You obviously have no idea what defamation means or is. Here's some free advice: cut your losses, stop trying to threaten people who made you look stupid.

Look, walter, do you have some sort of persecution complex? Go look up the definition of stalking, and defamation, and see how silly and paranoid you look. :) Geez.

AKA Smith said that the System's tactics appeal to a paranoid person -- well, I think we have some persuasive evidence as to that fact.

Perhaps I should have you arrested.

Your defamation and stalking are documented.

There is no delete button. And you've implicated yourself.

Arrested? For what? Stalking? Is this what the System teaches you to do? Posting on one continuous thread, making one sarcastic come-on, all within the space of a few hours is hardly stalking, get over yourself.

At least brightstar never ran to hide behind anyone's skirt. More props to him.

And defamation? How on earth did I defame you? Do you even know what defamation is?!

Oh dude, this doc love stuff is great. Wow. Just wow.

Other key ideas in "The System" include a list of Male Traits and Female Traits that are necessary for romantic love to exist. The Male Traits are Confidence (subdivided into Self-Confidence and Self-Esteem), Control (subdivided into Discipline, Patience, and Self-Control), and Challenge. The Female Traits are Integrity (subdivided into Honesty, Loyalty, and Trust), Giving Nature, Flexibility, and a lack of emotional baggage from prior relationships.

I don't sue how this:

You should know that walter is a certified True Believer in Doc Love's The System using specific pick up techniques for catching women.

is not compatible with "happy long-term relationships rather than to seduce women for one-night stands."

You can catch women to have long-term relationships with them, I think. Where's the problem?!

I gotta ask, walter map, has the system worked for you to help you have a happy long-term relationship with a woman?

I just you just do it.

???

How to report a vicious female stalker? I dunno, I imagine you email Joan Walsh. Tell her LeCastor has been challenging your arguments on a thread in Broadsheet. Good luck. :)

But I daresay running to tattle-tale to the teacher is not what a "real man" would do.

Don't worry about me, my reputation precedes me.

Care to address the logical inconsistency of what you've been saying, "withhold sex until she straighens out" vs "if he's a real man, you'll never see him again"? Which one of these is your suggested method of action? Are you not a real man, since you say you will withhold only temporarily?

The more you make insults instead of arguments, the worse you make yourself look.

No one's lying here, but you, darlin.

You wrote: "The Reality Factor says that happily married women who are flexible givers, with high Interest Levels, never seem to get headaches or feel tired. How astonishing! In fact, these women chase their husbands around the coffee table after the kids go to sleep. She doesn't need any aphrodisiacs because he is respectful, affectionate and romantic."

And you also wrote: "I ain't chasin' 'em no more. She can chase me around the coffee table if she wants. Maybe I'll let her catch me. If I don't have a headache. Maybe I'll just withhold sex until she straightens out. Maybe."

Seems to me like this is talking about withholding sex within the context of a relationship, and, "until she straightens out." Doesn't seem to gel with your shifted goalpost of "A real man can pick up his hat, smile sweetly, politely say goodnight, and find himself a woman who isn't a man-hating shrew" and "If he's a real man, you're never seeing him again."

Get your story straight, my dear.

You had your chance and you blew it.

Are you withholding sex from me already?

Oh please, walter map, go on a date with me! i'm so desperate, i pick on guys on anonymous forums on the internet, and brightstar has already rejected me so many times! and i'm not even an American woman, you'd think he'd be into that!

I'll even not bother you with my cat photos! PLEASE!!! YOU'RE THE MAN OF MY DREAMS, you stud you!

Ah, so you've abandoned any repost to the whole "withholding sex" question?

Don't you worry your pretty little head about my personal life, stick to the issues at hand. Your resort to ad hominems makes my unstable, hysterical female self look positively placid.

The CIA funded Gloria Steinem... why? To destabilize society? Why would they do that? And why would they have been working against other destabilizers, like MLK? And how does this explain Betty Friedan, and other non-funded feminists? And how does it explain non-US feminism, and feminism that preceded the women's movement in the US, like the suffragettes, and Simone de Beauvoir and Mary Shelley and John Stuart Mill? Or maybe they were also all funded by the CIA?

I'm so confused, but it's probably because i'm a dumb broad or something.

I'm not even sure what you're saying anymore. "You can't lie to me. And that's what's got you bugged." I lied to you? What about? Are you imagining things? Or maybe you think I'm looking for a date? :)

Men have plenty of leverage, babe. A real man can pick up his hat, smile sweetly, politely say goodnight, and find himself a woman who isn't a man-hating shrew.

Well, I guess we're talking about different things. Breaking up with someone, or rejecting them isn't what i meant by "withholding sex." I was talking about it within the context of a relationship, the way many women are able to, to try to get something that they want out of their partner. Like "sex for house chores," like that. In that case, IMHO, those who withhold sex are those who have no other leverage.

Oh and don't worry, I'm such a man-hating, obese, lonely, ugly, hairy, birkenstock-wearing shrew, you have no idea!