Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

RealName

Published Letters: 1979
Editor's Choice: 68

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 02:31 PM

Yes that's wondeful

Make fun of me. Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog Blog blog blog

Did you fix the world yet? How is that shiny new Congress you got there? Working out?

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 02:39 PM

You are free to imagine I think whatever makes you happy

None of you have actually asked. But again, feel free....

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:03 PM

Let's review, again

In France and Germany, the government counts every single person not working as unemployed. We do not. Our unemployment is at least 50 % understated and probably more. As soon as your unemployment insurance (which the Repubs would love to terminate) lapses, you are no longer counted.

In France you actually have unlimited unemployment benefits. Im not sure that's a real solution. After all it creates a great deal of stress on the retirement system. In either case structural unemployment is the base or optimal unemployment. In France that's a little under 11%. This means that if unemployment falls below that, it's inflationary.

Also, France has the highest productivity per worker hour of any country in the world followed by Belgium. Americans produce more gross because they work far longer hours.

By what measure? Please specify. And it's not far longer hours it's about 17% more hours

Second, oh yeah, being a dental tech at $18,000 per year with no benefits is a great strategy. I'm 60 years old so I don't have the same worries as others, but my plan B is certainly NOT to take a 90% pay cut.

I didn't know the economy was intended to guarantee your living standard. I'm sorry you got caught out but that's not really the fault of some exogenous event. Perhaps as an American retiree you should consider moving to Portugal where you could live comfortably with just Social Security.

See the point is, shaking your fist at heaven isn't a practical option. Simply ennacting a law that makes labor and products more expensive isn't really going to work. That's like a quota system and quota systems and trade barriers don't function well. For instance, a tarrif on Canadian lumber makes homebuilding more expensive. A tarrif on labor simply makes labor more expensive or decreases the demand for labor.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:06 PM
Original article: The O'Murdoch factor

The Iraqi Minister of Information likes the cut of your job.

State Ownership of media is the solution.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:09 PM
Original article: Bush's favorite historian

Take is up with Joan Walsh then

In another article many of the posters there openly advocate a State Run media, exclusively. Maybe you can cash in on that and rename this esteemed place Vremya.com (that domain is actually available if you'd like to buy it and donate it back to Joan.)

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:12 PM

William Timberman

You're talking to the wrong crowd here. They're world beaters at snark, insult, namecalling, bitchery and smugness. Blogito Ergo Sum.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:20 PM

Talk about intended consequences

Brazil uses sugar beets for ethanol. This has about 8 units of energy for every unit of energy spent creating it. The US uses corn which produces 1.7 units of energy per unit of energy input. But imagine if we sold the Brazilians on growing our sugar beets for us and they tore up a chunk of rain forest the size of Ireland. It might not end of being that green in the end.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 04:22 PM

I'm blogging about it

That's almost the same thing as doing something.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 08:21 PM
Original article: God grief

I don't get it

Chris Hitchens, drunken ex rock throwing curmudgeon, former Communist and Marxist (yeah no one's died on their altar, right?) preaching about the absurdity of God to an audience who's too cool for school? What's the point?

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 08:24 PM
Original article: King Kaufman's Sports Daily

JMM666

MLB DOES have 10 day contracts. They're called personal services contracts. Roger Clemens had one last year.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 08:30 PM
Original article: Tom the Dancing Bug

I'm sorry I'll make sure you get another copy of that memo

The ome from Salon.com that says clearly white people are evil and you can't claim they are maligned in any way.

Cordially,

Human Resources

Thursday, May 10, 2007 04:51 AM
Original article: The impertinent prince

Cast ye the first stone?

The British royal family has had its share of drunken coke fueled divorcing in public tabloid can we just keep those inbred assholes indoors permanently moments themselves.

Lady Di?

Chuck and Camilla?

Princess Anne?

Prince Harry in a Nazi Costume?

Philip's alcohol fueled rages against foreigners and Jews?

Fergie?

Thursday, May 10, 2007 05:02 AM
Original article: God grief

Maybe he just loathes Rowan Williams

Which is unfair because Rowan Williams is just naturally a loathesome character. A gadfly, a propagandist, an attention whore, a piler-on for every hot cause of the day. Maybe that's what Chris Hitchens objects to. The fundamentally shallow and areligious public face of many of the more 'liberal' and progressive religious faces in the west today. It's not so much that they get the mob to go out and kill in their God's name (what does Chris Hitchens say about the Balkans?) it's that they annoint themselves moral arbiters while taking openly political positions.

Thursday, May 10, 2007 05:08 AM

It wouldn't matter at all if

A) more than a few people turned up to vote.

B) elections weren't decided by less than the statistical error.

This is what draws people into the conspiracy theories. And yet if the millions of voters ages 18-25 put down the bong and got their cheeto stained fat asses to the booth once in a while, things might be different. But you can't tax or legislate away apathy.

Thursday, May 10, 2007 05:57 AM

I think the WH successfully

Waited out America's attention span. Deny deny deny deny stonewall. It works great. Without an aggressive Congress that wants to do more than simply embarrass and humiliate the administration, all this ultimately goes nowhere. Gozalez looks like the good dumb loyal water carrier he is. Congress gets to be on camera bristling with indignation and nothing changes.

Thursday, May 10, 2007 06:01 AM
Original article: The impertinent prince

I swear as god is my witness I thought turkey's could fly

At this point don't we know what we're getting with this guy? Is anyone genuinely shocked? Or are we just sort of irritated for the sake of the cameras? I mean it's George Bush for god's sake. What did you think would happen?

Most Active Letters Threads

502

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
257

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
122

Bigotry wins in Switzlerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon