Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

emmavroege

Published Letters: 7

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 02:57 PM

Prostitution and factory work

Not the same thing.

Prostitution is not just another "unpleasant job" people do "in order to support themselves, rather than because they enjoy it".

If you're an unemployed Nevadan and go to an employment agency, how come the person behind the counter might suggest a career in fast food, but will never say: "I've got a great job offer for you here: how about becoming a prostitute in the local brothel?"

For all those people who think prostitution is just a normal job that simply isn't as enjoyable as being, say, a lawyer: What if you had a daughter (and prostitution were legal); if she were asking for career advice -- she was doubting between a career in fast food and a career in the escort business, which would you recommend? Exactly.

The truth is, prostitution is very problematic. Many women are being exploited or abused, or have other issues. Legalization doesn't solve anything. They legalized it in 2001 in the Netherlands, and the problem (with sex slaves) only became bigger, so they are now thinking about criminalizing it again (pimping, that is, not prostitution).

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 03:42 PM

Wake up: Legalization does not solve anything

They legalized it in the Netherlands. It did not lead to any improvement. Quite the contrary; many pre-existing problems worsened.

Everyone should read 10 Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution, which is larded with illustrations from the Netherlands.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 03:44 PM

10 Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution

Sorry, forgot the link:

http://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/issues/prostitution_legalizing.html

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:08 AM

Mark Penn...

is that you?

Monday, April 7, 2008 11:22 AM

emhy18 nails it...

http://letters.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/04/07/hillary/permalink/42ef100aa4cf15afe7647a2a2818a5c2.html

Exactly right.

"If the rules had been different, Hillary would have won" does not take into account the different strategy that the Obama camp would have adopted if the rules had been different.

It's very poor reasoning on Sean Wilentz' part -- it's actually more mindless regurgitating of the Clinton camp's talking points. Rather shameful for someone who's supposed to be a top academic.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008 01:13 AM
Original article: Barack Obama's epic win

"But not since William Jennings Bryan in 1896 and Woodrow Wilson in 1912 have the Democrats nominated a candidate so new to the national stage."

Um, wat about Jimmy Carter?

Monday, November 10, 2008 10:38 AM
Original article: America center-right? Wrong

America IS a center-right nation

And the Democrats are a center-right party, perfectly mainstream. (The Republicans are an extreme-right party.)

Most Active Letters Threads

405

I'm thankful I'm not President Obama

Backers deride Katrina-style negligence, haters hate him more each day. Can this presidency be saved? Of course
322

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
320

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
226

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon