Yeah they have a record for picking winners. You Obamatrons are so deeply foolish.

We don't know the depths of Obama's incompetence.

And we don't want to find out when it's too late, after he proves how "open minded" he is meeting with Iranian terrorists.

Potentially worse than Bush? Absolutely.

People who love their country understand the problem with Wright and the problem with Obama's wife saying she was never proud of the country before he ran for president.

MoveOn and Kos don't get it but for most Americans, the choice is between Clinton and McCain.

Obama isn't an option and if he is nominated the entire Democratic party won't be an option for a long time to come after his opponents get done with him.

Barack Obama will not win Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania in the general election.

Barack Obama is currently TIED with McCain in MASSACHUSSETTS with Hillary Clinton leading McCain by 15 (SurveyUSA)

Barack Obama can win 1000 college students in an Idaho caucus but he loses when millions of Democrats vote in a big state primary. It's about to happen again. He will lose in November and drag down the entire party with him.

The superdelegates know it and if they do the right thing they will reject this loser.

will never be president. Get your heads out of the sand. The superdelegates exist to prevent the Democrats from nominating losers like Obama who appeal to people who like to lose.

Hillary Clinton is not going to be run out of the race and since she is a candidate who loves America, she isn't going to turn the nomination over to Barack "God Damn America" Obama without a fight.

That's fine with us Democrats who also love America. We want the effective and experienced candidate and we will not vote Democratic if the other one is nominated. So it makes no difference to us if Obama's general election campaign is damaged in the process.

Get it?

The Clinton-Obama ticket deal should have been made months ago. Clinton voters will NOT come back to the fold in November if she doesn't top the ticket because they don't think BO is capable so a large portion will defect to McCain.

Obama voters would be there in November if he was on the ticket as VP because their threatened defections are only about sour grapes, not qualifications. VP would be good enough for them whether they admit it here or not.

Add in the Florida and Michigan farces and there is no other way for Democrats to win.

Yes, Clinton supporters would accept BO in the VP position because we don't think he would realistically become president for another 8 years, if then.

We might not like the idea of a potential President Obama but we would roll that die if it meant a Democratic victory this time. And who knows, maybe in 8 years Obama won't be threatening to negotiate with terrorists like he is now.

If you're so willing to bow down to what the media gives you, I can guess that you were a proud Bush supporter?

Did an Obama fan seriously just type that?

Republicans will say "she stole it"? Republicans? As in Brooks Brothers rioting Republicans?

I'm laughing so hard I can't breathe.

I agree with Carville. Richardson waited to endorse to see what kind of deal he could get. Clinton didn't need him for Latino support, Obama did and probably made an offer he couldn't refuse, the political equivalent of 30 pieces of silver.

I just read Obama is calling on Clinton to denounce the letter from the DCCC donors alerting Pelosi that Democrats will lose their support if they insist on enforcing the arbitrary "pledged delegate" position.

The Obama camp says the letter amounts to "extortion" and has demanded Clinton denounce it.

Who the hell is Barack Obama to demand someone denounce PRIVATE CITIZENS for writing to politicians or denounce PRIVATE CITIZENS for telling those politicians they will no longer support them?

Obama voted yea, Clinton voted no:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Feb17.html

Congress today handed President Bush a major second-term victory, passing legislation he had advocated during his reelection campaign to restrict class-action lawsuits.

The bill, the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, passed the House today by a vote of 279-149, after having sailed through the Senate last week in a 72-26 vote. Bush is expected to sign it into law Friday.

Critics charged that the legislation would deprive Americans of legal recourse when they were wronged by powerful corporations.

"This bill is the Vioxx protection bill, it is the Wal-Mart protection bill, it is the Tyco protection bill, and it is the Enron protection bill," said Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), the Associated Press reported.

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) called the bill "the final payback to the tobacco industry, to the asbestos industry, to the oil industry, to the chemical industry at the expense of ordinary families who need to be able go to court to protect their loved ones when their health has been compromised."

So your definition of a guilty party is someone who has been "accused" or "sued"?

Larry Sinclair is suing the Obama campaign for defamation of character. Sinclair says he picked up Obama in a bar and performed oral sex on him in 1999. Sinclair claims they shared cocaine.

Sinclair has "accused" Obama and he has "sued" him.

According to John Anderson, Barack Obama is guilty of having a sexual tryst with Larry Sinclair and snorting coke with him.

The Obama Rules.

Another reason I won't be voting for BO. wiki:

Casey, like his father, is strongly pro-life. He has publicly stated his support for overturning Roe v. Wade.

When asked to state a position on legalizing same-sex marriage in Pennsylvania, Casey responded "Oppose."