Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 58
Editor's Choice: 2
This is what my $45 a year membership pays for? This is what you think is important &em; whether the cancer-riddled wife of my former Senator knew about his infidelities in 2006 or 2007?
It's obviously the most important story these days, after all, it's not as though:
I could go on with other hypothetical issues, but I've got real work to do...
So, yeah, Tom, inquiring minds want to know about the sexual infidelity of a former Senator who no longer has a political future, because it's obviously the most important issue facing Americans, these days.
The reason I chose to subscribe to Salon five years ago (and not just read the free, sponsored site) and have continued to do so is because I welcomed the concept of a media outlet beholden only to the facts and its readers and not the corporate sponsors, or its parent corporation's appliance division.
Taking my toys and going home won't have any effect on the tone and subject matter -- it simply removes me from the conversation.
Voicing my dissatisfaction with the article snippet in question, however, is topical and I think, given that I pretty clearly stated the subjects I'd prefer Salon work on, sufficient and effective.
The Edwards story reveals the tendency of the media to cover shallow, sensational topics that easily summarized and reinforce polarizing tendencies amongst consumers, rather than difficult issues of far greater import, simply because that requires imparting a functional level of knowledge to the audience, something that is far too difficult, given the 30-45 second (in this case 3-4 paragraph) length of modern "news" segments. It may be enough to critique the latest red carpet fashions, but it isn't sufficient for an intelligent discourse on topics of contemporary and future importance.
Edwards had an affair. It's not an issue germane or important to the national political landscape, anymore. He's not a Senator (and he was a pretty poor one, anyway). He's not a nominee. He's not going to be a cabinet member (that was over the moment he admitted the affair). He didn't perjure himself. He didn't falsify legal documents or intelligence. He's not your father, husband, brother, cousin, nephew or uncle -- it doesn't affect your life in any way and it's none of your business. Furthermore, his wife has asked that the media consider it a personal matter and move on. So why is it still being tossed about like a rabbit carcass between wolves? Especially when there are so many more important issues that affect far more than the lives of 3 people.