Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:
Published Letters: 561
Editor's Choice: 69
First, what is missing is any description about how the husband and wife are getting along. Maybe their relationship is one foot in the grave and he is reaching out to anyone who might show him the affection she has long shut off. Then again, maybe is some self conceived Lothario who thinks all woman are like mountains to be climbed and she is just one more quest, or maybe the wife and him have had a long talk about the writer's apparant lack of any relationship which leads here to slum at married friends and maybe she just needs to be laid and he was picked to "save" her, thus the wife going to bed early "wink wink nod nod." Or maybe the wife and hubby think she is torn between being gay or hetero and want to get her into some threesome tryst but think it would be safe if he made the first move, then while she lay naked on the sofa but in the air with his tongue dancing excitedly between her legs, wife would walk in "to get a glass of milk mind you" shreik and demand she make amends by kissing her clit, then the threesome would begin full force with the digital cameral recording all for their website.
The point is, what is this woman doing wandering from house to house with no seeming attachment? What is this guy doing treating her like his "french maid" instead of an innocent house guest who deserves privacy and respect? What is the wife doing going to bed early and leaving them together? Have they had problems? Do they have children?
Before anyone assumes he's a leche or she is the spider woman I think the wife has to weigh in here.
If I were here I wouldn't say a word to the wife. If they are having marital problems or he is a womanizer she would already know and adding on won't change what she is doing or what he is doing. What I would do is quit sleeping from friends house to friends house and get a job, get a boyfriend or girlfriend, get your own place and when you travel get a room at the Marriot; and if that sounds too distant or expensive, then lady, when the wife announces she's going to bed and you are sitting on the sofa with a guy running his hand up your leg, well, that might be a good time to announce the night is late and its time for you to go to bed too.
Honestly, the answer to your situation was so bloody obvious I think your real query wasn't how to deal with being a "victim" and saving his "wife" but weather you should take advantage of the situation or tell his wife to stick it to him. In short, all you really wanted to know was whether to fuck him or screw him.
w
Do you imagine the French felt the same about putting all their eggs in Dien Bien Phu? Sure, what if it failed, they would just keep doing what they were doing and keep Indochina? Is that what anyone thinks will happen if we toss in our last reserves and break the military for one last "surge"?
This is going to be bad, very very bad.
Even the right agrees the chance of success is slim. What they won't accept is the risk of failure is so great it far outweighs the chance of success. Keep things the same and refuse to admit we are leaving and we have negotiating room, with the different insurgent groups, militias, Iraqi government and Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iran. However, declare we are going for "all in" one one last pitched battle in Baghdad then we'd better win. If not, the biggest fear of this administration "That the enemy will be empowered" will prove true in spades. The insurgents will believe they can defeat the Yankee devil and those sitting on the fence will join them, backing a seeming winner. Eight months and a thousand casualties from now the insurgency and sectarian violence will grow tenfold and no group will have any reason to join us or the government and no other country will bother to listen or fear us.
George Bush is effectively stating to the Middle East that this surge represents the best American can do militarily. If it fails, the US has failed. That is the worst that can happen.
Knowing no one with any understanding of what the hell is going on supports this one has to wonder if Bush is some alter Hitler a messianic psychotic who is so bent on God on his side that he might believe that our country has let him down and deserves to be destroyed for not realizing his vision ("Is New York burning?") or that whoever is pulling the strings has their own reasons for seeing this country brought down the same way the USSR was brought down in Afganistan. Either we are led by a megolmaniac out of control or a cabal of financial interests who see their money better spent without a strong America.
Either way this administration has to be removed and as quickly as possible. As bad as Nixon was, we had the benefit of people in higher places who knowing he'd gone too far put on the brakes. I fear we don't have those elder gentlemen this time around and it is up to us and our Congress. Let's hope it's not too late.