Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Alkaline

Published Letters: 1796
Editor's Choice: 44

Tuesday, October 7, 2008 10:47 AM

Toss that bum Reid

AFAICT, Reid done nothing but play doormat for Bush. If he stays, the Republicans will retain control of the senate even if they lose 10 seats.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 11:36 AM

Has anyone noticed ...

... how Repubicans go ballistic when they see situations where voter fraud might be a possibility, but completely ignore situations (such as electronic voting irregularities) where it is likely to have actually happened?

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 06:02 PM

If they want to catch really dangerous terrorists ....

... I think they would do well to concentrate their attention on Wall Street.

This is really stupid. Our government goes totally overboard watching regular people for the slightest sign of "terrorist" activity, but they completely miss the financial disaster of the century brewing right under their noses.

Friday, October 10, 2008 11:12 AM
Original article: Under the big top

What we need now ...

... is a scandal about Palin fooling around with Ayers.

Friday, October 10, 2008 11:27 AM
Original article: Under the big top

@EHJ

I've never lived through any presidential race as disgusting as this one. I thought the swiftboating episode in 2004 was obscene, but fomenting mob hatred at rallies? Nasty, nasty stuff.

What else can McCain do? There isn't a single Republican policy success he can cite to support his campaign. His own legislative agenda is nothing to be proud of, either.

Monday, October 13, 2008 05:37 PM

What has McCain been smoking?

McCain also expressed indignation over Barack Obama’s failure to repudiate Lewis’ words.

Since when is Obama responsible for repudiating remarks that others make without his approval?

And why would Obama issue such a repudiation? Is McCain expecting Obama to defend him from criticism of his campaign's sleazy methods? Would McCain then claim his sleazy methods were approved by Obama?

Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:45 PM

Dead issue

Economic turmoil has even gutted the potency of the one campaign issue with which the McCain campaign enjoyed real success: Offshore drilling.

I expect Republicans to shut up about this now that the ban has expired. They know it will take years to for drilling to even start, so talking about it now will just make them look stupid for pushing it as a quick fix.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 02:00 PM

@nancerich

Good Riddens

to this phony Democrat.

Yes, he was a phony. OTOH, Foley was obviously a genuine Republican.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 05:35 PM

@leftthecountry

I think I'll submit my petition on Nov 4th.

Thursday, October 16, 2008 08:18 AM

Translation

Wall Street has finally figured out that they are ALL devoted to screwing each other as hard as possible. No wonder they don't trust each other anymore. They never should have.

Monday, October 20, 2008 04:16 PM

@nancerich

... and a two week head start. ...

McCain got a heckuva lot more than that. Obama and Hillary were still battling for the Democratic nomination long after McCain became the mathematically-certain presumptive Republican nominee.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008 03:39 AM

@Mr E

If the Rev Wright was really smart, he'd give a fiery sermon about the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP).

That depends on whose side Rev Wright is really on. My guess is that he's on Rev Wright's side, and will do whatever he thinks is best for his own prestige and influence.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008 03:24 PM

According to the conservative definition of "Real Americans" ...

... the whole "war on terror" is a waste of time. None of the 9/11 attacks involved "Real American" targets, so nobody ever attacked "Real America". Maybe the "Real Americans" can crawl back under their rocks and leave the rest of us alone.

Friday, October 24, 2008 07:26 AM

@agore

The next few years would see us trying out every moonbat scheme that has been festering in these peoples' brains since 1968.

How would this be worse than the moonbat scheme (essentially no regulation) we just got done trying?

Friday, October 24, 2008 11:08 AM

@Devizier

Seriously. Who carves a B in their face?

Someone who would vote for McCain/Palin?

Friday, October 24, 2008 11:22 AM

@Chernobyl Kid

IMO, house prices will stop declining when they reach levels where people can afford them. Kinda sucks that lots of decent-paying jobs have been exported in the last decade, so we might have a ways to go yet on those prices.

WRT your question, I think the pundits are only saying the economy might stop getting worse if and when house prices bottom out, perhaps because that would end the massive writedowns in the finance industry. If prices stabilize, all those bad securities could be valued and might become marketable again, if only at a fraction of their original prices.

Friday, October 24, 2008 11:36 AM

I have a question...

I've been reading that the securitization of mortgages makes loan renegotiation difficult or impossible because there isn't any one creditor who can speak for all of the securities holders who have an interest in a particular loan.

If this is so, how can foreclosures be processed? It is pretty much a given that foreclosing in this economy results in a loss to the lender, so who can approve that loss on behalf of all of the securities holders?

Friday, October 24, 2008 11:53 AM

@Kingbreaker

Maybe she should have used McCain's staff make-up artist to make the whole thing more realistic.

I don't think that would have worked. She just wanted to look like she'd been beaten, not like she was dead.

Friday, October 24, 2008 12:26 PM

Just what we need...

... another president who won't accept the consequences of his own decisions.

Friday, October 24, 2008 01:22 PM

This isn't a complete surprise.

It is pretty obvious that the highest-paid campaign staffer isn't her speech writer.

Friday, October 24, 2008 03:50 PM

Palin has no policy positions...

... except possibly to use government as a tool for the advancement of her religious beliefs. Just about everything she says is whatever sounds good at the moment. Practically none if it reflects how she might actually act if she became president.

Monday, October 27, 2008 10:10 AM

@tedol

Who can say this in the pages of the Wall Street Journal--supposedly a publication devoted to economic thought--and not get laughed out of the field?

That raises a question: Is the Wall Street Journal really dedicated to economic thought, or is it more a vehicle for economic propaganda?

Monday, October 27, 2008 11:41 AM

@Verses

In reality, government central planning caused the problem in the first place.

I'd like to hear your explanation of how government planning was involved in the securitization of mortgage debt.

Most Active Letters Threads

694

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
325

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon