Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 382
Editor's Choice: 4
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/carpenter/035
For weeks, as many progressives pondered the senator's disruptive campaign, their underlying sentiment mirrored those famous words of Cromwell to the Rump Parliament: "You have been sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"
But no longer. Let her bamboozle those few she still can. Every passing day only makes Barack Obama look that much better.
I don't read your posts. Go pick on someone who cares to engage with you.
Obama's Tax Returns
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-070416obama-tax,0,445005.story
Did you miss it?
http://www.slate.com/id/2188300/
8.8% chance of winning the nomination. Steadily going down everyday with every lie. PA should set us free and put that last nail in the coffin.
http://www.slate.com/id/2188300/
8.8% chance of winning the nomination, going down, going down, and PA will seal the coffin
Clinton: I Started Criticizing Iraq War Before Obama
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/04/05/politics/fromtheroad/entry3996192.shtml
She is so compulsive she cannot stop lying.
I completely agree with you that we should be discussing class and race. But Salon has tied their wagon to the failing campaign of hillary and don't know if they can save face after the silly attacks on Obama. Joan Walsh has been a complete disappointment.
Clinton: I Started Criticizing Iraq War Before Obama
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/04/05/politics/fromtheroad/entry3996192.shtml
She is so compulsive she cannot stop lying
You know how ballistic Joan went with the "typical white woman" no brainer. The along came Sniper gate and tax gate and false hospital story gate and NAFTA gate. Joan is characteristically quiet on all that.
I hope that after Obama wins the nomination that Joan will have the good sense to step away from her editorializing the GE. She will have to eat a lot of crow and will not be able to do Obama the Democrat any justice as he runs against McCain
Now that you have been baptized by nonsensical blather, here is what many of us have taken an oath to do. Ignore, ignore, ignore. You can do that and not fall for the bait. She is a compulsive control freak (is that sexist?)trying to pass for an intellectual. You can do it. Blessings
On the Heels of the Tuzla Whopper, Clinton is Exposed for Repeatedly Telling An Anecdote Relating to Healthcare Reform That is Allegedly Wrong on Key Points Relating to Insurance Coverage and Access. Okay, She Lied About NAFTA, She Lied About Facing Gunfire in Bosnia, And Now She Tells an Apparently Inaccurate Story to "Move" People About Healthcare Reform. This is a Person Who Achieves Results? Or Just Tells Paul Bunyan Tales?
You have my vote Tom Payne. MSM never tells us how many people we kill overseas for our national security.
It is chhabili and not Chhalibi
58,000 Americans were killed in Vietnam. Estimates of Vietnamese deaths are more than tenfold that number.
-- tom payne
Since when do we care how many of "those" we kill. Does anyone really care how many Iraqis are dead since shock and awe?
I would keep my D away from these castrating females
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4597361&page=1
Clintonon automatons take heed. Your candidate is a compulsive liar, oops misspeaker. Go easy on that Kool Aid.
Call it an "Embarrassment of Riches". Every Saturday front page features the Clinton 109 million. Right next to that is the headline about growing unemployment. It's the hard life up against the Clintons' extraordinarily good life.
The dump occurred late in the very same day that Clinton had proposed the creation of a cabinet department to combat poverty in this country. How is this for starters: What about taxing the hell out of those who make obscene amounts of money and giving the money to the poor?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=4596460
At least the Columbians have ethics about conflict of interest.
The New York Times notes that most of the Clinton's charitable contributions went to their own foundation, which has yet to give away much of the money:
During that time, the Clintons paid $33.8 million in federal taxes and claimed deductions for $10.2 million in charitable contributions. The contributions went to a family foundation run by the Clintons that has given away only about half of the money they put into it, and most of that was last year, after Mrs. Clinton declared her candidacy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/05/clintons-charitable-contr_n_95216.html
Read the entire article
I am heeding MaddieP's advice. Best no to engage Clinton trolls because they just won't listen to anything but bash Obama and look the other way as hillary continues with her bag of lies, lies and more lies
AKA is an attention getter and will feed on hate as long as she can control the conversation. So be strong and let her ramble on and on. She will go away once she realizes that people are past reading her diatribes. Just a suggestion.
I fell for her bait when she identified me on the header.
Sceeching is sexist language? Sorry, I insulted rats. I really cannot differentiate the sceeching between male and female rats.
I am only answering because I saw my name on your aaaargh post.
I promised MaddieP that I would not engage with out-of-touch Clintonon automaton trolls like you.
Besides, who died and made you monitor? Keep screeching AKA. Although I don't see you talk about Rezko much these days.