Letters to the Editor
LeCastor
Published Letters: 1916 Editor's Choice: 86
-
Brightstar
[Read the article: Hysteria: It's baa-aack ...]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]"Women don't want to take responsiblity for a single thing they are "designed for"? Pray tell, who "designed" women, and what are these things? Because you know, this designer (god or evolution or otherwise), for some reason, gave women brains AND uteruses."
if you say so, but I disagree with that assessment. Most women are at least as stupid and ignorant as most men. You can read it on here everyday.
Okay, but then you're saying that both men and women have brains, therefore are designed to think, and both aren't doing what they're designed to do. You're not making any sense.
"I work for attroneys, and they are people who aren't interested in only popping out babies and stealing the money of their husbands and boyfriends. These women earn $145,000 as a starting salary, and believe me, they're very competent. in fact, i work for a female federal judge right now -- she has 3 clerks (2 men, one woman, this year), and a whole bunch of interns of both genders."
Most of these women are RIGHTLY unmarriable. That article last month was wrong about working women, there are not ten but FIFTEEN TO TWENTY reasons for men (and probably more) to stay far away from know-it-all bossy Alpha Women as potential mates.
But many of them are married. Both men and women. I know plently of 2-lawyer couples, 2-MBA couples, etc. The judge I work for is married to a businessman. He's a VP somewhere. People get along just fine -- you need to stop imputing your personal very twisted and abnormanl experiences and views to "all men" and "all women."
As I stated before, I was raised in Connecticut, steeped in deep man hating feminist rhetoric in the birthplace of mounthy feminist propaganda and surrounded by educated mouthy women who could care less how their decisions affect the men around them.
It's "couldn't care less." I know, i know, mouthy educated feminists telling you you're a moron. But make no mistake, brighstar, you don't represent all men, and i don't represent all women, so when I call you, personally, a deluded idiot, it's just you. I don't hate all men, and I don't love all women.
My brother's mother in law is a case in point- she is now unmarriageable and biting her lip nervously trying to find a sugar daddy despite her having a rich and varied education that could make her tons of money, but WOMEN ARE LAZY.
Where's the logical conncetion between her being lazy and "unmarriageable? And for someone who went to college, you really don't seem to have an understanding of the difference between 1 person, and many. How can you base your opinions of women, or a particular characteristic of women, on all women? Even if your relative IS lazy, does that mean all women are lazy?
As a young man, my mind was quite more open than most (95%+) men's and then I looked around and slowly began seeing the REALITY that feminism is bilge (this is how most men seem to experience their reversion from feminism, by actually noticing what is happening around them).
Most men i know may not call themselves feminists, thanks to people like you who have made it a dirty word, but they support all sorts of "feminist ideas" and don't "revert" from it. Honestly, you're unique.
I do not think it is pathetic to participate in tearing down modern day Malevolent Feminism, I think it is heroic and necessary, particularly because men have been specifically targeted by feminists for destruction (again, it is not what they say, but what they DO that is malevolent to men and society).
I think it's pathetic to blame all your problems and personal failures on feminism.
you feminist women have ... proven to be lying, hateful frauds with a bankrupt, self serving pseudo-philosophy.
LOL. If i were stupid like you, and I based my opinions of a whole gender on one person, i would think that all men are pathetic, hateful, whiny, bitter, socially maladjusted losers. But i know better.
PS Did you miss that part when I wrote that many men can and do grow up into thoughtful mature interesting people? Why is that hateful? Here it is:
http://letters.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/09/18/randolph_macon/permalink/627d2446a3e595921b434307af5e332f.html
-
I mean, really, brightstar, are you retarded?
[Read the article: Get out the single-woman vote]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]my post had nothing to do with the substantive issue of how women vote, single or married. my post had to do with the NYT thinking it's appropriate to write, in an article about how single women vote more to the left and are more angry about certain issues, that single women have "sassy single attitude." WTF is that?! Is that worthy of the paper of record? "Sassy"? So, a woman who wants to vote, is informed, and outraged is "sassy"? That's bullshit. A man who is informed, outraged, and voting isn't called "sassy" or anything else liek that -- he's taken seriously. Not being called diminuitive names.
God damn boy! You need to learn to read.