Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 4797
Editor's Choice: 57
Readerreader: "I find it passing strange there is mandatory content in any such session; i.e., patients "shall" be told they can pull the plug and reduce care if they simply come into the hospital with a heart problem."
Saying you find a stay, innocuous bit of wording "strange" is very different from your earier claim, which mirrored Palin's. You've completely backpedaled on this entire point. Why not just admit it? You are now completely outside the realm of Palin's assertion.
Readerreader: "More fundamentally, there is a sub rosa problem with Mr. Obama..."
Here comes the misdirection! You lost the main point, so you bring out a bunch of stale, years-old points that have absolutely nothing to do with the matter at hand. WEAK. Weak on all counts, and on all levels.
Readerreader: "All of that leads to concern, as to what Obama is doing. It's a concern I fully share, given his record."
Oh, so now it's a "concern." No longer do you support your original claim. No longer is there a death panel. No longer do you agree with Palin.
Now you're just "concerned."
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Nothing new under the sun.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2009/07/27/health-care-bill-page-425-the-truth.htm
Nice job trying to backpedal, Readerreader.
First you are caught in your ignorance. Then you up the ante by showing your true hateful colors (e.g. "KKKofA, Rezco, Ayres," etc.)
By the way -- what is with your inability to spell Ayers' name correctly? You misspell the name every....single....time....
Using Trig as the basis for a disingenous policial argument shows just what a classless, no-integrity piece of work she is.
It doesn't seem like it would take much mental discipline to separate his murders from his problems, but apparently it does.
I thought the Unabomber manifesto was interesting and made some good points. That doesn't mean the Unabomber wasn't a grade-A homicidal asshole, though.
On another note, where does anybody get the idea that in the olden days, men didn't have the same problems getting women that they do today? Since the caveman days, there were probably males who couldn't get females and had to sit in the corner of their huts masturbating to primitive drawings they made in the dirt with a stick.