Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 266
Editor's Choice: 2
you forgot about Farouk Shami, by far the most interesting character in the gubanatorial race.
Bullshit. In my field, it is usually a condition of publication that the raw data must be made available (online or whatever.) And we gladly do that as a favor to the community anyway. Scientists usually *like* to share their data.
Obviously no one is asking for raw data that has not been used yet, so scooping is not an issue. These are publicly funded scientists. They say that their data tells us the sky is falling any day unless we adopt some pretty radical changes. So I think it is reasonable to ask to see the raw data as well as the code. Certainly after reading their emails I am not inclined to blindly trust these people.
That surely must mean that they don't think they have a leg to stand on in the open air of scientific inquiry.
I dunno, that is pretty much what I have always thought about why CRU, NASA et al refuse to release their raw data or code. Do you have another explanation for that behavior?
You think scientists publish raw data in journals? I guess you aren't in a scientific field.
FOIA requests for raw data have been turned down over and over. Now the raw data has been released by the hacker- I guess we shall soon see if anything interesting is there. But either way it goes, it is wrong for the climate scientists to withhold their raw data.
"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise."
no, this is not a normal exchange. These scientists work for US, and they have concealed data, "lost" data, and delayed on FOIA requests for quite some time now. These emails prove that they were actively avoiding the FOIA requests (against the law) and going so far as to collude to delete emails. This is NOT how science is supposed to work.
The emails might not "prove" that AGW is a "hoax" but they sure don't look good for the climate scientists.
"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise."
you fools. You have been sorely butt-used by these people.
From Phil Jones:
"The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate."
Proof of emails being deleted when confronted with an FOI request. This makes certain climate scientists look very very bad. Who could trust these guys anymore after all these shenanigans?
Cary, please get well. Eat right and take care of yourself. Look into Low-Dose Naltrexone for cancer. Your docs may not know about it because the patent has expired, thus no drug companies can make big money from it, but it is pretty much risk-free and many people are using it for cancer. It will help regulate your immune response.
ACORN was being investigated in how many states? Like 25? I don't know if Hoffman has any evidence to support his specific claims, but it doesn't seem THAT off base. Certainly thinking that ACORN might be tampering with an election should not make one a "lunatic." That you guys continue to defend this group is beyond me.
It's the SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS of bike riders that pisses me off most. Yes, thank you, I do realize that many car drivers are also a menace and I hate those dumbfucks too when they are texting or speeding or driving drunk or just being dicks but at least they aren't sticking their nose up in the air talking about how what they do is soooo good for the planet and how superior they are because they are more physically fit (teresa, size 4 at 46, hi again) and they aren't wasting any oil and blah blah blah. Do you people understand how obnoxious you are? Guess what- I WALK to work so don't lecture me about being green, I don't even need any oil to grease a bike chain.
And then I love how you "forget" to roll your one pants leg back down when you come in to work, so we all will know what a righteous warrior for the planet you are.
Also when you ride in those stupid races and inconvenience anyone living in whatever nice rural area you choose to terrorize that day, and throw your goddamn water bottles and trash all over a nice country highway- Fuck you even more.
Also I just want to say thank you to those bike riders who do follow traffic laws, stop at stop signs, etc. You're ok. Unless you wear those fucking shorts.
What deeply concerns me is that the attitudes of many of the posters here, if acted upon, can easily result in serious injury or death to a bicyclist.
Really? Does that so deeply concern you? Because what I am concerned about is the attitude and ACTIONS of most of the bike riders I see. Which can and DO result in injury and death. Why don't they share in the responsibility, in Jeff08-world?