Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Brightstar 2 - The Resurrection

Published Letters: 1894
Editor's Choice: 1

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:58 AM

I don't get it Asehpe

you claim nobody on here is a radical feminist.

But of course, many people on here believe only mothers should have a say in abortion, not even implementing into law the acceptance of the critical input of the father.

I would call such organized societal hatred toward men a radical feminist notion. Yet most people on here consider it just the norm.

It is only one example of many such things.

So then, your leftist saturated definition of 'radical' is what we NORMALS must work around.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:41 AM

It is this stewing of your mind in feministic rhetoric that thwarts you

it's merely a direct consequence of the idea that people have the right to decide what they want and don't want to do with their bodies. Nobody can force me to donate a kidney if I don't want to. Nobody can force me to exercise my muscles if I don't want to. And nobody can force a woman to use her womb if she doesn't want to.

Really, was this an excuse to use when men were conscripted to fight in past wars? Why should ANYONE force a young man to do what he does not want to do with his body?

How about when it comes to a man who did not want to be a father and there was an 'accident'? Who can force him to use his body to earn money to give to the mother of the child he did not want? The courts can.

And here is where we differ. Men are NOT 3/5ths of women.

You do not even see past the fem rhetoric you are so deep in it.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:51 AM

And frankly

if men are somehow DISADVANTAGED in contrast to women, by not having a womb for instance, A FAIR AND EQUITABLE SOCIETY would work to COMPENSATE men for this shortcoming of theirs.

But as long as radical man hating feminists prevail and control the dialog, this will not occur.

Which is why it is critical to collapse the regime as it stands NOW in order to bring about true EQUALITY between men and women.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:52 AM

so yeah,

I hope you, Asehpe, can help support us men into bringing this reality into being.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:59 AM

This is not possibility

That's why more than one RW'er is theorizing that the economy imploding is all a plot on the part of socialists. Paul Krugman links to a funny post at CrookedTimber that looks at this "possibility".

This is not possibility, it is stated FACT. The PNAC and elite groups such as the Bilderbergers have long PUBLICLY professed a desire to economically collapse the United States, bringing in a crisis, in order to force it into the New World Order framework.

That most people's egos do not allow them to pursue this knowledge by doing something as simple as looking at the literature does not mean that this is not the reality. Indeed, the elites COUNT on the sheeple continuing to ignore the reality of what the elites are pursuing.

They laugh at us all, the 'marks' that we are, at their brie and Chateau De Rothschild drenched cocktail parties.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 02:32 PM

Until there is a medical solution

if men are somehow DISADVANTAGED in contrast to women, by not having a womb for instance, A FAIR AND EQUITABLE SOCIETY would work to COMPENSATE men for this shortcoming of theirs.

I'm sure science is working on that, but it's harder to build an artificial womb than it is to artifically inseminate a woman. And this is not the fault of society; it's just that wombs are more complicated. But all in all, I'm sure science is working on that, and at some point men will also be able to have children by themselves.

Until there is a medical solution, artificial wombs, women need to acknowledge that they OWE men a political or social solution to level the field for men.

That women do not feel obligated to do such a thing is PRECISELY the reason it is perfectly logical to say MAN HATING in the context of feminism, because feminism at core is against this concept of compensating men politically or socially for this very valid shortcoming men have.

Now, since you apparently think men are LESS than 3/5ths of a person compared to women, I can completely understand why you would think the current regime is just fine and dandy.

This is why men have low esteem. WOMEN do this to men.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 02:33 PM

But of course

women love to play the victim card because it throws men, like you, off the scent of the REAL problem, which is this treatment of men as mere FRACTIONAL humans.

Thursday, October 23, 2008 09:15 AM
Original article: Putting out for Barack

Refreshingly honest!

I wish "Boys say no to girls who diss Palin" held more force though.

Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:25 AM
Original article: Putting out for Barack

A question to help out the ladies

It's so tiresome & boring, to blow a load in a chick, you have to do something deemed worthy & then have to continue to make payments to maybe get a chance to do it again. Prostitutes are a wonderful thing...a single transaction cost.

Is there another way? I mean, is there ALWAYS a transaction involved with the man giving something to the woman?

Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:43 AM
Original article: Rrrowr!

So being pro-abortion is a problem

and being anti-abortion is a problem.

but this gets better.

being pro-choice is not a problem...as long as only ONE SEX gets to decide the choice.

the other sex is irrelevant.

and just HOW is this equality?

Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:44 AM

oh my.

I hope he does not get hurt in the landslide

Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:46 AM

Don't trust the polls, people

lots of racists out there telling the pollsters what the pollsters want to hear.

c'mon people, go vote our commie president into office, so we can get this country finished off once and for all.

and don't listen to those who say Ron Paul was correct after all.

Thursday, October 23, 2008 01:36 PM
Original article: Putting out for Barack

umm

As a political tactic, it's certainly offensive to our ideas of who we are as a society, but not nearly as offensive as the boys' version of power, i.e., just kill and maim anyone who doesn't agree with us.

So WHY are feminists STILL alive?

Thursday, October 23, 2008 01:38 PM
Original article: Putting out for Barack

"Girls say YES

to *HOT* boys who say Obama."

Now THAT'S more accurate.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
200

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience
186

A new report questions "suicides" at Guantanamo

Why is the Obama DOJ attempting to block judicial review of three highly suspicious deaths?
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon