Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

zizou#5

Published Letters: 117     Editor's Choice: 1

  • Semper Fi

    [Read the article: So, are the Marines "phony soldiers," too?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    From the NYT:

    "The suggestion (by the commandant) was raised in a session last week convened by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and regional war-fighting commanders.

    On its face, it makes sense. The Corps has always been in conflict with the other branches of the armed services, especially the Army. In the Pacific War against the Japanese, the Army would come in after the Marines had taken an island, suffered the casualties, etc. That is, done all the dirty work and the Army would follow up and get all the "glory". I can't imagine what the Marines think of what's going on in Iraq but I'd wager that a large part of it is based on the historical enmity (or rivalry to put a kinder spin on it) they have against the Army. At this point I have to wonder how much it really matters.

  • "Do as I say, not as I do..."

    [Read the article: One of these things is not like the other]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    "We're at war with coldblooded killers who despise freedom, reject tolerance, and kill the innocent in pursuit of their political vision.."

    Bush who advocates "freedom"(tm) only for the wealthy; Bush who is never in danger or being perceived as tolerant-- Karla Faye Tucker anyone?; and Bush who in pursuing his political vision, has in fact been responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocents and who has metaphorically killed his opponents, say conservatively 51% of the population, in order to achieve his political vision of a Republican majority and unitary executive. Bush, who wouldn't know irony and hypocrisy if it kicked him in the balls with a steel-toed jack boot.

  • Bar, the real pants in the family

    [Read the article: Battle of the Bushes]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I recall reading a few years back about the father-son dynamic between 41 & 43. By all accounts, Poppy wasn't around much during the Boy King's childhood. Bar ran the roost with an iron fist. And the Boy King is really much more his mother's son: a viper and a harridan; witness Boy King's demeaning habit of still giving nicknames to everyone. It stands to reason this is the case. 41 shows all the signs of being hen-pecked and brow beaten. And then throw in the class dynamic. Bar is a Pierce, in some ways, her family is "classier" than the Bush family. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if the marriage was arranged by the Bush-Pierce families, as most aristocratic family marriages were back then. Absent, "wimpy" father; balls-the-size-of-bowling-balls mother; a coddled, spoiled beyond belief son, no conception of what an examined life is like. Is it any wonder we are here today?

  • infotainment

    [Read the article: Brian Williams: "Marriage is under attack"]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    How can anyone claim that there exists any "liberal" view point in the main stream media? Alan Colmes? FOX news is de facto an organ of the GOP; the major networks are all owned by multi-national conglomerates; the WaPo, WSJ, USA Today and the NYT are decidedly not liberal. I read a midwestern daily and they purport to give equal time to both "sides", which is really a fucking joke. One day, it will be Malkin and Broder (sic), the next day Krauthammer and Dowd (sic); then Will and Friedman (sic); Krugmann gets in once a week, E.J. Dionne never. Needless to say, Glenn G never appears. NPR is decidedly NOT liberal, they seem to have evolved into self-censorship so as not to offend the GOP. And PBS gets hammered by the wing nuts because of Bill Moyers. One voice. The only place to get a leftist view point is on the web. Do you think that explains, in part, the right wing's foaming at the mouth (pace celebrities like Chris Matthews and Tom Friedman) at the inchoate "blogosphere"? The Reagan administration emasculated the vaunted "liberal" press corps, perhaps in retribution for Watergate and Viet Nam, and they have been co-opted since. The "liberal media" is a canard and has become conventional wisdom for the masses.

  • Bio and photo of Priscilla

    [Read the article: Demand answers from Time magazine]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Fluent in French, raised in Paris and a Mount Holyoke alumna. I'll bet she doesn't proclaim those factoids too loudly to her right-wing buddies.

    Has anyone suggested that people like Klein (and Friedman and Dowd and Matthews et al.) be called "self-loathing liberals"?

    http://www.siite.com/samples/time/about/biographies/senioreditorialstaff/painton.html

  • Kudos to GG from Alterman

    [Read the article: Bad stenographers]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Eric Alterman's column today humbly points/links to Glenn:

    I am unnecessary again today, and not because I'm lazy. It's because nothing I could write would justify you reading me instead of Glenn Greenwald.

    Just skim the below real quick -- OK, spend a little time with Boehlert -- and then get thee over to Salon and read all the way to the bottom, clicking on as many links for which you have the time and patience, including especially Jane Hamsher and Atrios. ... It's brilliant, brave, and tenacious reporting if you take your time and read all the way to the bottom, as far as I can discern. ... The evidence Glenn has amassed has many implications for the current state of affairs in American journalism and democracy, virtually all of them extremely, deeply disturbing. (And let's throw in this: Twenty rules of modern American journalism, here.)

    Here's the link: http://mediamatters.org/altercation/

  • Hoekstra totally in the pocket of special interests

    [Read the article: The Chicago Tribune vs. Time magazine]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The following orgs in which 100 = highest ranking. From www.myrep.info

    American Conservative Union: 100%

    ACLU: 11%

    Planned Parenthood: 0%

    Alliance for Retired Americans: 0%

    Children's Defense Fund: 0%

    Council on American-Islamic Relations: 0%

    Federation for American Immigration Reform: 86%

    The Humane Society of the United States: 0%

    Leadership Council on Civil Rights: 0%

    National Journal-Composite Conservative Score: 79%

    NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby: 0%

    US Chamber of Commerce: 81%

    Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council: 100%

    American Road and Transportation Builders Association: 100%

    Business-Industry Political Action Committee: 96%

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox