Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

anuran

Published Letters: 92
Editor's Choice: 6

Monday, May 11, 2009 11:43 AM

Laurel962

Have you read Women's Work: The First 10,000 Years? It has some very interesting observations on the history of textiles and weaving and their places in society and the home economy.

Monday, June 1, 2009 01:11 AM

I'm looking forward to this...

Terrorism is terrorism, and terrorists are terrorists, right?

Will Bill O'Reilly get waterboarded?

Are they going to confiscate all the assets of Catholic charities?

What about the President of the Mormon Church? Does he get extraordinary rendition?

"Harsh interrogation" for Right to Life?

Gitmo for the "Crisis Pregnancy Centers"?

I'm really looking forward to the deafening silence from the Dick and George Fan Club on this one. Hypocrites and moral cowards every one of them.

Monday, June 1, 2009 01:15 AM
Original article: GM's "humbling" moment

Thank You, Karl

So the Capitalists at GM, Chrysler and the entire financial sector put quick personal gain first and ignored long-term health of the firms. They looted their employers while screwing the workers and ran the companies into the ground.

The internal contradictions destroyed capitalism.

Now the Unions and the People own the means of production.

Q. E. Flippin' D.

Monday, June 1, 2009 04:35 PM

Agile, You're Giving Them Too Much Credit

These people aren't just against "birth control they consider abortifacient". They are against birth control, period. They started with abortion. Then they went after IUDs as "morally questionable". Then they started saying that hormonal birth control is abortifacient. Now they're saying that contraceptive foam and gel damage sperm and cause birth defects. One of Randall Terry's most famous moments was when he spoke out against contraception because it meant "people using each other for pleasure".

Read "How the Pro-Choice Movement Saved America" for a little more insight. These people are against birth control as a concept. They are against women doing anything but having lots of children and submitting to their men. It's kirche, kinder und kuchen all the way.

Monday, June 15, 2009 07:53 PM

Brutal Honesty

We're programmed to look for exotic. Heterozygocity means a better chance of our kids surviving and making more copies of us.

So who are these exotic strangers we marry?

Black? Not so much if you're not Black. And Black women are pretty damned vicious about enforcing the separation. An ex-girlfriend of mine was pretty much disowned by her sisters for marrying a White man. And a Black man who marries a White woman might hear the end of it in the next hundred years, but probably not.

Latinos/Latinas? It's happening. The rate is going up, but the cultural barriers are still coming down.

Jews? Romany? Not enough to really make a dent. And there are strong barriers there.

Asians? Yes to a lot of things you've said. But - here's the brutally honest part - I will tell you exactly what Asian women get out of it.

They got to marry someone who isn't an Asian man.

Sorry. There's no nice way around that one. A lot of Asian men are imperious at home. The more traditional they are the worse it is. A couple Japanese friends won't marry anyone and only date White or Black men because the only model they have is their parents'. Both of them have used the term "slavery" to describe a woman's fate in a traditional marriage. They want more out of life than being a servant to their in-laws.

Certainly money and status are part of it. Insofar as marriage is an economic relationship and Whites have more of that in the US it's a concern. But on the whole Asians have done quite well, so it's not the whole story.

Being a woman in a traditional Asian household is a crapshoot, even in America. A lot of women have voted with their feet.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009 02:05 PM

You've Been Pushing This Crap For Years

Pretty much since the beginning of the Iraq Debacle Salon has been pushing "Israel is Going to Bomb Iran".

First it was "Now that the US has invaded Iraq".

Then it was "During the Summer". Several Summers.

Then it was "During the Run-up to the US Presidential Election".

Then it was "Before Bush Leaves Office."

It didn't matter who was Prime Minister. It didn't matter what was happening in Israeli politics. It didn't matter what was happening in the US, Iran or Lower Slobovia. No matter what, The Perfidious International Zionist is about to bomb Iran.

It hasn't happened. There isn't any sign of it happening. It probably isn't going to happen. But that doesn't matter to you or to the editors at Salon, does it? You have to keep telling the same old baseless discredited lies in order to get your bi-weekly ZOG Conspiracy fix. Like all good nutjob conspiracy theories failed predictions are no reason to change your conclusion. The fact that it would require the Evil Conspirators to be stupid, suicidal and act consistently against their own interests doesn't matter. The facts are irrelevant. Only the Party Line matters.

Color me....mmmm...extremely impressed at the suave grace with which you wipe the foam from your lips.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
421

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon