Letters to the Editor
Published Letters: 1824
-
Like clockwork
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]3... 2... 1... "but Clinton! Clinton did it!!! CLINTON'S PENIS!!!!! <*WAUUUUGGGHHH--OOOOMMPPHHGG!!!*>"
Hilarious. Even if in the 37th rerun.
FWIW, I did get a chuckle out of that tubby twit in the Blumenthal video: "Definitely Not Gay!"....
Cheers,
-
@ PhilSheehan
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]See, those are the places I've been. That's why I feel qualified to observe that a lot of you come off as the other side of the hypcritical GOP coin: a bunch of inexperienced and unthinking post-adolescents who treat the job of living and maintaining a democracy as if it were just an extension of fifth-graded giggly politics.
Well then why don't you restrict your criticism to those you can demonstrate are such "all-juvenile-talk-but-no-walk" people, then. You assume a lot about the people here, but many may surprise you in your assumptions ... as to age, experience, views, and what may really suprise you: Even politics.
IOW, why don't you take on specifics which you can show to be the case?
Cheers,
-
Shooter makes sh*te up....
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Perhaps you've forgotten that Muslims in Toronto wanted to bypass Canadian law and impose Sharia on the Muslim population?
That's a gross misrepresentation of the situation. Not to mention, nothing like that ever went through.
Say, JOOC, what about this crapola down here in the lower 50 about implementing "Cris'shun law" as to what a marriage ought to constitute? What ever happened to that effort by those religious zealots?
Cheers,
-
Shooter hits his own foot....
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]More recently, the Senate is trying to pull out a provision giving people that report suspicious acts or items legal immunity. If that happens the flying Imam's will have succeeded.
That would be a tragedy. Then we couldn't file with impunity baseless accusations against Shooter for his terra-ist activites and watch him spend many years and tons of bucks in legal fees trying to prove his innocence.....
Cheers,
-
The Reader's Digest biography of noted troll "shooter242"
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Written by PartyofDog:
"That's what has these little ones peeing their beds. The fact that someone has the means and will to randomly kill people in their own country (what they advocate America do to others) without regard to class or status scares the BeJesus outa them. We heard no outrage and demand from these twits to attack random small countries when the Cole was bombed or the military high rise in Saudi Arabia was bombed, in the 90s'--after all they were military--there was no chance they or their family members would be harmed.
"But when the bombs hit home the hens get hysterical, and call for immoral, illegal, and outrageous behavior in a desperate attempt to relieve their fear. Pathetic aren't they?"
Now #1 on Oprah's "must read" list for those that want to know how we got to where we are.
"shooter242" was just browning his pants a couple threads ago...
Cheers,
-
@ Gordon
[Read the article: The Weekly Standard's "9/11 Generation"]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Go ahead. Call me a pussy.
It's a compliment, invoking a magnificent anatomical part from which springs life, in which there is pleasure, mystery.And it's a lovely sounding word!
Call me a dick. It's funny. I like funny. Funny is good. Dick is a compliment too.
I feel honoured then. "shooter" calls me a dick every chance he gets. Maybe I should tell him that my fiancee agrees enthusiastically. ;-)
Cheers,
-
Maybe a silver lining?
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here][Glenn, quoting Col. Boylan]:
Dear Mr. Greenwald,
Rest assured that you are on the list that we work on a continual basis. If you find that you will be here in Iraq, please let me know as most of the interviews that Gen Petraeus prefers to do are here in Iraq face-to-face and mostly on battlefield circulations.
So was Hewitt's fat a$$ over there in Iraq?!?!? Next time, send him over ... sans heavily armed platoon to protect him and Kevlar vest.
Cheers,
-
Typo
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here][Glenn, from the post]: There is nothing in the Bush administration that is not politicized from top to bottom.
That should have been in bold 144 pt. type. This is the fact (as demonstrated on a daily basis by the likes of ThinkProgress, Josh Marshall at TalkingPointsMemo, as well as Glenn here and many others) that needs to be made clear to the American public. They're only in it for the power (and the money). Everything else be damned with this maladministration.
Cheers,
-
Sleeping With The Enemy
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here][Glenn]: Now they're sending me via email unsolicited forms to embed in Iraq, along with emails that say things like "Thank yuo for inquiring about covering Operation Iraqi Freedom . . . Aattached is a file 'Media Embed Application.'" I suppose they think there is some point to be made if I don't run over and turn myself over to the U.S. military to guide me around Iraq even though, as you say, Hugh Hewitt didn't.
Why should you get "in bed" with them?!?!? Wasn't that half the farkin' problem to begin with (see, e.g., Judy "Effin'" Miller....)?
CHeers,
-
Some stoopid dolt wrote:
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Who in the world is going to willingly sit for an interview with someone that is already combative in the request?
Ummm, someone that isn't afraid of any questions he might be asked?
Cheers,
-
"... and rise above the race issues that color Bonds in the public eye."
[Read the article: When Barry passes Hank]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Wow. Better read up on my history. I though Aaron was black....
Cheers,
-
@ Rufus X
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]The Beeb paraphrasing Petraeus: But he warned that US forces were engaged in a "tough fight" which will get "harder before it gets easier".
Attacks and deaths up? Why, they're getting desperate, so we must be winning.... Attacks and deaths down? See, the situation is stabilising so we must be winning....
How can you lose?
Where have I heard that before (outside of Dubya's stoopid mumblings)?
Oh, yeah, right. Sandbox. Third grade. "Heads I win, tails you lose." Don't think it fooled me then....
Cheers,
-
@ Titus Pullo
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Hey, I think I've get this Glenn Greenwald thing down pat! Where's my check?
No. You've got that "stoopid troll" thing down pat. Write the RNC for your check (but don't be surprised if the postage exceeds the payoff).
Cheers,
-
Troll Titus Pullo isn't earning his RNC pay
[Read the article: Further politicization of the U.S. military's public statements]
[Read more letters about this article: Here]Why shouldn't you have to go through the same process as everyone else?
Like Hugh Hewitt did ... not(!)? Say, did you read the article before you opened your ignerrent trap?
Cheers,