Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Dan Gillmor

Published Letters: 5

Wednesday, April 30, 2008 09:41 AM

"Close friendship" with sources? Wow...

In addition to Williams' (sadly unsurprising) obliviousness to the central issue is another fairly remarkable admission: He wrote of the two generals: "As I'm sure is obvious to even a casual viewer, I quickly entered into a close friendship with both men. . . ."

Obvious? Professional TV interviewers are always chummy on-screen with "sources" of this kind; it's part of the act. But rarely does that mean they've become close personal friends.

Journalists at organizations purporting to be neutral should avoid interviewing close personal friends to begin with. But when they do these interviews, they should not assume the relationship is obvious; they should disclose it each time. Then the listener has some useful information to weigh about whether the journalist is likely to be asking difficult questions.

Again, this is is a relatively small issue next to the abuse the Times uncovered.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008 12:16 PM

The Journalistic Issue

This piece is kind to the NYT's Risen. Maybe too kind.

Risen either didn't know that the statement by the Obama advisor was false, or did know and failed to challenge him on it. Either way, it's another case where stenography replaces reporting -- and especially troubling from this reporter, whose work has been crucial to our even knowing about the issue.

Sunday, November 2, 2008 09:24 AM

Al Gore helped this meme gain strength

On Sept. 30, 2001, Gore went in front of a Democratic party audience and said, "George W. Bush is my commander in chief." The context -- the wake of the 9/11 attacks -- made this understandable, but I suspect more Americans got the notion of a supreme civilian commander from that speech than from any other single source.

Thursday, December 4, 2008 11:11 AM

On the positive side...

...we may see some Republicans start to rediscover the value of civil liberties, as some did during the Clinton years...

Thursday, September 3, 2009 12:21 PM

Broder in 1974

Re your update citing Brad DeLong's post as evidence of Broder lying about supporting Nixon's impeachment:

I don't read it the same way at all. In fact, the stuff he quoted from Broder in 1974 sounds more like an implicit warning that bad consequences will come from not impeaching.

That said, I'm sorry Broder didn't retire some years ago; he's a great example of a columnist who's long since run out of things to say.

Most Active Letters Threads

392

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
167

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
109

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
55

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon