Than Andrew tries to make it. Obama depends upon the Communist Party of China to fund his deficits. They have loudly and publicly instructed him to reduce these deficits. He must do so, because the alternative is skyrocketing interest rates just at the time we've foolishly taken on too much public dept.

To the gentleman who states:

"GOP to take office and run up the largest increase in budget deficits any of us have seen in our lifetimes."

Bullshit. The obama 1-yr deficit is equal to 8 years of Bush. This country will pay dearly for Obama's (and to a lesser extent, Bush's) misguided attempts to reflate a bubble economy and achieve a standard of living we could never really afford. It WILL fail, and the next crash will make last October and since look like a tea party with the queen.

"The margin of error is plus or minus four percentage points, however, so Democrats might be rightfully tempted to dismiss that result."

Pretend that this isn't happening and further enrage independent voters. Keep trying to marginalize realists in the middle class as "teabaggers." Keep having long arguments about how to distribute funds we don't have.

Obama is pretty much the worst president in the modern era and voters have picked up on it quicker than I would have guessed. I never would have expected, one year ago, that he would be unambiguously worse than the dipshit he followed. But there it is.

The only hope is divided government; one year down, one to go.

You want to relax? Do it on the couch, not during your commute. Driving is a difficult, dangerous full-time job. It is not 'down time' for you to think about other priorities. US roads would be much safer and less congested if more people understood that.

If it is too difficult for you to pay full attention for 2 hours daily, don't live an hour from work.

Our roads are a shared resource. If large numbers of other drivers are angry at you, it's pretty stupid to blame them. I'm not sure exactly what you're doing to enrage people, but trust me, this doesn't happen to everyone.

Stay right except to pass and go the speed of traffic, whether this is 10 below, right at, or 10 above the speed limit. And cut your shit with letting "anyone who wants in" in front of you. Your boyscout bullshit is helping the one person you let in, and wasting the time, gas, and brakes of the 10 people behind you.

I wasn't making fun of your furniture; everyone likes nice stuff. I was making fun of you for posting about it repeatedly on Salon. I'd insult you some more (you're like a barn, target-wise), but you'd only stop fellating yourself for 30 seconds and type back some more drivel.

p.s.

1. 'Twas" IS a bit much

2. I can't believe you didn't tell me to Capitalize 'Platonic' in that context. I was SURE I'd hear about that.

Your 1st post was weak; your second is a fucking platonic ideal of weakness.

You didn't have a point to prove, let alone get my help on the topic. Your accusation of racism is no more meaningful than your prior claim to have had intercourse with my mother whilst she wore a paper bag on her head. As with most of your posts, twas just word-spew from a superannuated adolescent.

Incidentally, you could likely never get "under my skin," even if I knew you. You certainly cannot do so via 8th-grade level taunts that end with 'LOL.'

Have a pleasant rant or two for me, Osiris.

Probably shouldn't answer, but it's a slow pm:

No offense, dude, but how would a raging dumbfuck like you know the difference between a pseudo-intellectual and an actual intellectual?

None taken. You do the best you can. Actual intellectuals demonstrate success and break new ground in learning. Pseudos, like you, spout shallow, predictable clichés on Salon and believe they have expressed something profound (or at least interesting).

Isn't the term "pseudo-intellectual" just a term that angry, resentful, under-educated dumbfucks use to broadcast their frustration at folks who are smarter than they are?

No. See above. It is possible that under-educated people like those you describe might use the term, but I have never heard one of the few people I know who fit that description do so.

Maybe I should take your angry, ignorant word for it, though.

We get it, dude: you hate black people and anybody smarter than you.

You don't get a fucking thing, loudmouth. I don't have an opinion on "black people." I don't hate anyone, let alone an anonymous group of tens of millions. Grow up, you race baiting dick-breath.

Big fuckin' whoop - you wanna cookie?

LOL

Isn't 'LOL' what fucktards say to end texts? Go write about your petit bourgeois furniture, peabrain. It's tedious, but way more interesting than your opinion on me.

"Perry has become famous making simple stuff.... movies that are really more propaganda than art."

Sure has, Skip. And this one is more of the same. This is moralistic pablum like 'Madea.' The difference is that this pap is aimed at pseudo-intellectuals with multiple "cultural studies" classes on their transcripts. Bull's-eye, as the letters show.

This review reads like self-parody, only not funny. The assertion that all black Americans are in part like the character in this film is a perfect example of this. Great read on Obama though - not too far off mine, in fact.

"

What we are seeing is economic death by massive debt overdose, and the very opposite of a cure.

"

And this so-called reform of health care (more accurately the Pharma and Insurance Profit Guarantee Act of 2009) is the method by which Congress will attempt to fool Americans into the belief that the enormous tax burden they are preparing to lay upon the middle class is somehow for their taxpayers' own good.