Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

BobbyG

Published Letters: 876
Editor's Choice: 20

Wednesday, October 17, 2007 05:16 PM

clamorem et uthesium

According to the most renowned Constitutional historians (e.g., Cuddihy), "clamorem et uthesium" a.k.a. "Hue and Cry," the medieval practice of ad hoc law enforcement impressment/deputization of the private sector by governments evolved into a core reason for the American revolution, i.e., colonial hatred of the British Crown's widespread issuance of General Warrants (non-specific and of indefinite duration) and Writs of Assistance (the modern equivalent of which is typified by this whole Bu'ush era telecoms' mess).

Specifically, the Framers wrote the exact language of the 4th Amendment to proscribe such practices.

More generally, the Bu'ush adminstration is trying to privatize everything in sight in part to end-run Constitutional strictures, owing to the bulk of case law declaring that private entities' activities are not subject to Constitutional limitations -- that the aggrieveds' only remedies are tort claims (which is what the telecoms are now frantically trying to nullify in advance).

Such flies directly and glaringly in the face of "conservative" Original Intent, though.

Writs of Assistance revisited.

Thursday, October 18, 2007 08:27 AM

Beyond the egregious summary granting of retroactive immunity

is the implicit -- nearly explicit -- precedent granting of the green light for limitless clamorem et uthesium / Writs of Assistance secret surveillance going forward, with no independent oversight whatsoever.

Whether this odious legislation will ultimately be found "unconstitutional" is far from certain, Given what Bu'ush has done to the Supreme Court thus far.

“I give you a Republic if you can keep it.”

- Ben Franklin

Sorry, Ben. It was nice while it lasted.

Friday, October 19, 2007 08:30 PM
Original article: Don't think of a sick child

Greg in FL

Nice letter.

Those who evince this smarmy narcissistic disdain for distressed fellow citizens would typically be the first and loudest clamoring for their "rights" once struck by misfortune themselves.

Y'know, all you greedy tax-hating "conservatives," the collapsing interstate highway bridge doesn't give a rat's ass about how much bread you got should you be crossing it when the structure fails.

And, I'm sure every legislator that voted to uphold (lifetime ward of the socialized health care state) Bu'ush's SCHIP veto avails him or herself to every penny of "federalized health care" to which they're "entitled."

Monday, October 22, 2007 08:25 AM

This is good news

Take this scummy prick and his thug army down.

Friday, November 9, 2007 08:59 AM
Original article: Worst. President. Ever.

"Tax breaks for wealthy people...

"Tax breaks for wealthy people stimulate the economy"

Supposedly, wealthy people need tax breaks to encourage them to invest. I never believed this load of hogwash...

______

Yeah, similarly with all manner of tax breaks, long term. The market value of my house has embedded within it the value of my tax deductions. Were they not available, the nominal "value" would be decremented by roughly that amount. Taxation as a socioeconomic policy carrot is way overrated.

Saturday, November 10, 2007 05:21 PM
Original article: The cost of war

"He's a good man,

and we're gonna git 'im a new face."

Tuesday, November 13, 2007 09:04 PM
Original article: Did Rupert help Rudy?

When she was screwing Bernie,

was it part of her investigative reporter / writer thing? "Research"?

Wednesday, November 28, 2007 03:32 PM

This is great news

This puke is a dangerous man. Hard to imagine someone worse than Bu'ush, but Rudy is just that. May the dirt continue to surface.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007 06:27 PM

From the Institute For The In-Depth Study of Blinding Glimpses of The Obvious

... why was the cost of the security for these particular trips buried in the budgets of various obscure agencies?

_____

Asked and answered.

Friday, November 30, 2007 08:09 AM
Original article: "Doesn't Add Up"

New campaign mantra

"69/11 changed everything."

Wednesday, December 5, 2007 01:04 PM
Original article: An Iran bombshell for Bush

Nulla Sallus

With that talent for concise straw man hyperbole, you could easily work in the Bu'ush administration.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007 07:08 PM

Jim

LOL! I made that same "Scientology" analogy yesterday.

Like the eminent Simon Blackburn ("Think", "Being Good") noted, we can't just be satisfied with principles of morality, we gotta have our myriad (and contradictory or otherwise illogical) exemplar Stories. Which, of course, then become the whole bizarre, convoluted deal.

Thursday, December 6, 2007 11:13 AM

Freedom REQUIRES

Holy Underwear.

Thursday, December 6, 2007 06:44 PM

Freedom REQUIRES religion?

Home don't tink so, Mork Romney. Nahnoo, nahnoo.

Y'know. I'm pretty agnostic (bordering on "soft" atheist), but right now I'm managing a Christmas CD release produced by a couple of my friends (click my name), simply because it's a beautiful work of musical art, notwithstanding that I'm way Life of Brian on the whole Jesus thing. I love my Amy Grant Christmas CDs as well. When I'm at my Mother-in-Law's in Alabama, I bow my head during grace at the supper table and at the long-winded bible-thumping "invocations" at the high school basketball games, etc., out of simple tolerant respect for my in-laws. They, in turn, don't rub my nose in their faith.

I refuse to accept second-class citizenship, Mr. Romney, because I don't require "religion" to be the law-abiding, documentably productive, loyal, and moral person that I am.

So, STFU.

Mork.

Thursday, December 6, 2007 06:59 PM

zackandzanesmom

Best laugh of the evening. Thanks. Joe Conason's publication history and political credibility track records speak for themselves.Mork and Huck are two patent phonies deserving of being called out relentlessly.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007 01:07 PM

Jesus is

SO pre- 9/11.

Most Active Letters Threads

444

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
68

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon