Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Michael Harold

Published Letters: 498     Editor's Choice: 3

  • @nebuchadnezzar -- Hopefully you won't mind

    [Read the article: How much credence should Gen. Petraeus' reports be given?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Democrat absurdity

    Republican talking points paragraph:

    Look, how dense can you be? It has been explained over and over again, that steady, although uneven, progress was being made through the latter part of 2004 and and through 2005 and into the early part of 2006. In large measure this was due to the success of General Petraeus' training program for the Iraqi armed forces and police. There was good reason for optimism that the insurgency was in its last throes. Then al Qaeda hit the jackpot by blowing up the Samarra mosque. Generals Abizaid and Casey, with their hidebound by the book thinking, failed to appreciate the fallout from this and to respond adequately to this provocation. General Petraeus, who is universally respected for his strategic vision and out of the box thinking, is now turning things around once again.

    Democrat talking point paragraph:

    General Petraeus was unanimously confirmed by the Senate early this year. Now Democrats make themselves look utterly absurd with their backstabbing attack on General Petraeus six months later.

    Sometimes you write like a goof. That's OK. That's America.

    Sometimes you write like a political operative. When you do that it throws me off a little.

  • @ALupin re: if we'd stayed in 'Nam

    [Read the article: How much credence should Gen. Petraeus' reports be given?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I'm fed up to hear the right-wing wackos claim that if we'd stayed in 'Nam we shoulda, coulda, mighta.

    I would agree with you except for one thing. Vietnam is one of the few places we have ever occupied that we left.

    For example, we are still in Korea.

    We are still in every other place we ever invaded and/or occupied, even those countries that we liberated after WWII, countries that are now our allies.

    Here is a list of countries and territories in which US military bases are located:

    1. Afghanistan
    2. American Samoa
    3. Antigua
    4. Aruba
    5. Australia
    6. Austria
    7. Bahama Islands
    8. Bahrain
    9. Belgium
    10. Bosnia
    11. Bulgaria
    12. Canada
    13. Colombia
    14. Cuba
    15. CuraƧao
    16. Denmark
    17. Ecuador
    18. El Salvador
    19. France
    20. Germany
    21. Greece
    22. Greenland
    23. Guam
    24. Honduras
    25. Hong Kong
    26. Iceland
    27. Indian Ocean (Diego Garcia)
    28. Indonesia
    29. Italy
    30. Japan
    31. Johnston Atoll
    32. Korea

    http://www.monthlyreview.org/docs/0302map1.pdf

    We will never leave Iraq until we are forced out.

  • @Pocoroba re: Hearts and Minds

    [Read the article: How much credence should Gen. Petraeus' reports be given?]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Yeah, whatever happened to "Slam Dunk", "Shock and Awe", "Hearts and Minds", "Mission Accomplished" and "Bring it On".

    You asked for a refutation of facts. Where General Petraeus is concerned, I see very few facts and very many claims. There are few or no facts to refute. The claims are claims. As such, they are refuted by counter-examples such as US and Iraqi death and injury counts, suicide bombings, IED attacks, assassinations, kidnappings and all the other events you can read about on Juan Cole's website.

    I cringe when I see the words Fallujah, Kirkuk, Basra, Hillah, Mosul and Nasiriyah. (And to think I didn't even used to know what country those cities were in.) Cluster bombs, napalm and white phosphor came to mind. Yeah, we sure showed them.

  • No form of government can survive endless war without becoming totalitarian

    [Read the article: Bush's magical shield from criminal prosecution]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Their wrongdoing is extreme, and only equally extreme corrective measures will suffice. -- GG

    Continuous war, both within a nation and with other nations, is the means whereby any form of governance can be turned to totalitarianism. Our wars are now wars, not of self defense, but of aggression under the guise of self defense. They are criminal wars. As a result, our society is now evidencing many of the symptoms of a totalitarian state. It may have a happy face on it where the majority of citizens are concerned, but that does not change the fact that we have become increasingly totalitarian. Under the guise of anti-terrorism, we have put in place both legal and illegal mechanisms that make our society increasingly bear resemblance to Stalinist Russia. We are being made to live in constant fear of our lives, our security, our future and even our individual freedom. We are becoming a police state.

    As a constitutional lawyer, you think in terms of legal remedies under the Constitution. I am not a lawyer, but I do know that the small steps we are taking to preserve our society from the hostile takeover of our nation by a gang of criminals are insufficient and were always insufficient.

    We have been in worse spots. We had a civil war, two world wars and a cold war that threatened global annihilation and we survived as a nation. I believe that we can survive this as well, but only if we force the issues. Small steps will not suffice. Either we are a democracy or we are not. If we are not, the sooner we know it, the better.

    The first thing we must do is stop the war in Iraq by cutting off the money immediately. The second thing we must do is to treat the those who have committed high crimes against the Constitution and against humanity as criminals under the law. A good start would be to take a hard line and to arrest those who are currently in contempt of Congress.

    George Bush is and has always been a symptom of US weakness. Everything this administration has done was done from a position of weakness.

    We do not have to be weak. We can be strong again if we choose.

  • By the time you get to a military coup it's too late

    [Read the article: Bush's magical shield from criminal prosecution]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    I'm trying to think of all the times that a military coup has resulted in the restoration of a democracy.

    Hmmm . . . (I'm open to suggestions).

    Since the President is going to veto any and all legislation that would be worth anything, and since it seems to take a supermajority in Congress to pass a bill (When did that happen? And what good is a Congressional majority if you now have to have the other two branches of government in your pocket before you can do anything?) why don't we just spend the time impeaching Bush and Cheney instead?

    And let's try not to worry quite so much about how it would reflect on Pelosi.

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox