Letters to the Editor
chhabili
Published Letters: 382 Editor's Choice: 4
-
hunthorse
[Read the article: Lee Hamilton is backing Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Folks, pray for our country beause the socialists and Jehadists are preying upon it.
-- hunthorse
You got it all wrong. Jihadists, Crusaders, et al, are actually quite conservative, much like Bush and his loyalist bigots. By definition, they cannot be socialists. So whichever way you want to characterize Obama, he should really be good for you, because he just might be a jihadist wearing socialist clothing.
-
Absolutely
[Read the article: Lee Hamilton is backing Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Now I really want Sen. Clinton to stay in the race. Every day she continue to fight, Obama gains another super delegate.
-- blacktop
It must be torture for Clinton to get the waterboarding treatment from the superdelegates. Won't be long before Hillary gets run out of the campaign by the rules she agreed on at the start of the campaign.
-
You think Sen. Clinton is the Republican's go-to-gal?
[Read the article: Lee Hamilton is backing Obama]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]- Hillary and her kneecapping husband repeatedly praise McCain over Obama
- Hillary endorsed and voted for Bush to illegally invade Iraq
- Hillary is beholden to the Israeli lobby for securing her a seat in the Senate when she was not even a NY resident
- Hillary voted against the ban on cluster bombs and land mines that kill innocent civilians
- Hillary could not pass her faux Universal health care while the Clintons enjoyed majority control of the House and the Senate
- Hillary demands loyalty, which is actually a fascist requirement to dumb down dissent
Yuo. Hillary is a Republican go-to-gal.
-
AKASmith
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Honesty
In light of Hillary's misadventures in Bosnia and the hail of bullets that greeted her at the tarmac, do you hold her to the same level of honesty that you demand of Obama?
Just asking.
-
AKASmith
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]When you are adult enough to admit that Hillary lied about her Bosnia exaggeration. Obama is a politician. That's why he is running for President. I am not a fan or a follower of Obama. That is your easy way to trash supporters of a politician who is kicking your politician's rump for assuming she was queen-in-waiting for the throne in the White House. All politicians lie to some degree, but Hillary was stupid enough to believe that the nation would take her on her word in Bosnia. Busted!!!!!
-
Wyoming Governor Endorses Obama
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvzT8keHzVS3YjP8BJDDrf64A_AwD8VPQV801
-
Christopher Hitchens
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Christopher Hitchens discussed Hillary Clinton's Bosnia lie yesterday on Fox News' "Studio B with Shepard Smith" and at the end of the segment he went off on an anti-Clinton tirade.
"I wish you and your fellow people at the network would never refer to [Hillary's] husband without saying, 'the disbarred lawyer,'" Hitchens said to Smith. "Disbarred for lying under oath. The disbarred, perjured, impeached Mr. Clinton. Why is this never said? This is the man who was her moral tutor, the man who taught her how to lie, who is her main political adviser."
I don't think anyone can teach another how to lie. Bill and Hill came together because they have something in common, and that is an overwhelming and killer lust for power. That lying is second nature to the Clintons, is widely known and may I say, overlooked. But the chickens have come home to roost and won't you know that someone like Hitchens and all the mainstream media that the Klintons flagrantly pillory, are now suddenly more plausible than ever before.
-
AKASmith
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]ou simply cannot admit that Obama is dishonest in this ad. I acknowledged elsewhere that Hillary lied about her Bosnia trip. That was last week. This is this week. You are proving exactly what I am saying by continuing to discuss Hillary rather than dealing with the subject at hand.
Thanks AKASmith. I did not know that you had acknowledged that Hillary had lied. I sincerely applaud you for that.
If Obama knew that he was indeed getting money from oil companies, then of course he is being dishonest. But if he got money from individuals who work for oil companies, that is another matter. I myself work for a huge corporation and have sent money to Obama, and I have to identify my employer, every time I send him money. But that does not mean that my company supports Obama.
In any case, I was wrong to jump to conclusions based on your previous posts.
-
dennisdean
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Rupert Murdoch gave Bill millions of $s and even got cosy with hillary. So his daughter supports Obama. Don't they sorta cancel each other out? Where's the beef?
-
AKASmith
[Read the article: FactCheck.org: Obama statement "a little too slick"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]I think she would be a safe and competent choice. Would she be a great president?
How would she make even a competent president? She had a huge lead over all her opponents prior to the primaries. She had a huge advantage of having over $140 million before the primaries started. She not only squandered her lead but she also ran the money like water through her sticky fingers.
As for her management style, her campaign staff have squabbled so much that the NY Times had to write several cautionary tales about the internal machinations of the Clinton plan to tie up the nomination within a couple of months. Hell, she cannot even control her own husband let alone her mouthy surrogates.
Clinton was and has been hoisted by her own petard. She made several assumptions. The public was not going to scrutinize her husband's years in office and her credentials in particular. She assumed that the Democratic party would blindly rubber stamp her into being the nominee without being "vetted."
So all in all, she is incompetent in
- Financial Management
- Staffing her campaign
- Reining in her trigger happy husband
- Padding her resume
- Failing all of the above, resorting to attack ads and dirty politics.
So where is her competence?