The issue, I think, is not one of racism or the belief that Iraqis are not civilized enough to appreciate democracy, its the fallacy in assuming the Iraqi people would embrace western style democracy as a superior form of government. The problem is not our prejudice against Iraqis, but our arrogant bias toward our way of government.

The government this administration sought to create in Iraq is what this administration assumed was the best government, as in our style of government with free market overtones; a neo-con utopia. However, the government created was alien to any government the Iraqis had lived under and without any foundation for them to believe it was the best form of government to live under.

No one ever bothered to ask why the founding fathers did not model the US government on the parliamentary system used by England, though that was the best democracy of the time. In many ways, it was likely that they didn't trust it, at least in its complete form, even if you replace king with president, and House of Lords with Senate.

The same may well apply in Iraq where a Sunni minority views the current democratically elected government is nothing more than a system designed to ensure Shiite dominance. The Shiites only respect the government to the extent it is a tool for furthering their own aims, which may be counterproductive to our concept of democracy; such as creating an Islamic state based upon Sharia Law. The Kurds trust the government we have imposed upon them only so long as it grants them tacit if not outright independence.

It may be that because this new governing model is both foreign, untested and untrusted, that so many disparate Iraqi factions are exercising their political rights with the gun and the explosive rather than the vote and the filibuster.

Wow! A true kool aid drinking warmonger. He doesn't get that Bush sought this war as little more than corporate takevover with tanks and smart bombs. Lieberman actually thought he was fighting the good fight. And of course, being a Dem he wasn't invited to the secret meetings or given the secret teachings not included in the Book of NeoConomicon, which explained what it was really all about. Lieberman, with a kiss, actually thinks he was given the true secret handshake. Typical Jew.

(yes that was made sarcastically so don't call me anti-semite)

Now he has gone all loose cannon on them and asking America, well not just America but rich people, well not just rich people, but rich donors to the Neoconomicon to actually sacrifice. Well not there children, (how ridiculous that would be, unless you're Jim Webb)but their hard won capital gains, corporate buyouts for incompetence, publicity income for flashing sexual body parts and inheritances. This is clearly treason and obviously Senator Vinegar Joe doesn't support the troops. If I was anyone from Congress I wouldn't stand too close to that traiter lest you be killed by friendly fire.

Still its a great idea and I hope someone, Hillary maybe?, further the proposal days after his assassination as the Memorial Joe Lieberman War Tax. You know, kind of like the Brady Bill, but where the bullet finishes off the brain damage.

Personally I hope he ducks when Talon News commando/prostitute Gannon pulls the trigger

That answers the second most pressing question of this decade. Why was Bill Clinton, the best Republican president in decades, impeached? Why did Kenneth Starr end his investigation not by proclaiming how well the system worked, but how so horrible it was Congress needed to eliminate his office to ensure the next president wouldn't face an independent prosecutor. Why so much money was invested in so little.

Bill Clinton wasn't hounded, he was used. He was a big fish chased after solely to let a lot of little fish get through.

The military fears cunning linguists?

(Sorry, I couldn't resist, either.)