You wish to see John McCain's medical-records of the psychiatric

variety? Well, post your records first so that we will have good

comparative records to validate against......oh, by the way, how

many POW camps have you been held captive in and how many days-

long interrogations have you been a subject of? 'Nuff said.

21%....are they really just racists? Or, do they see through the

PC statements, the rhetoric and illogical disillusion that those

in the Middle East just dislike George Bush and not Barack Obama?

Do these 21% maybe see the World Poverty Act and legislation like

HR-1022 that Obama sponsors as something that will not work and is not in the best interest of Americans? Maybe they are on to

something that the Obama folks should address and try to resolve.

What skeletons are going to pop-up and surprise us all before

November?

Hilary Clinton will not necessarily concede today or tonight

that Obama has won. She will gracefully bow out of the lime-

light for now and await the predicted "bomb-shell" that will

come later in Obama's bid for the White House. Some pundits

say it is being scripted this way to appease all of the voters

that support each candidate. Will it be Michelle Obama's racial

speech that will separate the party even more, will it be a

"religious" revelation that shows why Obama was ignorant of

the rants and movement within his church of twenty years? Who

knows? But, a competitor of this site thinks this will all come

to pass. How about you, the reader? Will all of this be cohesive

in bringing the party together or will it divide even more?

This is just a foretaste of things to come. If the Global

Poverty Act is passed and enacted, watch out. More taxes

on US citizens to pay for UN programs, projects and goals.

NOT American ones, UN ones. Kiss your profits and dividends

good-bye, along with your right to self-protection......the

Second Amendment. Adios, America as we knew it. Barack

Hussein Obama is a co-sponsor of these bills in the Senate

right now. Mainstream media will not tell you this, as

Obama is their new and politically-correct candidate. He

WILL tax away your profits and remove your rights for

the better-good. His record already proves this. Remember

it in November.

When are questions from John Q. Public going to be addressed by the Barack Hussein Obama campaign? When are subjects like his sponsorship of the Global Poverty Act going to be in the spotlight? Who is going to finance paying for "taxes" to the UN by the US-government that Mr. Obama feels we owe? Why do his voting records in Illinois paint a different picture of his stand on Second Amendment rights than his media-campaign is trying to portray? I have written to his campaign only to receive a talk-over and no yes or no response to questions of his beliefs in Constitutional law. When will he address issues that his book writings make appear to be anti-American and anti-Christian? His responses thus far have been politically-correct and were non-answers. He again talked around issues. His new web-site to stem off criticism and stop rhetoric have done nothing to answer questions on the minds of uncommitted voters. When is the media going to take the initiative and ask REAL questions and get REAL answers?

I would like to know what the author of this article is smoking. Is Mr. Kamiya truly aware of what Barack Hussein Obama stands for? A proponent of One World Government, Mr. Obama sponsored the Global Poverty Act in the Senate. He agrees to taxes on the US-citizens for the sake of paying for UN-sanctioned programs. This is a step toward One World Government. And, ask Mr. Obama where his voting record stands on constitutional ideals. He voted in the negative on most issues pertaining to personal freedoms. In his stint as a legislator in Illinois his record is anti-Second Amendment and anti-personal freedoms. It is a record that he cannot deny. So, before the GOP should concede defeat, maybe the Democrats should be forthwith on where their candidate stands on personal freedoms and world order.

Did the supposedly diverse Michelle Obama address what transpired this past Monday when her husband's volunteer-staff politely requested that Muslim women with traditional head-garb either remove them or get out of the picture for the media? It may have been volunteers that blundered, but it makes one wonder what else the campaign wishes to not have us know....hand-bump or not.

Only in America.....better blame this on the Republicans, too.

Of course Bill Clinton is going to make himself scarce. Of course his wife is going to promote Barack Hussein Obama. Afterall, he is promising to help pay off her campaign debts in trade for her public support of him in the media. Slick Willie is just being himself, Slick. Ease outta the picture while his wife gets her bills paid by someone else......Slick.

No need to slam Wesley Clark. It is his opinion of John McCain and not that of Barack Hussein Obama....who, by the way, said in his book, Audacity of Hope,"I will stand with the Muslims, should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."...Guess this does qualify him to be Commander-in-Chief. We will not need to have fired a shot.

Just read one of Barack Hussein Obama's books. It IS personal with what he has to say..."I will stand with the Muslims, should the political winds shift in an ugly direction....."from Audacity of Hope. Or, ANY of his writing within Dreams of My Father, such as, "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites." With all of the fodder available to McCain, I do believe he is being VERY polite is his attitude toward Barack Hussein Obama.