Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

NewYorkNY

Published Letters: 171
Editor's Choice: 1

Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:50 PM

No values Dems

Joe Lieberman needs to go. He blocked investigations into the failures of the government's response to Katrina, he blocked investigations into illegals behavior by the Bush administration, he blocked investigations into no bid contracts to Halliburton and Blackwater. Why does he deserve to keep his chairmanship? He has sucked at this job.

Obama and some senators have said that they want to look into abuses by the Bush administration before and during the occupation of Iraq. Lieberman could use his chairmanship to block those investigations, as he has in the past when it came to looking into any of Bush's misdeeds. Lieberman will run interference for the Republicans because he has been bitter about the Dems supporting the Democratic nominee for the Senate in Connecticut. Obama can rest assured that his attempts to govern will be obstructed by Lieberman. Now, if the Senate Dems want to strip Lieberman of his chairmanship when he does prevent the investigation, they will face charges of partisanship. I can see Lieberman now, standing before the microphone with his Republican buddies standing behind him saying "I am losing my role on the committee because I had the courage to stand up in the face of partisan bickering and vindictiveness." Then, the Democrats will back down and nothing will happen.

Some people are hailing this as a defeat for the "left win blogosphere" or the "crazy left-wing of the party." Guess what? People who vote for Democrats are left of center. The Republicans vote the way their base wants them to vote because their base sent them to Washington to represent them and their beliefs and vote accordingly. Democrats treat their base as if we are their dirty little secret.

Republicans are laughing at us while they say that it is nice of the Democrats for being "classy" and "magnanimous." They would never take this from one of their caucus members. Obama and Reid will see how dumb this move is when they need every vote from the party to pass a bill. Reid and Obama have shown they do not have the spine to impose party discipline, and that will come back to bite them time after time until 2012.

Should we be surprised, though? In 2006, Democratic activists and the left wing blogosphere, who are derided by the party and the media, worked their asses off to raise money, knock on doors, make phone calls, send e-mails, and stuff envelopes to move Republican seats into the Democratic column. We did this because they said they wanted to end the illegal occupation of Iraq , protect our civil liberties, and make sure things like Katrina would be investigated and never happen again. Not only did they fail to keep these promises, they did the exact opposite. Obama and the Democrats voted to keep funding the occupation of Iraq, rather than using the power of the purse to end it. They voted in overwhelming numbers to pass FISA. And we still haven't heard anything about Katrina.

I am keeping my money and time. Screw the Democrats.

Most Active Letters Threads

337

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
139

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon