "utter" lack of empathy at all.

I generally make allowances for hyperbole, but this one was a bit hard for me to swallow.

Monday, November 12, 2007 11:32 AM

@Other Paul

Apology not needed, but accepted... I am equally dismayed by the shift of the cosidetto "Overton window" into realms I consider barely human - but I guess I blame my elders, not the younguns, for that!

I don't have any guesses as to why. "9/11" is certainly part of the reason (and note that I include the govern/media response as part of the overall event), along with the long-term trend of we Americans solving our problems through violence.

When I think of these times, it's Burke and Yeats who come to mind the most. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.

Monday, November 12, 2007 12:01 PM

Another "oldster" speaks

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -- Plato

Some dead white men are worth quoting. When John Lennon was my age, he'd been dead for a year.

I'll say no more.

Monday, November 12, 2007 12:20 PM

"I'd REALLY like to know why they and their rhetoric are worthy of the consideration we are providing."

They you REALLY should have read - what? - like the fifth post in this thread:

http://tinyurl.com/2tzfdc

Tuesday, November 13, 2007 02:30 PM

Simple answers to simple questions

How does godless evolution explain human evil?

It doesn't.

Neither does it explain the movement of planets in their orbits, four-man backfield defense or the popularity of NASCAR.

It actually has nothing to do with any of these things.

Thanks for asking, though.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:00 PM

kenjitsushin gasshō

Namaste.

Japanese Buddhists call it gasshō. It has twelve forms, the first of which I learned as a Jodo-shu adherent: called the kenjitsushin gassho - "steadfast-being-gasshō." It is the symbol of the multitude of different things being, at the same time, One.

Respect is the key, and something this group never extends toward its opponents.

And humility, and likewise.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007 03:10 PM

"Why call them Democratic?"

Gonna try and spitball an answer to that one... 'cause it's what they're called?

Friday, November 16, 2007 10:43 AM

fighting the desire to title my post "no rhetorical shit..."

With due respect to TomT, it doesn't seem to have been Glenn's point that Bush's lip service to Constitutional values was a "rhetorical shift," rather that it was such obvious bullshit doublespeak that it seemed as if Colbert had written it...

Friday, November 16, 2007 01:07 PM

Schopenhauer anticipated old zero-for-two

http://www.searchlores.org/schopeng.htm

#3: Attack something different than what was asserted.

If zero-for-two hasn't hit all thirty-eight ways yet, hold on: she/he will.

Monday, November 19, 2007 12:12 PM

'should we all still love Israel?'

So we have this one guy telling us we "all... love Israel" and one-or-more anonymi castigating us for supposedly blaming "teh j00z" for everything.

I guess ya just sees wot ya wants ta see...

Tuesday, November 20, 2007 03:23 PM

@derbig LOL

I agree.

The one where he was talking about his husband cheating on him with his sister was like, ew. Isn't that why we have Springer?

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
273

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon