Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

RealName

Published Letters: 1979
Editor's Choice: 68

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 06:53 PM

You should talk to an actuary

OBGYN malpractice premiums are at most 17% of revenue. All OBGYNs run out close up and reopen as high pregnancy specialists. This makes them somewhat more lawsuit proof.

Then talk to an attorney. The average settlement, which is about 50% of the cases is less than $100,000.

Maternity care is a cost center because HMO's make it a cost center. Vaginal delivery you're out of the hospital in a day. Even churning the beds that rapidly can't make up for services you don't deliver and don't get paid for.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:02 PM
Original article: God save the queen!

I was hoping Salon would at least give lip service to the new Irish power sharing deal

Silly me. All Bush all Iraq all neocon all anti Israel all the time. At least you've got a theme. What possibilities squandered by Salon. I recommend you go to a graphic novel format.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:03 PM
Original article: The O'Murdoch factor

Who owns al-Jazeera?

Oh a king. Sorry my bad.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:10 PM

If that were a college essay

I'd give it a C? Seems horribly disjoint and scribbly. Hard to pin down any theme. I do agree with the comments on the Dems who seem to confuse extremist namecalling with politics.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:18 PM

What is 'sending labor overseas'

You can't track job cuts here correlated with creating a foreign subsidiary the goes out and employs their own people and then make an assumption about the direction of capital. All your tax would is cause me to rollup the revenues a different way. I would put overseas incorporation at or near the top of the list as well. And even if it weren't the same corporate entity all you'd manage to do to is create a retaliatory duty or cost addr. I wonder how many people would pay twice as much for an orange or a fish?

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:21 PM

You are all retarded

That is all.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 07:32 PM

I work in an industry with tons of competition

Cost driven competition and all the players, where it is legal to do so, are in the same boat as it were, offshoring-wise. The fact is that job for job if my skills are the same or more or less the same as Rajiv in Bangalore then I really don't offer up any advantage. If you had two people of equal skill and ability, one in NYC and one in Sioux Falls which would you go with? Ergo a job in Winston Salem or a job in Malaysia, skill for skill job for job is a no brainer.

Detroit faced the same problem. Know what they did? Automated. The jobs went to robots. So today labor is only 8-9% of the total cost of production. Otherwise you'd be forced to buy either a $300,000 handmade car or a $4,500 Chinese death box.

The reason that jobs go away is because they are the wrong jobs to have here. You need to find a different job not another job. That's about skills and education. If you are a business owner then you really need to figure out how being here is a worthwhile proposition.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 08:32 PM

nkennedy

Where do get that it's libertarian to suggest that lower skill jobs or jobs which are portable go to where they cost less? It's like illegal immigration - would you like to pay $3 for a tomato? I'm not sure I would just to ensure that a farmer doesn't have to pay massive fines for employing illegals and instead employs Americans. See you want to look at everything the way I guess you were taught, as a class struggle. But it's not, no matter how hard Howard Zinn pimps that idea.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 05:12 AM
Original article: The O'Murdoch factor

The Dow Jones Corporation isn't a public company in the ordinary sense

I just want to point out that the Dow Jones corporation is a closely held corporation that's more than 60% owned by one family. Seemingly the private nature of its holdings have no effect on this issue.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007 05:19 AM

I don't recall defending anyone

All I did was point out that your heroes, if anything, are as untroubled by 'law' justice. and decency as anyone else. But please please, go on. You amuse me with your snarling.

It was funny to watch in ZA a few years ago when Mandela was at the apotheosis of his influence and then it turned out that his wife was stealing from the government and had a hand in assassinating a few people as well. Public opinion was rather divided on it. Many people fummfummed and tried to distance themselves but an equal number of ANC partisans actually supported her under the rubric that, well, in a revolution, sometimes you just have to kill a few innocent people. These are the people who run ZA today. I guess 'rule of law' depends on who get to enforce the law.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon