Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Brightstar 2 - The Resurrection

Published Letters: 1894
Editor's Choice: 1

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 10:38 AM

Why is all this so willfully cryptic?

First, I will say, I do not know the answer

(why can the girls' action cause so much anger? what's the rationale? the mechanism?),

But why is this reaction and mechanism seemingly cryptic to so many people?

The contrast is this western style female behavior: Women who CHOOSE TO rut with who they please, when they please, consequences be damned (YES, you women select not for "good" men, but for fuckable men-- BIG difference, fuckable men go fuck the next woman on their list tomorrow night), even if all your sisters are doing the same thing and destroying the culture around them into a hovel of trailer trash, fatherless childrearing.

vs, traditional unbringing: Women and men work together to withold some level of decency, EVEN AT THE EXPENSE OF WOMEN being able to do as they please. The men do not typically fuck around, understanding their role as the head of the household, and the women support the men in what is a difficult role.

It is true that in Pakistani culture, the women will line up to congratulate these men who did this atrocious thing.

They understand that the alternative is a dying, collapsing society, such as America and western Europe.

It has been such since time immemorial.

Is there a better answer than killing transgressors? Maybe abandonment to the woods? Let the tribe down the river deal with them?

Does this let men off the hook? Only to the extent that the men are NOT upholding this agreed upon community vigilance effort. (men fucking wantonly may be considered a bad thing or it may be brushed aside-- I do not know the specifics of the Pakistani culture)

Me repeat: the women in the tribe support this sort of behavior. You feminists, go ask these WOMEN why this is? They will tell you the SAME answer I did, give or take.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 10:41 AM

Freudianism of a sort?

you decide.

I meant to say not

vs, traditional unbringing: Women and men work together to withold some level of decency,

but

vs, traditional uPbringing: Women and men work together to UPhold some level of decency,

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 01:43 PM

I'm glad

that you've posted an informative counterargument that calmly lists your points of contention.

And it is nice that you did not resort to vile ad hominem attacks on me just because you disagreed with me.

Let er rip, fellas!

Brightstar you are so f__ing reprehensible

Yep, you are truly, truly vile. Your lonliness and rejection are not the result of a lack of "fuckability". You are alone because you are a horrible misogynist, and that is simply not attractive. You reek of gross, unibomber weirdness, and I only hope that when your rage ignites, it turns inwards rather than on those around you.

ooh, kitty has claws. hee hee ;-}

I am not alone, but thanks for asking.

I merely stated the obvious, that lots of societies still hold a medieval view of men and women and their roles in society. Why would you want to rip ME for this?

Do you hope to shame everyone you disagree with into shutting up so you can then go on with whoring to your heart's content?

FYI, as another Broadsheet posting described, the vast majority of men are not sex obsessed boobs, but are into being honored and respected by their peers. They are into having a healthy emotional relationship with their women.

This squares with my personal experience and the experience of most of the men I know.

BUT it is at odds with the feminist contention that all men ONLY want to fuck incessantly on endless one night stands. Of course the feminists think this about all men because they THEMSELVES want to be able to engage in such behavior.

I will tell you what I said on another board the other day.

As long as women are the gatekeepers, they will continue to be criticized for who they let through that gate. This is biology and cannot be changed. The only exception is when a woman gets raped, in which case she did not offer her permission to the rapist.

This REALITY is multiplied by the mere fact that loose women who create lots of unaccounted for litters of kids act to destroy society from within. Remember: WOMEN, not men, are the gatekeepers.

Once this wisdom permeates your membrane, you will understand this (around the time the sun is another 5 billion years older, but I'm willing to wait).

You can swear at the messenger (me) all you want. But really, don't waste your breath on me. You will not change my opinion with vinegar.

Most Active Letters Threads

738

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
350

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
208

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon