Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

BobbyG

Published Letters: 881
Editor's Choice: 20

Friday, May 23, 2008 07:41 PM

Steve Fox

Maybe it wasn't a dog whistle, maybe it was simply a case of DISQUALIFYING STUPIDITY.

The RFK assassination allusion was entirely unnecessary to proffer the general argument for staying in (i.e., that primary races historically have gone on through June sometimes). It was, consequently, gratuitous in the extreme. Done intentionally, it was scurrilous. The only alternative is gross political incompetence indicative of likely Presidential performance.

Take your pick.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 02:01 PM

Pul-eeeze

"The world is divided between people who consider Bill and Hillary Clinton monsters, and people who don't."

_______

No, the world is populated by two kinds of people, those (like you) who see everything in black and white terms, and those who don't, LOL.

Your HRC slave-itude could not be more transparent.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 02:26 PM

Mike leP

Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 02:29 PM

What Hillary really meant to say was

"what if one of those bitter hardworking American snipers was aiming at me and hit Obama by mistake?"

That's all. She was just tired, and it didn't come out right.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008 04:54 PM

All a big misunderstanding

What Hillary really meant to say was simply "what if one of those bitter hardworking white American snipers was aiming at me and hit Obama by mistake?"

That's all. She was just tired, and it didn't come out right.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008 04:31 PM

I'm still tryin' to understand

how two gay or lesbian people getting married affects my successful 34 year hetero marriage in any way.

The long answer: It does not.

Thursday, May 29, 2008 09:55 AM

Pelosi now getting the testicular fortitude

to call "Bullshit" on Her Rightful Highness:

"(CNN) – Hillary Clinton has hinted that she is prepared to take her fight to fully seat Florida and Michigan all the way to the party's convention in late August, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says that's not going to happen.

In an interview with her hometown newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, the California Democrat said she is prepared to "step in" if the presidential race does not resolve itself by the end of next month.

"I will step in," Pelosi told the paper. "Because we cannot take this fight to the convention…It must be over before then."

Pelosi, who will serve as chair of the convention, has largely stayed on the sidelines during her party's prolonged primary race. But the House Speaker has said Democratic superdelegates should not overturn the pledged delegate winner, and has warned of irreparable harm if they do so. Barack Obama officially won the majority of pledged delegates in last Tuesday's primary contests, though it's been clear for several weeks Clinton could not overtake him in that category..."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/29/pelosi-prepared-to-step-in-to-end-race/

Friday, May 30, 2008 08:09 AM

dem2win

"comments that were misinterpreted by mainstream national media"

________

There was NO possibility of misinterpreting "sniper fire." None whatsoever. That was my tipping point. Subsequently cemented by "hardworking white Americans."

Saturday, May 31, 2008 10:53 AM

404!

http://hillaryis404.org

;)

Monday, June 2, 2008 10:20 AM

Taylor, STFU

I hope that he will clinch by the minimum +4 or more. Then all this wailing can just go away.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008 01:35 PM

What a Prenup THAT will require

Plus he'll have to hire a food taster.

Tuesday, June 3, 2008 01:58 PM

Give her

Senate Majority Leader.

Think about it. Hardball policy wonk knife fighter pol. About the only place she could do any real good. Get rid of that Gooper-appeasing wimp (my senator, btw) Harry Reid.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008 06:59 PM

Hillary lost because

her campaign had no strategy. When the wheels started coming off the assumed anointment, all she had were disjointed, reactive (and increasingly lowball) tactics, not a "strategy." The Obama campaign, on the other hand, had a coherent national strategy from the outset. They had accurately analyzed the crazy-quilt Democratic primary "system," and their tactics were deployed in a manner consistent with maxing the returns indicated by the strategy.

She got beat by a superior campaign strategy artfully implemented. McBu'ush, you're next, My Good Friend.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008 07:06 PM
Original article: The other 18 million

I repeat:

Hillary lost because her campaign had no strategy. When the wheels started coming off the assumed anointment, all she had were disjointed, reactive (and increasingly lowball) tactics, not a "strategy." The Obama campaign, on the other hand, had a coherent national strategy from the outset. They had accurately analyzed the crazy-quilt Democratic primary "system," and their tactics were deployed in a manner consistent with maxing the returns indicated by the strategy.

She got beat by a superior campaign strategy artfully implemented. McBu'ush, you're next, My Good Friend.

Thursday, June 5, 2008 07:38 PM

Spare Change?

http://www.bgladd.com/SpareChange.jpg

Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:28 PM

Amazing

How little campaign talent ten million dollars buys anymore.

Friday, June 13, 2008 10:02 AM
Original article: Quote of the day

Legend In His Own Mind Scalia

loves to otherwise pontificate about being a constitutional "textualist," which he differentiates semantically from that of being an Original Intent lover. Meaning that, his job as he sees it is simply to decide cases on the basis of what he determines that the words of the pertinent clause of the Constitution meant to the polity at large at the time of enactment (of course, we can assume that there was interpretative unanimity in the streets back then, right?)

So, consequently, whining about the imagined terrible upshot of this decision is, well, out of his pay grade. Others are lawfully charged with tending to those concerns.

How this cat ever got his rep as this monumental intellectual/jurisprudential badass escapes me.

Saturday, June 21, 2008 09:52 AM

Two core causes of the American revolution

were the widely despised British Crown "General Warrants" and "Writs of Assistance" enforced against the American colonials. Now, I spent a good bet of time yesterday slogging through the details of the HR 6304 which passed, and while IANAL, it's pretty clear to me that both of these contemptible tactical elements (which led directly to our 4th Amendment, btw) are embedded overtly in this legislation, in addition to the odious "private bill" aspects conferring blanket retroactive and prospective immunity on the telecoms.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
364

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
264

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon