Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

Treeple

Published Letters: 491
Editor's Choice: 16

Wednesday, July 30, 2008 02:30 PM
Original article: Chewing the fat

I agree with others here

Either you accept that women want to lose weight or you pretend that "fat women" are happy with their bodies, but the success of the diet industry suggests otherwise.

Either studies should include and/or focus on women, or they shouldn't. Research is not designed to coddle or flatter. If women are included in research, and it's a weight loss study, they will sometimes be called "fat" or "obese," which are at bottom value-neutral terms.

Exercise is perhaps THE healthiest, most reliable, most consistent, etc. weight loss strategy out there. Yet people seem to think in terms of diet alone. If this study highlights the role of exercise, good for it.

Friday, August 1, 2008 02:04 PM

Version of self-injury that's trying to break into the mainstream

Guess what? Breaking skin does release endorphins and adrenaline. Not surprised people who do it once want to do it again!

Friday, August 1, 2008 02:16 PM

Try again

Don't go to grad school, like someone suggested upthread. Grad school is an abusive spouse.

I also wouldn't worry about the people who chide you for not being "specific" enough. Sometimes folks want to protect their identity a little, people! It's not all just about entertainment.

Anyway, I am puzzled about this "therapy leading to life destruction" thing. Is it possible that the process, which often sucks to work, had a negative effect on your functioning, which in the best of worlds, is temporary and tolerable? (In your case not, which is unfortunate.) Or perhaps you had just a total idiot. Try, try again.

Try again with everything. Except expecting your family to start treating you right when they never have before.

Good luck.

Monday, August 18, 2008 02:48 PM

Stick with the criticism of the exploitative essays

Because this criticism is b.s.:

"...they also tell children there's something wrong with them and imply that they don't deserve to have the kind of fun summers their peers are enjoying."

There is something wrong with them--with their weight, anyway. If kids are "desperate" to go to fat camp, they're more than just chubby. And there's no reason to think that "fat camp" can't be fun. It's camp!

Which peers are you talking about, anyway? The minority of kids whose parents can afford to send them to regular sleepaway camp, or the ones who are bored shitless trying to find something to do all summer?

Tuesday, August 19, 2008 04:41 AM

So is this why she's been mostly missing from the Atlantic?

Because I always check for her name first. I was wondering where she's been, but I guess writing a book-length version of the article on learning to love the public schools is a pretty good trade.

Friday, August 22, 2008 02:02 PM

But she still comes up with things like "I ovulate sand"

Come on, that's genius.

Okay, so her specials have gotten progressively less funny since Notorious C.H.O. She bought into her own awesomeness maybe too much. But as long as the first couple of performances are out there, I'll give her all the rope she needs.

Friday, August 22, 2008 02:05 PM
Original article: Sassy in pink

Hm

Some kids deal with the horrible trauma of losing a parent with drugs, stealing, or bullying other children. But obviously, changing one's hair color is much worse.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008 02:48 PM

Something must be wrong with me, because I think the term PUMA is cute and I'm glad they're out there being all loyal and shit

Once again, people, it's not Salon's job to put Obama in the White House. Its writers are allowed to (and should!) raise questions and consider the nuances of the primary campaign and beyond.

I listened on and off to NPR's convention coverage all last night, and there is no way that anyone is stealing this from Obama. In between the slavering excitement of the PUMAs...or should I say, Chris Matthews, and the less measured voices I read here who persist in seeing the enemy in all the wrong places...in between those extremes is the army of former Hillary supporters who are ready and willing to get behind Obama. And there's a lot more of them in the middle.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 06:54 PM

Meanwhile, go Kerry!

Zing!

Friday, August 29, 2008 02:20 PM

So unimpressed

God, McCain is trolling hard for former Clinton supporters. Well, this is one who isn't falling for it. Female does not equal feminist, okay? The next president will shape the supreme court. I don't have to love Obama--no way, no how, no McCain!

Friday, August 29, 2008 02:46 PM
Original article: What Sarah Palin means

Desperate

It's desperate, desperate, desperate. Perhaps McCain thinks it will nail in those angry Clinton supporters. I hope it backfires. Women are not fucking interchangeable, even though the anti-choice right may see us as a series of interchangeable parts.

I have too many years of non-procreational sex ahead of me to stop caring about access to birth control, let alone abortion. And I've seen too many people who should not be parents under any circumstances be parents under the worst of circumstances. There needs to be a cultural shift BACK toward preventative birth control, and it's not going to come from people who think that birth control is a variant of abortion.

No way, no how, no McCain!

Friday, August 29, 2008 02:50 PM
Original article: What Sarah Palin means

Lay off the beauty queen remarks, though

I don't need to know anything about Palin other than "anti-choice," so I don't know why or for how long she did the pageant circuit. But a lot of women do it for scholarship money for higher education. There are a lot of real things to criticize her for, okay? Let's not criticize her for that.

Saturday, August 30, 2008 09:56 AM

Yes, exactly

And I wish Clinton and Obama had said as much. Clinton wasn't groundbreaking because she wanted to be president, she was groundbreaking because she fucking campaigned for it. God, I hope this backfires for former Clinton supporters, I really hope it does.

Saturday, August 30, 2008 10:16 AM
Original article: Quote of the day

"Democratic women are falling over themselves to urge people to vote against her"

Folger, did you mean "women who are democrats" or "women who believe in concept of democracy"? I think you meant the former, in which case, we are urging people to vote against her because Palin is not FOR us. She was chosen as the running mate on the REPUBLICAN ticket, and as such, would be one half of a team that is for pretty much everything I'm against, and vice versa.

But you're probably right. "Democratic" women aren't supporting Palin because we're all backstabbing bitches.

It's the battle of the stereotypes! Which will emerge victorious: the irrational Hillary-supporting menopausal women who are captivated by the drums of sisterhood, or the women who are against Palin because we never support our own?

Tune in later...

Most Active Letters Threads

726

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
272

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
185

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon