Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Joan Walsh

Published Letters: 880
Editor's Choice: 16

Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:34 PM
Original article: Battling Dick Armey

From Joan Walsh

Ah, teresa, I'm sorry to hear that, but I've read your letters and I know you did not let him get to you: Congratulations! And thanks for writing.

I dreamed about my own father last night, who died 22 years ago...my earliest memories are talking to him in the morning before he went to work, and I do believe his careful attention is why men like Dick Armey don't fluster me at all. I've always been listened to, and misogynists like Armey seem like the weirdos to me, not the norm. And I'm glad my daughter has a father like that as well.

Lots of women don't, but they figure out how to stand up for themselves nonetheless, like you did. Thanks for what you do.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 04:09 PM
Original article: Thanks, Tom Daschle

From Joan Walsh

Good point, auntie cairo. I also liked that he said this, to Brian Williams, who was trying to argue the Daschle situation meant "Washington won."

Obama: "No, the fact of the matter is, Tom Daschle pulled out today, and I'm here on television saying, 'I screwed up.'"

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 05:29 PM
Original article: Thanks, Tom Daschle

From Joan Walsh

Silenced, that's very good.

E.A. Dawsoni, I think that's part of what happened to me on Sunday. I'm sitting there getting ready to do my taxes, just like all the little people, and I'm listening to people defend Daschle and Geithner and thinking, This is a new Democratic regime? I think a lot of us are sitting at our kitchen tables finding these debates about fairness are very personal these days.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 05:47 PM
Original article: Thanks, Tom Daschle

From Joan Walsh

Anonymust, I thought the same thing. For sure the NYT folks read Glenn...imho.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 05:48 PM
Original article: Thanks, Tom Daschle

From Joan Walsh

fishfry, is it catty because I'm a woman? I was harder on Brooks, btw. Please.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 06:53 PM
Original article: Thanks, Tom Daschle

From Joan Walsh

bernbart, we've been agreeing lately, but today, frankly, you've reverted to your 2008 role as an "Anything, Obama!" apologist.

Daschle doesn't need you, Obama does. This was a bad choice on Obama's part, and if I didn't say it clearly enough: It ain't about the limousine, although that looked like hell. It's about the whole revolving door, and about the fact that there was almost zero reason Daschle would deliver the kind of reform we need.

I could be wrong about that, I admit it, but the corporate/government revolving door, among Democrats and Republicans, seems like the biggest obstacle to genuinely populist reform of anything. If people think Daschle is the best Obama can do, well, I disagree. That's not what Obama promised. That's not why he got elected.

I do recognize that some people here were always simply Obama promoters, regardless of what he did. But not most.

And anyone who's doing their own taxes and nonetheless siding with Daschle, well, I hate to sound Marxist but that's a kind of false consciousness. If you've got a daily limo, provided by an employer/client, and you're self-employed (a lot of Daschle defenders have jobs and are pleading ignorance about what benefits might be taxable), and you claim you don't know your limo is taxable (oh, and, you were partly responsible for writing the tax code)...oh man, we have such lovely compassionate people on Salon. God bless you, really.

Puh-lease.

Thursday, February 5, 2009 01:02 PM

From Joan Walsh

Calif Mike, did you miss my cover story yesterday about the economy? Please. I honestly don't envy Kristol's ability to be wrong about everything and still find MSM employment. Can you imagine that?

Thursday, February 5, 2009 04:41 PM

From Joan Walsh

Happy birthday, gehgoeson!

Thursday, February 5, 2009 11:51 PM

From Joan Walsh

Readerreader, thanks for hanging around, but really, why didn't George W. Bush raise taxes to pay for his wars and things? Please. Such double standards.

zoltan newberry, I can't sincerely say thanks for hanging around, and I always try to be sincere here. But thanks for not, like, I guess, hurting anyone with your ideas. Really! The things you say about me don't matter. But you probably should get some help.

gehgoeson...I always enjoy a birthday week or so, and I hope you do too.

Monday, February 9, 2009 03:55 PM

From Joan Walsh

artieshawjr, that's true: I never was and never will be a mindless Obama supporter. When he does well, I praise lavishly. But he was late out of the gate selling this one. If you're looking for someone who checks her judgment in the cloakroom with her Shepard Fairey sweatshirt and "Yes We Can" unbrella -- look elsewhere!

Monday, February 9, 2009 04:51 PM

From Joan Walsh

Absolutely, gehgoeson. You can also be an Obama supporter and still critique, even oppose, certain Obama decisions. There's been a demand for slavish and in my opinion mindless devotion, though, from too many bullies, going back more than a year. I just have low tolerance for that.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 04:03 PM
Original article: A town hall heartbreak

From Joan Walsh

BruceRogers, I just deleted two of your posts. You can make those points and link to your blog for the names, you can count the number of economists and tell us how many there are, but you can't dominate the letters thread with a list like that. Not twice.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 04:41 PM
Original article: A town hall heartbreak

From Joan Walsh

Bruce, don't be so silly. Make your points, don't mark my comment thread with hundreds of names. It's not censorship. Argue, don't browbeat us with names.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 09:52 PM
Original article: A town hall heartbreak

From Joan Walsh

Calif Mike, thanks for the sexist commentary, comparing me to a schoolgirl. As many people on this thread can tell you, I've never been an Obama cheerleader. I've come to respect him; I'm also worried that he was late selling his plan. In another thread a reader accuses me of insufficient boosterism. I say what I see, I always have. Santos L. Helper will tell you that....

Wednesday, February 11, 2009 07:25 AM
Original article: Party on, GOP

From Joan Walsh

Thanks, artemis. Did you see what I said on Hardball? Come back and talk to me when you do.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009 07:55 AM
Original article: Party on, GOP

From Joan Walsh

Wow, assezmalicieuse, it's shocking how even progressive people like to point fingers and take a bootstrap approach to public problems.

Yes, we had a very, very active PTA and teachers' union, we vote for school bonds almost every year it seems, and our kids are no dirtier than other kids (!) and yes, we still had mice. I almost always agree with you, but this letter blew my mind.

Most Active Letters Threads

530

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
128

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
126

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers
115

I live in a van down by Duke University

How do I afford grad school without going into debt? A '94 Econoline, bulk food and creative civil disobedience
113

I survived Glenn Beck's Christmas spectacular

The preposterous showman brings his holiday book, and waterworks, to the stage and screen. Lights! Camera! Jesus!

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon