Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

ArthurDental

Published Letters: 42     Editor's Choice: 1

  • For those who said Obama didn't complain about racism

    [Read the article: My last word (for now) on sexism]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Here's a little truth for ya.

    http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/17133626.html

  • Have you seen Obama giving the finger to Clinton, twice?

    [Read the article: Don't blame San Francisco for Obama's "Bittergate"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Different venues, but the same finger at the same point in the same speech.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No

    What can I say.

  • Classic attack dog

    [Read the article: Don't blame San Francisco for Obama's "Bittergate"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Launch personal attack on questioner and avoid the question.

    Great job.

  • Obama supporters, let's get back to the topic at hand

    [Read the article: When no story becomes the story]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    No, it's not too early. Contrary to popular myths, election polls almost always get the winner right, even if they're way off on the margin. Furthermore, exit polls are considered in many countries more accurate than official counts due to issues like mechanical/procedural failures and plain fraud. The Florida incident is mischaracterized as an exit poll failure, when news media recount of the entire state showed Al Gore had indeed won.

    It's time we get other countries to monitor our voting booths. The more informed people know all about black-box voting and other shenanigans. All those broken machines and long lines would not be acceptable in other developed countries.

    Alright, Obama supporters can now go back to taking any chance they get to take potshots at Clinton, although I'd prefer them posting in a blog that actually discusses the pros and cons of the candidates.

  • Some of you need to re-read the article again

    [Read the article: Obama is wrong about the gas tax]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    "Obama did learn from Illinois' gas tax holiday. Sure, 60% of the tax cut may have made it to the pump price (quiz: where'd the other 40% go?), but 100% of the lost revenues either resulted in more debt, loss of services, or were funded by other taxes."

    You obviously forgot about the windfall tax on oil company profits. Other counter-arguments are similarly misinformed.

    And this comes from me, a carbon-tax proponent.

  • It's time to stop being apologists

    [Read the article: Quote of the Day: Barack Obama ]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    This isn't even the first time he called a woman "sweetie." Obama camp's refusal to acknowledge their candidate's sexism has lost them the white women vote, just as Clinton's lost the African-American vote. (Yes, race seems to be a deeper ridge.)

    A few other sexist comments:

    http://2politicaljunkies.blogspot.com/2008/03/obama-foreign-policy-adviser-resigns.html

    Obama apologizes for calling reporter "sweetie"

    http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/14/ap5011317.html

    Obama flips off Clinton, literally

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

    Obama's "likable" comment

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/01/youre_likable_enough_costs_oba.html

    Can someone find me a reference of the previous sweetie comment?

  • not really

    [Read the article: See? See why I get hysterical?!?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    >> How about a broader context? (No pun intended!)

    > Men and womean are made to feel inferior or somehow flawed by many features of typical Western corporate life. Conduct the same experiment and ask questions that require that an applicant be fine tuned to a particular culture, whether a national or corporate culture, and its worldview and values, and viola--I'll bet you can replicate the same results...half the people will blame themselves...and the more subtle the insult, the more grevious the injury.

    I think it's important to speak of sexism, racism, etc, by itself, in such cases, rather than generalizing. They affect different people, may not use the same means, etc. For instance, discrimination based on sexual orientation is still not against the law because there's no such law. Sexism isn't racism isn't nationalism isn't religion etc.

    And it's naive to say the least to blame it on Western culture. In many if not most Asian countries (which I'm more familiar with since that's where I was from) sexism is often still publicly acceptable.

  • bull

    [Read the article: Can't Darwin and God get along?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    From talking about supposed holes in evolution evidence to outdated ideas about consciousness, this guy makes the same mistakes that non-scientists often make when they criticize science. Of course we're not going to find every single piece of the puzzle, of our past. The world's messy and not everything survives. If there were an uninterrupted chain of evidence I would actually believe in God, because it's hard to imagine how everything that needs to be preserved actually is.

    Darwin and God can get along but science and God cannot. There is no room for something you cannot describe. Science isn't knowledge, but the system of finding out about nature through nothing but a rigorous routine of formulating hypotheses, designing and running experiments, and throwing out any idea that is contradicted by facts.

    Templeton Foundation among others have tried to prove effectiveness of prayers, etc, but no evidence so far has been found in anything other than religious holy texts. Isn't that strange?

    90-95% of eminent scientists, those who produced substantial contributions, ie. peer-reviewed papers, do not believe in God. If there were really any evidence for it, the numbers wouldn't have been so lopsided.

    It's always the religious people who try to say whether science is compatible. Scientists usually just wish to get back to their work.

  • Re: Fear and Loathing in America

    [Read the article: Barack Obama's super marketing machine]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Oh, so the GOP does it and it makes it all ok.

    No wonder he voted for FISA.

  • Refreshing to read about a smart actor

    [Read the article: Amanda Peet: "Sorry about that 'parasites' thing"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Don't forget those parents are exposing their kids to the risk of uncontrolled infection.

  • With that kind of hatred

    [Read the article: Hillary on Tuesday, Tim or Jack on Wednesday?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    you wonder why they wouldn't "shut up."

    Frankly it's disgusting how so many people have so much hatred in their hearts, and see what we've got now - a neo-con in Democratic clothing.

    Welcome to the Party.

  • Don't forget Obama's a Blue Dog

    [Read the article: Let's give "Blue Dogs" the boot]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    From attacking universal health plans to proposing to leave up to 50,000 troops in Iraq, from trying outlaw most late-term abortions to voting for FISA and gutting the Constitution, this is not a progressive that we're voting for.

    This is the problem with the Democrats and even so-called liberals. When push comes to shove, they'd rather shut their eyes and vote what the media tells them to.

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox