Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 375
Editor's Choice: 2
Now they're complaining she won't surrender her delegates immediately. They know how weak their candidate is.
The fun part starts now. Helping McCain defeat Barack Dukakis and humiliate his vulgar racist obnoxious fan club.
Now they're complaining she won't surrender her delegates immediately. They know how weak their candidate is.
The fun part starts now. Helping McCain defeat Barack Dukakis and humiliate his vulgar racist obnoxious fan club.
Many forget that the Clintons almost ruined the party during their eight years of highly personal rule.
When Barack Dukakis loses in November you Obamapaths will claim he did more to "save" the party while "the Clintons almost ruined" it.
That's how insane you are.
I vote for politicians but I don't do what they tell me to do. Endorsements are meaningless.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2DECDKOFnw
Her biggest weakness to my eyes that she was really a regular Democrat who went for the power. It showed in her campaign.
What does that make Barack Dukakis? In his state senate race the "community organizer" was well funded and lawyered up enough by his corrupt Chicago machine to challenge the signature petitions of four poor Democratic opponents and have them all thrown out (challenging signatures for being printed and not written). All so Barry could run as the only candidate on the ballot and deprive voters of a choice.
Scum in any ethical person's book.
I take it you want roe wade overturned and the Bush tax cuts forever....
I'm good with abortion at the state level. I hate the Bush tax cuts but Barry's performance in foreign policy would be of greater national consequence and irreparable. His economic performance is an unknown but it would be a likely disaster too.
Barry is beholden to the anti-war Move On lefty left and too confident in his ability to persuade lunatic dictators with words. He would fail to act against Iran or anyone else.
your messiah getting his four opponents removed from the ballot in Illinois by challenging petition signatures for being printed instead of written in cursive?
You're impressed.
and you know what really really really sucks?
WARS OF CHOICE started by ignorant stubborn fear obsessed hawks, like yourself.
Know what sucks more? Nukes in NYC.
I opposed the Iraq war but Barack Dukakis would have voted for it if the polls showed it would hurt him not to. Just like Kerry, Edwards and Clinton. If you don't believe that you don't know your messiah.
He would also hesitate to engage in a necessary war if he thought the Move On lefty left would cost him the next election.
U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald said the Rezko verdict represented “an antidote to the poison of corruption” that trial testimony alleged included the fixing of state boards that controlled a $40 billion pension fund and made major decisions about million-dollar hospital construction.
He expressed hope it would have an effect on Illinois politicians.
“If morals don’t get to them, I hope the fear of going to jail does,” Fitzgerald told reporters.
Never got any thoughts...
...on Obamas visionary political approach of winning elections by getting his opponents removed from the Illinois ballot by challenging petition signatures? How about his backstabbing the people who helped him in his political career with the petition challenge? You'd think he would have had the confidence to win that election on the power of his ideas and character. I guess he did not have the confidence, ideas, or character. Maybe the "new" politics of change aligns with the "old" No honor amoung thieves approach to politics.
I also noticed nobody offered to square this scumbaggery with Obama's claim of representing a new political approach. Cultists usually just suppress negative incoming information about their messiah.
Barack Dukakis and his followers take themselves way too seriously.
This show will probably do more to deter teenage viewers from becoming parents than all the parental and societal lecturing in the world.
Naturally the crackpots at the APA are in hysterics over the thought that a kid might "endure" five minutes of diaper rash or not listening to Baby Einstein CDs.
Does your mother think these actions and disclosures are dandy, or would she worry about your lifestyle?
That's the funny thing about being 24. You don't know much about anything, so you can't write serious defenses of much of anything, including casual sex.
Tell you what, write another article when you have an adolescent daughter. Let us know if you'll be alright with her telling you the same stories about her sex life beginning at 16.
When, yes "when" you're not cool with it, think about your objections. They won't have a damn thing to do with men, feminism, or the market value of sex, and they will have little to do with disease or pregnancy.
You seem smart, so try putting yourself in those future shoes, then write an article about what goes through your mind when your daughter writes an article like this and calls you up to chat with you and dad about her latest casual conquest.
You O-bots keep whining that you'll never, ever, support Hillary Clinton if she and Bill refuse roll over to your demands of enthusiastic support. You want this kind of support despite The One's attempt to rewrite history by trashing the Clinton presidential and race relations records.
Guess what? Millions of Clinton supporters have already done what you're threatening to do should Hillary Clinton ever run again.
We've decided we will never, ever, support your candidate because of the damage his campaign and you have done to our party. A McCain presidency represents a better outcome for us in terms of party and country.
We as Democrats just can't support your celebrity candidate in good conscience. Our candidate had a record of performance and dedication any Democrat can be proud of. Obama's got nothing.
Get it?