Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following Salon Premium Member:

walter_map

Published Letters: 1444     Editor's Choice: 20

  • GG

    [Read the article: The bipartisan consensus on U.S. military spending]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The U.S. spends more on "defense" than the rest of the world combined. All leading presidential candidates want that to continue.

    And as you properly noted, nobody wants to be accused of being 'weak on defense'.

    So you have to come up with an effective counter to the accusation. That will be easier as the economy goes into decline and people wonder where all the money is going.

    In the meantime, you could rightly point out that all of our Glorious Military was useless in preventing the 9/11 attacks. And that Clinton was able to successfully prevent at least eight similar attacks using conventional police work, didn't torture anybody, and didn't trash the Constitution in the process.

    Clinton vs. Terror, Republicans vs. Clinton

    President Clinton led the fight against terrorism over strong opposition from Republicans in Congress and the pro-Republican Media. Here's a partial - yet incredibly long - list of accomplishments against terrorism for which the Clinton Administration gets almost no credit or even recognition. President Clinton:

    -- sent legislation to Congress to TIGHTEN AIRPORT SECURITY. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.

    -- sent legislation to Congress to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF TERRORIST FUNDING. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.

    -- sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF EXPLOSIVES USED BY TERRORISTS. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA.

    When Republicans couldn't prevent executive action, President Clinton:

    -- Developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.

    --Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Boston airport.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.

    -- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.

    -- Tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).

    -- Brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.

    -- Did not blame Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after they had left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively -- and successfully -- to stop future terrorist attacks.

    -- Named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.

    -- Tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.

    -- Detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries

    -- Created a national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.

    -- Robert Oakley, Reagan Counterterrorism Czar says of Clinton's efforts "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama"

    -- Paul Bremer, Bush's Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley saying he believed the Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden. "

    -- Barton Gellman of the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort."

    Here, in stark contrast, is part of the Bush-Cheney anti-terrorism record before September 11, 2001:

    -- Backed off Clinton administration's anti-terrorism efforts.

    -- Shelved the Hart-Rudman report.

    -- Appointed new anti-terrorism task force under Dick Cheney. Group did not even meet before 9/11.

    -- Called for cuts in anti-terrorism efforts by the Department of Defense.

    -- Gave no priority to anti-terrorism efforts by Justice Department.

    -- Ignored warnings from Sandy Berger, Louis Freeh, George Tennant, Paul Bremer, and Richard Clarke about the urgency of terrorist threats.

    -- Halted Predator drone tracking of Osama bin Laden.

    -- Did nothing in wake of August 6 C.I.A. report to president saying Al Qaeda attack by hijack of an airliner almost certain.

    -- Bush - knowing about the terrorists' plans to attack in America, warned that terrorists were in flight schools in the US - took a four week vacation.

    -- By failing to order any coordination of intelligence data, missed opportunity to stop the 9/11 plot as Clinton-Gore had stopped the millennium plots.

    -- Blamed President Clinton for 9/11.

    http://www.mikehersh.com/printer_Clinton_vs_Terror_Republicans_vs_Clinton.shtml

  • Sgt Rock

    [Read the article: The bipartisan consensus on U.S. military spending]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    The US has 730 Military Installations & Bases in Over 50 Country

    Can't they defend themselves?

    The military-industrial complex needs the money. Lots is good, more is better, and all is best.

    Which isn't nearly enough. Next, hock your house to pay for 'weapons systems' that aren't needed and don't work. Sell your kids and send the proceeds to Raytheon. They'll condemn you for being so cheap. What are you, some kind of commie?

    Nearly 20% of US GNP goes to the military. This is why the roads and the schools are falling apart.

    How much is enough? Don't be silly. It's never enough.

  • And what does the military do with all that money?

    [Read the article: The bipartisan consensus on U.S. military spending]
    [Read more letters about this article: Here]

    Who knows?

    More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends.

    "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.

    $2.3 trillion - that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.

    "We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml