Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

sonofloud

Published Letters: 1612
Editor's Choice: 10

Monday, April 6, 2009 04:11 PM

Just ignore the increased US military activity in Afghanistan and Pakistan

pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Monday, April 6, 2009 11:42 AM

Next time you can't make your credit card payment, just tell them

deficits are good.

Monday, April 6, 2009 11:41 AM

Tim Geithner is Corporate America

how can you fire yourself?

Saturday, April 4, 2009 06:13 PM

The bailout costs $167 billion more than originally claimed

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Bailing out the financial sector will cost taxpayers $167 billion more than originally anticipated, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate.

The original figure in January was $189 billion, but it is now $356 billion - $152 billion more for 2009 and $15 billion more next year, the CBO says in its March report updating the budget and economic outlook.

The CBO raised its projection because yields have increased on securities issued by the bailed-out financial institutions under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program.

That means there will be an increase in the cost of the subsidy from the U.S. Treasury's purchase of preferred stock, asset guarantees and loans to automakers, the CBO said.

In addition, since the CBO issued its original cost estimate for the program, the Treasury announced additional deals with Bank of America and American International Group.

Those deals will be at rates higher than the averages in the CBO's original estimate. Also going up: the subsidy rates in the administration's $50 billion program to deal with home foreclosures.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BAILOUT_COSTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Saturday, April 4, 2009 07:37 AM

If that's liberal I hate to see conservative

and yet the mainstream media continues to call Obama and congress liberal democrats.

Saturday, April 4, 2009 07:19 AM

Let's not forget the NRA's hand in all of this

WASHINGTON (AP) -- When Democrats acted last month to give the District of Columbia long-denied voting rights in Congress, the powerful gun lobby saw a target too good not to take a shot at.

The National Rifle Association's lobbyists made it clear to lawmakers that they believed the bill should include a measure to overturn the capital's gun control laws. Left mostly unsaid, but well understood by all 535 members of the House and Senate, was that failure to do so would unleash a barrage of political pain on resisters.

The result showed the strong sway the NRA has even over a Congress dominated by liberal Democrats who mostly disagree with the organization's positions. The Senate voted overwhelmingly to add the gun-rights proposal. House Democratic leaders, fearing a tough vote on the issue, swiftly scrapped plans to consider the D.C. voting legislation.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_AT_GUNPOINT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

ps concerning the article above....this congress is anything but liberal

Saturday, April 4, 2009 07:15 AM

Thanks Glenn, I've been pointing that out for weeks

kind of like the fox guarding the chicken coup, eh?

Saturday, April 4, 2009 07:13 AM
Original article: Drug-fueled madness!

It's not the secretary of state's job to create our national drug policy

it's the presidents, even though the media continues to absolve Obama of responsibility on every issue.

Friday, April 3, 2009 02:40 PM

More to think about

Eliot Spitzer wants to know if the bailout of AIG was an inside deal among Goldman Sachs, the Treasury, and the Fed. Edward Jay Epstein, who has been unraveling conspiracy theories since the Warren Commission, examines the evidence.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-04-02/inside-the-aig-conspiracy-theories/

Friday, April 3, 2009 07:03 AM

I've never heard racism blamed on atheism before lol

that's a new one!

Friday, April 3, 2009 06:34 AM

"Risk-averse" isn't that just another word for coward?

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama's Democratic allies in Congress are taking only baby steps with his budget, putting off crucial decisions on his ambitious plans to expand health care, curb global warming and raise taxes on the wealthy.

Risk-averse Democrats, however, are merely kicking the can down the road rather than using the budget to give a real push to the president's agenda. On health care, global warming and even Obama's signature "Making Work Pay" tax cut, the pending House and Senate budget plans offer no clues as to how those big ideas might advance.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUDGET_BABY_STEPS_ANALYSIS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Friday, April 3, 2009 06:30 AM

Why not?

Religion is all about denying reality.

Thursday, April 2, 2009 01:10 PM

The catholic church believes:

that a virgin human female got pregnant, that just being born makes a person automatically guilty (original sin), that any person who isn't a catholic will go to hell, etc.

Why on earth would anyone take these people seriously???

Oh yeah, Wall Street couldn't pay for all of Obama's campaign.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 12:11 PM

Speaking of endless self-pity

Israel's new ultra-nationalist foreign minister has said it is not bound by a US-sponsored 2007 agreement to reach a peace deal with the Palestinians.

"The Annapolis conference, it has no validity," Avigdor Lieberman said.

He was speaking at a handover ceremony at the foreign ministry, prompting his predecessor Tzipi Livni to interrupt and diplomats to shift uncomfortably.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7977002.stm

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 10:00 AM

This is absurd

how long are we going to allow people's personal religious choices to trump the law.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 09:59 AM

So much for the "liberal" congress

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama's Democratic allies in Congress are taking only baby steps with his budget, putting off crucial decisions on his ambitious plans to expand health care, curb global warming and raise taxes on the wealthy.

Indeed, key lawmakers are already playing "taps" over his proposals to chip away at wealthy people's ability to deduct charitable donations and mortgage interest at higher rates.

Instead, they designed a host of so-called reserve funds that give some modest procedural help to Obama initiatives but do nothing concrete to really advance them.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUDGET_BABY_STEPS_ANALYSIS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 09:55 AM

It's the same with religion

they all claim to be under attack meanwhile they campaign to take away other people's rights.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 06:57 AM

Basically it means you can't use the greenhouse effect as justification for classifying

something as a pollutant.

I thought we finally got past the people who don't think the greenhouse effect is real?

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 06:51 AM

Isn't that the "this is for your own good" philosophy

that child abusers use?

Wednesday, April 1, 2009 06:48 AM

I've loved Isabella since Blue Velvet

a truly beautiful person inside and out.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009 09:47 AM

"compared to Europe, the U.S. is taking much more aggressive action to confront the global economic mess"

since Wall Street, which is located in the United States, caused this mess isn't that appropriate?

Tuesday, March 31, 2009 07:37 AM
Original article: The schizophrenic Obama

Obama's top contributors from the 2007 to 2008 election cycle

University of California $1,392,675

Goldman Sachs $1,035,095

Harvard University $831,110

Microsoft Corp $809,799

Google Inc $796,564

JPMorgan Chase & Co $700,808

Citigroup Inc $681,318

Sidley Austin LLP $604,938

University of Chicago $599,089

Stanford University $584,904

Skadden, Arps et al $564,345

Time Warner $540,051

UBS AG $529,869

IBM Corp $525,857

WilmerHale $525,792

Morgan Stanley $513,623

Columbia University $507,316

National Amusements Inc $506,751

Kirkland & Ellis $501,335

US Government $482,956

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638

I'd say over $1 million in one year entitles Goldman Sachs to pull a string or two.

The following link is just for Goldman Sachs contributions http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000085

Most Active Letters Threads

438

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
109

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
99

I survived Glenn Beck's Christmas spectacular

The preposterous showman brings his holiday book, and waterworks, to the stage and screen. Lights! Camera! Jesus!

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon