Letters to the Editor
Published Letters: 1
-
Electronic machines can be corrupted
[Read the article: Multistate analysis: Democrats poised to take the House in November]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]No matter what local polls show, or what analysts say about the 2006 election, the election results, even in a small but important district that uses electronic voting machines, can be switched by an undetectable worm or virus in that system. And since that system does not provide verifiable paper ballots to augment the election results by a verifiable record, no one can ever detect flaws or verify how the voters actually voted.
A perfect system for those who want to tilt the voting results to their advantage. And since most of the election results that were in contrast to the Exit Polls benefited Republicans, one can only conclude that the manufacturers of the electronic/paperless voting machines, like Diebold, who gave huge campaign donations to the Republicans, were implicit in swaying/corrupting the vote COUNT so that Republicans would win.
That's not a conspiracy theory. That is FACT.
We know Bush didn't win in 2000, since Gore got half a million more popular votes than Bush, and the Repblican appointed majority in the Supreme Court ruled in opposition to all their decisions in favor of state's rights, and overuled the Florida Supreme Court to stop the vote recount in Florida, in order to appoint Bush to the Presidency.
The 2004 election was decided by the fraud of G Bush's corporate budies and huge contributors, who blatently produced no paper trail electonic voting machines, and also the machines that would count those votes.
Was it Stalin who said that it doesn't matter who casts the votes, but it's the matter of those who COUNT them, who will determine who is elected?