In a just world, they would rot out of existence.

Instead of taking on the competition head on and hiring top engineers and designers, for decades, these companies have produced deplorable junk, considering Americans not deserving enough to own dependable, lasting vehicles.

For decades, these same companies continued to lobby Washington so they do not have to produce fuel efficient vehicles. Now their bad decisions place them in more jeopardy.

They hung themselves.

Really, the CEOs and other decision makers of these neanderthal behemoths ought to be jailed or fined into bankruptcy for being a threat and a menace to American society.

Wow, the amount of venom toward American cars, built by your fellow Democrats, is really an eye-opener!

But it should not be completely surprising in a sub-culture that so thoroughly hates everything else about America and is mostly consumed with guilt over the United States' status as the freest, richest, best place to live in the world.

Just WHO HATES AMERICA???

Maybe your finger ought to be pointed at the unaccountable internatioanlist CEOs running these rattrap makers.

America may have once been the richest, freest nation, but after the Bush disaster, this is no longer true. Unless you are a billionaire, of course.

As a TRUE American, I have a PATRIOTIC RESPONSIBILITY to make sure our nation is the best it can be- despite your Bush's deep despicable hatred of this once great nation.

Handing out money to unaccountable internationalist corporations, having them ROB our treasury, so they can pocket it and continue to run failing companies is EXACTLY the wrong approach.

That you would defend them leads me to believe you are either a clown or a paid troll.

Dear Beth and Tina...

The point you're missing is that Sarah Palin herself is anti-feminist. So, electing her would be worse than electing the most sexist man.

I would argue that Sarah Palin, much as I dislike her, is MORE of a feminist than you self-styled leftist pseudo-feminists.

Wasn't feminism about equal opportunity? Wasn't it about women taking on men and making lives for themselves? Wasn't it about women being independent and thinking for themselves?

So explain to me how it is that you can imagine Sarah Palin to be weak on feminism?

Just because she has an issue with you women killing your flesh and blood in the womb? (for the record, I do believe abortion is murder, but ONLY after the halfway point or so)

Just because she is not standing there with her hands out, waiting for the courts to hand her some gimme at the expense of the men around her?

Just because she is not whining and begging that life is just SOOOO unfair because she actually has to get out there and hustle?

Just because she is not pointing firngers and laying blame for all the world's woes on the men around her?

She does not do any of these things, but I sure as hell know a lot of supposed "feminists" (whiny little babies, really) who DO act and think this way. [just look at the Salon boards for examples]

Hell, much as I disagree with Palin's politics, you can give me a WHOLE SOCIETY FULL of women like her, who are strong and stand up for themselves, who take half the blame and responsibility for how society is run, who are confident enough to take on all comers. Now, I may be inculcating Palin with behavior she may not actually be engaging in. For all I know, she bitches and moans about men and about how she needs men to hand her things too. But if one looks at trends and tendencies, I would vouch that a Palinesque woman would outshine a typical simpering man-hating self-styled Berkeley proto-lesbian anyway, anyday, in most men's minds- (at least in those men not firmly embedded in their girlfriend's vaginas 24/7/365, like a blood leech, and hoping she doesn't finally kick him out).

You women really just do not get it, do you??? Men want REAL, strong women. Women we would WANT to defend and protect.

We men most definitely do NOT want simpering, excuse mongering, cynical deviants as most of you leftie so-called feminists seem to be.

As a centrist libertarian who will vote Ron Paul in November, I am secretly almost HOPING McSame wins in November just to stick it to you man-hating manipulative "Faludian" lefties.

I may not care for Palin and her dipsy-do cutesy-poo look, and her politics may not interest me, as I am not into fascism, but she sure seems mighty preferable to what the left has on offer these days with its 'gimme, gimme, the presidency because I deserve it. because you people OWE IT TO ME' mewly Clintonites.

Are they trying to make Hell more attractive?

That's quite a sales pitch for Satan's lair.

I've never understood why religions refuse to describe in detail all the sexual, sensual, glorious wonders of Heaven to their sheeple.

Is there no such fun up there?

If not, well then WHY NOT?

What is the definition of heaven and of hell and is it aligned wrong?

I THOUGHT God liked that we like sex and that we can create more copies of Him.

"I kissed a boy,

My preacher made me do it,

Oh wait! I AM the preacher!

Hallelujit!!"

you like?