Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 4
It's not bad enough that she's a looney-tune, huh?
Look, I despise Sarah Palin as much as the next person. But this picture and the whole premise of the article is insanely offensive.
I heard Newt Gingrich accuse John Stewart of sexism the other night, and I almost laughed myself out of my chair. But now I see that they're right - thanks for giving those scumbags a valid point!
Embedding audience plants was the most expedient way for McCain to silence his outraged critics. One plant was a black guy (motivational speaker James T Harris) who likes McCain, the logical conclusion we're meant to jump to is that McCain is black-guy approved. So to me it looks like the feeble oldster was another plant, a stereotypical yet harmless racist whom he can admonish and look all mavericky.
There have been a handful of commenters chiming in about the writer "watching too much TV" or "placing too much value on a show." I was just wondering, do you folks also write to movie reviewers and complain that they watch too many movies, or do the same to book critics? It's these writers jobs to deconstruct these art forms, you retards, and some us of appreciate it.
And as for those of you who don't get "Mad Men", fine, there's always "Fat Bachelor" or whatever disposable garbage you actually do watch. Don't worry, no one's going to waste two sentences on that.
Did you even read this article?
It's a book, first off, not a film. Moreover, your story, while no doubt poignant to you, is irrelevant to what sounds like an interesting story.