Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
vaporland
Published Letters: 500 Editor's Choice: 9
What we saw yesterday was only the primal, initial version of what is to come.
The OS X operating system is completely scalable. It can run on almost any microprocessor. What does that mean?
Developers who want to run their software effortlessly on multiple hardware devices and platforms can develop for Mac OS X, then with little effort, port their software everywhere.
Connecting to Microsoft enterprise servers and networks will be just as easy as connecting to Yahoo and Google, but the consumer product space is infinitely larger than the business market. Obsessing over corporate connectivity misses the big picture.
Patents will prevent competitors from easily duplicating Apple's elegant efforts. Apple has learned a lot of lessons from its bruising battles with Microsoft. This time, all of their bases are covered.
I can't say it enough: Apple possesses a stable, scalable, portable, flexible, visually compelling, universally applicable and DESIRABLE user interface that is light years ahead of any so-called 'competition'.
Software systems designed for OS X can run on cellphones, if Apple wants to allow it. Or an intelligent portable DVD player. Or an intelligent digital video camera. Or a handheld gaming device. Or a console gaming device. Or a microwave, fridge, dishwasher or dryer.
Or, please lord, an intelligent universal remote control.
Why would I want to run Mac applications on a universal remote? I wouldn't want to run entire applications, but it will be great to have a stable, consistent, robust platform to deploy pieces of applications and make connections to existing applications and systems.
Imagine if, when you buy some new gadget, you could 'add buttons' to your universal remote by merely downloading software updates, instead of throwing away a plastic device and buying a new one.
Heck, if it only costs me $1 every time, I would probably go for it. No physical product changes hands, just data. And money.
Imagine an intelligent digital still camera with the power of Adobe Photoshop in a form that the common man could use effectively.
The blinking LCD clock on the VCR is very 'last century', the epitome of technology possibilities unrealized.
Unrealized possibilities like crackberry keyboard buttons and matchbook sized web browsers and $3 ringtone downloads and crashing Windows CE devices and punching '4444466666' in the proper sequence on your cellphone keypad just so you can text message 'hi mom'.
What this announcement is about is finally implementing intelligence in devices across the consumer gadgetry spectrum.
The bar has been raised. Nobody will be satisfied with less.
Watch the keynote video. http://stream.qtv.apple.com/events/jan/j47d52oo/m_8848125_350_ref.mov
Consider that no one can possibly begin to predict the infinite ways that this technology is going to affect common people's lives.
Will Apple make mistakes? Sure. Are they going to be in the driver's seat? You bet.
Your myopic perspective reflects the limits of your vision.
Besides the fact that I have never seen a universal remote that could be used by Homer Simpson / Joe Sixpack, that was meant to be an example of possibilities, not something on the drawing board today.
Most of what you all are saying parrots similar comments when the iPod first arrived: it's too expensive, not enough capacity, hard drives suck, battery sucks / can't remove it, Asia makes them better, Apple doesn't have experience in this market, iPod doesn't have my favorite audio format, yadda yadda yadda . . .
RE MP3 players, who's crying now? Apple will make mistakes, of course.
But, for all of you 'get a horse' folks, time will tell . . .
Believe me, I am not an Apple fanboy. I threw away an iPod rather than navigate their snooty 'genius bar' scheduling for service, even though the iPod was under warranty.
They tried to sell me a $99 service contract on a $99 iPod shuffle so I could move to the 'front of the line'. I didn't drink that glass of Kool-Aid.
Apple definitely has issues with manufacturing quality control - it will be interesting to see how durable an iPhone is the fifth time it is dropped onto a hardwood floor - and how this will be rectified for the customer if it breaks.
I've waited in the queue for service at CompUSA, Circuit City, Apple, Cingular, Sprint and Verizon. I'd rather have a root canal.
I accept the fact the the cellphone market is totally brutal with rapacious players possessing deep pockets and strong relationships with service providers.
I also feel it is a certainty that Appple will sell every single iPhone it ever manufactures at whatever price point they choose.
We have not even addressed the potential impact of portable VoIP WiFi telephony on the current industry paradigm.
My excitement stems from the potential derived from applying the user interface exhibited in the iPhone to other electronic consumer products.
I appreciate the civility of your responses, and I apologize if any of my ranting seemed rabid or personally directed.
he's done better than this . . .
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
